Essays and Musings on Animals and Society

Thursday, June 30, 2005

"Rags" (The Face of Animal Experimentation) 

We called him "Rags." He was just a cur,
But twice on the Western Line,
That little old bunch of faithful fur
Had offered his life for mine.

And all that he got was bones and bread,
Or the leavings of soldier grub,
But he'd give his heart for a pat on the head,
Or a friendly tickle and rub.

And Rags got home with the regiment,
And then, in the breaking away—
Well, whether they stole him, or whether he went,
I am not prepared to say.

But we mustered out, some to beer and gruel,
And some to sherry and shad,
And I went back to the Sawbones School,
Where I was still an undergrad.

One day they took us budding M.D.s
To one of those Institutes
Where they demonstrate every new disease
By means of bisected brutes.

They had one animal tacked and tied
And slit like a full-dressed fish,
With his vitals pumping away inside
As pleasant as one might wish.

I stopped to look like the rest, of course,
And the beast's eyes levelled mine;
His short tail thumped with a feeble force,
And he uttered a tender whine.

It was Rags, yes, Rags, who was martyred there,
Who was quartered and crucified,
And he whined that whine which is doggish prayer,
And he licked my hand—and died.

And I was no better in part nor whole
Than the gang I was found among,
And his innocent blood was on the soul
Which he blessed with his dying tongue.

Well, I've seen men go to courageous death
In the air, on sea, on land!
But only a dog would spend his breath
In a kiss for his murderer's hand.

—Edmund Vance Cooke

I had to read this twice to get the full impact.

Through Their Eyes 

Horses can be ridden, they are harnessed, raced and driven
And dogs are our friends, or so we say.
But gentle cows and sheep are only good for meat
And chickens kept alive for eggs they lay.

Cats in our collection give solace and affection,
Their social graces mystify and charm.
On the farm you will find creatures of a different kind,
Their living deaths endured in darkened barn.

If piglets had their druthers they would not leave their mothers,
Nor goats forsake their kids and walk away.
Ostriches and emus would rather not be on the menu
And buffalo would roam the plains today.

It is rather a conundrum why these facts are seen as humdrum While
animals are raised in pain and fear.
They're not recognized as pets so we'll have no regrets
As they forfeit precious lives that none revere.

Cows may be labeled cattle as though they're goods and chattel And
hogs are really piggies in disguise.
Change their names, forget their faces, wipe away the traces But
remember the betrayal in their eyes.

Ann Wilson

Ann Wilson is a member of Activists Against Factory Farming

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

With Belief Comes Responsibility 

Rather than use God as the ultimate permission-giver for all sorts of selfishness and cruelty, believers need to see God as the ultimate conscience, imploring us to live a life of mercy and humility. People of faith must channel God's love through themselves and extend God's merciful dominion through charity, compassion, and self-sacrifice. Faith in an all-loving Creator entails an enormous obligation to show love to that which He created.

Tuesday, June 28, 2005

Veganism is Absolutely Not Dogmatic 

From time to time I hear the complaint that veganism is dogmatic. It's not. The "dogmas" upon which veganism is based are the Golden Rule and the principle of least harm. Both of these guidelines give the follower wide latitude in interpretation.

Every vegan knows that every other vegan can never be a perfect vegan, and that it would be an exercise in futility to strive for that impossible ideal. Every time we walk outside, we're liable to step on insects. We live in a society in which the use of products with animal-derived ingredients is rampant and unavoidable.

Veganism is more a frame of mind; an honest effort to avoid harming other living beings. Generally speaking, we have the highest obligation as ethical vegans to refrain from causing suffering that is obvious or extensive, and easily preventable.

Veganism is a derived, not root principle. It is outgrowth of compassion, of a connection to the world, of a sympathetic desire to help not hurt other creatures.

The Official Vegan Handbook (which doesn't exist — further proof of non-dogma) does not specify precise rules by which one must abide. It does not say you must drive under the posted speed limit on your way to work each morning, to be more ready to swerve if a squirrel runs across the road. It does not spell out what to do if there is a wasp in your child's room. But if you have sympathy and respect for all living creatures and a genuine desire to be a friend and protector, your conscience will guide you toward peaceful, mindful resolutions. You'll be vegan by default.

Basically, veganism says that in terms of minimizing harm and maximizing charity toward all creatures, "do the best you can."

We all know that there are a number of things we can do instantly, at no cost, with little effort, to reduce unimaginably hard suffering of animals. They suffer because of our habits — selfish habits — that we can break in a heartbeat. No dogma is required to adjust our life so that it spares thousands of animals from horrid lifelong misery in factory farms.



Related Resource:

Vegan FAQ, by Vegan Outreach. This essay provides thoughtful, non-boastful answers (including "I don't know") about many aspects of veganism. The authors specifically warn against activists becoming dogmatic, which I think is sound advice. This next thing I'm going to say may be stupid and ill-advised, and please don't get the wrong impression because I have a great deal of respect for PETA... If you consider yourself a non-vegan, and are not categorically opposed to the idea of veganism, and would like to know more, but cannot stand PETA or are turned off by them, then Vegan Outreach is the site to which I want to send you. There are no nude models in cages or billboards with arguably offensive messages. Just honest information about the billions of animals that suffer in factory farms and how you can help them. Thoughtful, considerate, and humble, yet powerful.

Rules of Thumb 

If you wouldn't do it to your dog or cat, don't do it (or pay someone else to do it) to cows, pigs, and sheep. The cows, pigs. and sheep suffer just like your dog or cat.

If you wouldn't do it to your bird, don't do it to chickens and turkeys. The chickens and turkeys suffer just like your bird.

If you wouldn't do it to your fish, don't do it to other fish. Fish impaled on hooks or caught in nets suffer just like your fish.

Monday, June 27, 2005

The Center for Consumer Fraud 

The www.ParentalFreedom.com web site is from www.vegsource.com, so take it with a grain of salt, as I do, if you want. But even if you take it with a whole shaker of salt (not recommended), I think you'll agree it exposes some of the corruption and underhanded tactics of the pro-meat and dairy, anti-animal rights lobby. In particular, the site is a parody of the frighteningly immoral (and grossly misnamed) Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF). Browse through the various articles, especially Response of VegSource to [CCF President] Rick Berman's letter, Are Today's Teens More Toxic?, and Junk Pushers Use Junk Science.


CCF represents the interests of companies like Tyson and Pilgrim's Pride, which make a living from killing animals and denying them comforts. Lately, the group has been spending a disproportionate amount of resources attacking People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). Why? They are afraid of PETA, because PETA can show, through videos, first-hand encounters, expert testimony, and even industry publications, that the animals forced to exist in CCF's clients' operations suffer horribly their whole lives. When consumers learn about the living conditions, genetically-altered bodies, lack of care, and deliberately tortuous slaughter of animals at these places, they tend to react with pity and disgust, and often change their behavior as a result. Which cuts into the profits of CCF's major clients. If PETA's depictions of factory farms were inaccurate or deceptive, CCF (and Tyson and Pilgrim's Pride) would have sued and won years ago. But they can't do that. They know that every scene in every video, every account of violent abuse and utter meanness that goes on in their clients' businesses and that is exposed by PETA and a hundred other animal rights groups, is true. So they're reduced to making ad hominum attacks on PETA's credibility, and distorting their record.

(It's the same technique CCF uses against any group perceived to be a threat. Currently CCF director Rick Berman is about the only person in America claiming that obesity is not a major health problem. Good God, just look around you. Then look at the ads on TV. His clients don't want us to think too much about our weight when buying their products. The bigger our bottoms, the bigger their bottom lines. Just this week a study came out showing that spending on obesity-related illness shot up a thousand percent from 1987, and that's after adjusting for inflation. In 1987, 2 percent of health care costs were for obesity; in 2002, the latest year for which data are available, the figure is 11 percent. How can anyone willingly push poor health, which can lead to financial ruin, on their fellow citizens? One possible answer appears at the end of this post.)

Although it's made me sick to my stomach, I've managed to read just about every CCF article on their website. Here's my critique: they're clever, and without an ounce of integrity. They'll use every nasty trick in the book. Two of their favorites — which are really quite telling when you think about it: attribute the sins of their clients to their enemies, and pretend to have the virtues of the whistleblowers. So, for example, PETA invests hundreds of thousands of dollars and 25 years helping companion animals by distributing doghouses, subsidizing shelter construction and veterinary training, promoting adoption, educating the public about puppy mill and pet store horrors, applying pressure to replace ghastly incinerators with humane injection, and personally rescuing every species imaginable from the most horrid and deadly environments. But CCF, with a one-time contribution to a shelter that PETA exposed for its extreme cruelty, touts itself as the real animal lover. Conversely — and ironically — the harshest criticism CCF can level at PETA is that they kill animals. Never mind that, like animal shelters across the country, under duress, PETA puts some of the several million companion animals that have no homes to sleep, using humane euthanasia. Never mind that PETA has spared untold numbers of animals from suffering and early death through their sterilization clinics. Never mind that CCF's clients kill thousands of animals every hour, after giving them a lifetime of misery and confinement. Never mind that unlike PETA staffers, who weep openly and hug the animals as they give them a painless death, CCF's clients kill animals with an efficient ruthlessness, and often with over-the-top brutality, and for profit.

My goal is not to uphold PETA as a perfect organization or the paragon of righteousness. They've made their share of mistakes and errors in judgment. In a room of several hundred people, I've criticized some of PETA's tactics — and my remarks were made directly to PETA's president, who was also in the room. But you better believe I will defend them from blatantly unfair charges, or ones that make them out to be something they're not, or that mischaracterize the motives of the group. These folks dedicate their lives to making a better world for animals. I don't have to love PETA to hate slander and duplicitousness directed at them, especially when done with the intent of perpetuating cruelty to animals.



Related posts:

Where's Your Apology, Center for Consumer Freedom?

Myopic Thought of the Day

Big Fat Lies

Related Resource:

Here is a glimpse of Rick Berman's clients at work. Keep in mind as you watch this senseless brutality that the victims are live birds, at the end of a hideous and short life, scared witless, and suffering every second of the film. There is no reason for this — and you can stop it. Pilgrim's Pride denies that anything in the video is worth getting upset about. Please, I don't care if you hate PETA's guts, do not support this type of violence. Please look into tasty, healthful vegetarian alternatives to chicken. It's as easy as going to your local grocery store. And please do not eat one more meal at KFC.

"For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows" (Timothy 6:10)

Sunday, June 26, 2005

Protest Petland 

Northern Virginia and DC Metro residents: Help us protest Petland, which buys their animals from puppy mills.

Almost every weekend, people who love animals and hate the way they're treated in the cruel puppy mill system gather outside the Petland store on Little River Turnpike in Fairfax, Virginia (directions below), to alert shoppers and passers-by about the suffering of mass-produced "pets" and how pet stores cause shelter animals to be killed.

If you've never protested, or never even thought about protesting, this might be a perfect opportunity. The demonstrations outside Petland are entirely peaceful and lawful. They have been going on for quite some time, and the police probably know some of the regulars by name now. There have been no incidents and the officers come by as part of regular patrol duty. The core group of demonstrators has plenty of signs and handouts and knows all the tips for effectively conveying your message.

You may not be vegetarian, you may even be a hunter. But these are dogs and cats we're talking about. Rabbits and ferrets and birds and fish. Our friends. How many times have our lives been enriched beyond words by our furred, feathered, and finned animal companions? More than we can count, I know. And how do we treat them in return? Well, I know that you personally give them lots of love. You play with them, feed them good food, and keep them healthy. But in puppy mills (and kitty mills, rabbit mills, etc.) the animals are ignored and treated like so much product. They're confined to small cages, and they get virtually no exercise, companionship, or stimulation. Even their food is a monotonous grub. They're trucked across the country and placed in pet store windows, where people buy them out of ignorance, pity, or impulse.

The puppy mill—pet store industry cares about profit, not about the welfare or happiness of the animals. In most pet stores, the animals are kept in substandard conditions and sold to people who may not have the slightest idea how to take care of them, and who may tire of the idea in a few months. This happens all the time, it is not theory.

There is a mountain of evidence that unsold animals get killed, and that animals routinely die from poor care while held hostage in the system.

The laws that protect the animals are woefully inadequate and weakly enforced. Anything tragic or disturbing or disgusting that you can think of — it happens on a regular and recurring basis. But as important as it is to strengthen animal welfare regulations and enforcement, the most effective way — at this time — to help the animals is through educating the public about the horrors of puppy mills and advocating adoption over buying. That's where you come in. By holding up a sign or handing out brochures, you inform people that Petland animals are inhumanely treated and that the problem of pet overpopulation — which is deadly to shelter animals — is exacerbated by pet stores, especially national chains like Petland.

I've met some of the Petland protestors. They're very friendly and supportive. You get a great feeling knowing that you are helping loving and innocent creatures that are badly abused, and to whom we owe so much. Even if you're standing in the hot sun or the freezing cold, you know that you are doing the right thing and you can feel the support of all your fellow protestors. Yes, you will get a nasty comment here and there. People do not like to be told what to do, even if all you are doing is holding a picture of a caged dog, as a reminder of the source of Petland's puppies. But I can tell you from experience, you will get many more thumbs up, "right on's," and nods of appreciation. That is an encouraging pick-me-up and a nice reminder that you are really doing something helpful and compassionate.

I can't say enough about the Petland protestors, their organizers, and the positive impact they've had. (I'll show up for more protests, I promise!!) But their work is far from done. It really won't be over until there are no more "mills" pumping out animals as though they were things on a shelf, instead of complex, intelligent, and social animals with profound needs.

Please visit their web site, PetStoreCruelty.org, and give them a hand. This is grassroots activism at it best. It is not associated with any formal organization, It is just caring, concerned people. Please consider coming down some weekend for an hour or 90 minutes to add your presence. It's a very easy requirement for a great cause. Please tell me your experiences — or I might just see you there.

Thank you, but even more, thank you on behalf of the animals.



To give you an idea of the everyday issues with pet stores and puppy mills, here are excerpts from a recent mailing from the group:

Come to the Petland protest this Saturday, June 18, 1:00—2:30 PM!

Recently, the Petland manager was happily telling customers that he expected 45 new puppies just for that ONE WEEK. Those of you involved in rescue know how difficult it is to find good, permanent homes for 45 animals. If you can spare an hour, please join us. Newcomers are always welcome! Our focus this week is adoption from shelters and rescue groups. Bring info about your favorite rescue group, and we will be happy to pass it along to prospective adopters.

FOX MILL PETS on Elden Street, Herndon, VA, has a freezer just behind the fish aquariums at the back of the store. Recently an alert activist caught a glimpse inside, hoping it would just be people's frozen lunches. The entire freezer was FULL OF DEAD ANIMALS. They were in plastic bags, and there were smudges of what appeared to be blood around the freezer door.

Fox Mill obtains its puppies from the Hunte Corp., just as Petland does, and that means puppy mills. The puppies in Fox Mill have more room and seem better cared for than those at Petland, and there are far fewer of them. But as this incident reveals, appearances can be deceptive. A former employee told us that Petland's freezer also contains dead animals. Dead puppies were found in the freezer of the Boston branch of Woof & Co., another Hunte-supplied store which recently closed down because of complaints about sick puppies. Causes of death for all these animals: stress, injury during shipping and handling, overcrowding, disease, overcrowding, inadequate care and most of all, human greed.

Directions: From the Beltway, get off at Exit 52, Route 236 in Annandale, going WEST toward Fairfax. Go several miles. The first mall on the right (near sign for Einstein Bagels) is Pickett Shopping Center. Turn right at the traffic light onto Pickett Road. We'll be on the public sidewalk at the next traffic light, right side of the road, but to prevent Petland from calling the police about trespassers, please pass us and park at the next mall over, on the left side of Pickett Road, near McDonald's. The street address of Petland is 9404 Main Street, Fairfax, VA 22031.

Thanks!

www.petstorecruelty.org

Saturday, June 25, 2005

Cruelty and Dishonesty are a Preference, Not an Orientation 

The Loudoun County, Virginia Board of Supervisors voted to cancel an anti-bullying program in schools because they felt it was "pro-gay."

I'll let that one sink in for a moment.

I haven't seen the curricula, but just for argument's sake let's say it focused 100 percent on not picking on gays or the children of gay parents. That still wouldn't be pro-gay. It would, however, be pro-nice and pro-civil.

It's a shame that so many gays, especially during the difficult period of adolescence, are forced to suffer in silence because they have to bottle up their expressions of love, because they're treated as outcasts, abnormal, deviants, and threats. Anti-gay groups often point to increased rates of emotional problems in gays as proof that homosexuality is a dangerous "lifestyle." But they fail to realize that they cause those emotional problems through their meanness and ostracizing.

Most likely the anti-bullying program teaches students that it's not nice to gang up on anyone, especially those who are weaker or don't fit in. Victims of bullying may be deeply hurt by the experience and carry emotional scars for years. A substantial portion of their childhood may be ruined. If, at an early age, we can learn to respect others, control our anger, and be helpful rather than hurtful, we will have a more peaceful world. Animals will benefit, too. Bullies always pick weaker victims, and animals are, in almost every case, the weakest and most vulnerable among us.

A reasonable initiative to promote friendship and respect, which has had proven results in other jurisdictions, was canceled by homophobia.

How Cruel Can We Be? 

Gloria and Hal are two beautiful chestnut-brown mules who used to live on a farm where the farmer would "punish" them by tying their heads to their hooves.

And for what terrible crime were they being punished? They wanted to eat. They were underfed and tried to break out of their small pen that didn't have suffient foraging.

Gloria and Hal now live at Poplar Spring Animal Sanctuary, where they graze in spacious pastures and enjoy each other's company. They're both friendly but a little shy. Give either of them a carrot and you've got a new buddy.

Friday, June 24, 2005

Karl Rove: Apologize 

At a speech in New York City, GOP campaign strategist Karl Rove claimed that after the September 11th attacks, conservatives planned for war while liberals planned for therapy for the terrorists. What a mean-spirited lie. In the wake of September 11th, liberals, conservatives, and everyone in between were in shock and came together as Americans. The liberals I know were beside themselves with anger and grief.

As sports show host and Washington Post columnist Tony Kornheiser reminded us, the September 11th pain "was shared by everybody." My mom's oldest childhood friend was on the first plane that crashed into the World Trade Center.

Shame on Mr. Rove for turning a tragedy into cheap political opportunism and a forum to besmirch millions of Americans.

I know a lot of liberals and none expressed an interest in offering therapy for the terrorists. But I do recall people inquiring as to the root causes of terrorism, and that is something we need to know the truth on if we're ever going to stop it. And no, it's not enough just to say that terrorists, or Al Queda, or Muslims are evil, as good as that may feel superficially. There were also many liberals, and more than a few conservatives, who remember the Bush administration's cuts in anti-terrorism funding prior to September 11th and called him to the carpet on that. Likewise, about half of America, not just liberals, became sick and tired of being lied to about the war in Iraq, even as they recognized the tyranny of Saddam Hussein and acknowledged, if not agreed with, the arguments for toppling him. So maybe the liberals' anti-terrorism stance was more nuanced, and was mixed with criticism of Bush's policies, but to characterize it as coddling is slanderous and insulting.

Mr. Rove, under pressure, later said that he didn't mean all liberals, just a few. Well, he never made that qualification in his speech. "I didn't mean all [fill in the blank]..." is the classic, lame, backpeddling way to squirm your way out of trashing a huge constituency. In his non-apology, Mr, Rove said he was talking about people like Michael Moore. Well, I saw Fahrenheit 911, and there was nothing in there that remotely showed sympathy for the terrorists.

Mr. Rove should show some character and respect, and apologize to decent people like my parents — liberals and patriots.

Thursday, June 23, 2005

My Cow or Your Scenario 

I have a feeling most readers will like some parts of the linked article and not others. I could be wrong. It's yet another version of "Your Child or Your Dog," by animal rights activist and author Steven Best. A little long-winded and erudite in parts, but I think he makes some worthwhile and thought-provoking points. He also does a credible job, in my opinion, of showing the limitations of using this scenario as the basis for any real-world policy.

Here's the article: My Dog or Your Child? Ethical Dilemmas and the Hierarchy of Moral Value.

I've explored the "child or dog" dilemma in a few previous blog posts (which you can find by entering "child or the dog" in quotes in the blog's search box), but wanted to add a few comments that came to mind as I read Mr. Best's dissertation...

Thought for the Day 

"How smart does a chimpanzee have to be before killing him constitutes murder?"
Carl Sagan

PCRM Shows How "Necessary" Animal Tests Can Be Replaced 

Until now, blood tests for diabetes patients have relied on antibodies that are induced in animals and cause them considerable suffering in the process. In this conventional method, cells are injected into the abdomens of live mice, who consequently become painfully swollen with antibody-filled fluid. Technicians extract the fluid with a needle.

The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) has changed all that. They've advanced the state of the art by developing a cruelty-free method of producing antibodies. Working with two private laboratories, a team of researchers under the direction of PCRM president Neal Barnard M.D. was able not only to successfully grow antibody-producing cells in a test tube, but to do it without the aid of calf serum, which is typically used as a cell growth promoter. In addition to its being a gruesome byproduct of the slaughterhouse industry, calf serum may be contaminated with prions or other disease agents.

The final product from the PCRM effort is a kit to determine insulin levels. Lab results so far show that the PCRM-developed test is as accurate or more accurate than the old way. PCRM is working on two scientific papers that describe the project.

Had PCRM not taken action to replace this cruel scientific process, who knows how long it would have persisted? Often, defenders of animal tests claim that there are no alternatives. But that becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy if no one has the desire or initiative to develop alternatives. Where there is a will, there is a way, but in most of the biomedical establishment there is no will to do away with using animals. It took PCRM less than a year to go from concept to finished product. How many other processes that cause pain and suffering in animals could be eliminated if some effort was put into replacing them? We would almost certainly have more reliable science, increased safety, and improved human health as byproducts if that were done.

Note that animal tests currently in use are not the result of rigorous, "best practice" competition. They are the result of convention and in many cases chance. They have never been validated like their replacements.



Related resources:

Humane Charity Seal of Approval lists health charities that do not conduct or fund animal experiments or animal tests.

The Doris Day Animal League lobbies for increased funding for non-animal alternatives and for replacing animal tests with currently available non-animal alternatives.

Note: in future posts, I'll write about existing non-animal methodologies that are superior to the animal tests they replace but — for reasons of inertia, not science — are not being used in the U.S.

Wednesday, June 22, 2005

Victims Helping Victims: Lions Protect Girl From Abductors 

The lions come out looking far better than the humans in this story, about a group of lions that protected a girl who was kidnapped and beaten by members of her own species.

How do we thank these mighty and lion-hearted beasts? Here are some of the ways:

Silent Connection 

Our "All About Rabbits" presentation at the public library had gone well. We brought two rabbits, Fiona and Cuddles. Fiona because she was my rabbit, and Cuddles because he liked being petted more than any other rabbit in the rescue league. We did our best to make sure that both rabbits would be relaxed. We brought their regular litter boxes, hay, and toys. Each had a willow tepee for hiding.

We had a larger-than-expected turnout, probably because of the big promotion the library had done. Twenty-five kids and almost that many parents. We learned about what rabbits eat, and what colors they are, and that no one is really sure why they're called bunnies, and that none live on Pluto, although we're not certain. We learned how to flop like a rabbit and hop like a rabbit.

Then it was time to let the children feed the rabbits and pet the rabbits. (We brought the rabbits' favorite foods to make this part go more smoothly.) We had to very diligently make sure that the rabbits did not get overstressed, and that every child got a turn. Everything went fine, although the rabbits were getting a little wiggly toward the end and seemed glad when it was over; they each hung out in their tepees for a while.

We answered questions from kids and parents, and then we cleaned up. we were very careful to pick up every last piece of hay and hair (that's hair, not hare), so that the room would be spotless when we left. After all, we wanted to be invited back.

As I was getting ready to take down Fiona's pen and put her in her carrier, a volunteer told me that someone wanted to hold one of the rabbits. She pointed to an older boy, maybe twelve or in his early teens, who came in later, sat off to the side, and hadn't said anything. Instantly I recognized. I had spotted him from the corner of my eye several times while I was cleaning and — I am very embarrassed to say — should have known. My own nephew was autistic, and had a special bond with cats.

Although Fiona was a bit worn out, and wanted to go home, I picked her up and told her that a very nice boy wanted to hold her. I brought Fiona over to him. He nestled her like she was his child. He gently put his chin on Fiona's soft fur. Fiona, I think, sensed that this person was very compassionate and needed a hug from a bunny. She nestled her head into his neck. I could tell she was very relaxed. The boy — or young man, I should say — smiled and closed his eyes but never uttered a word. I let them embrace for some time. After a while, he handed Fiona back to me and I put her in her carrier to go home.

Children and animals often have a very special bond. Innocence meets innocence. A child that lives in a world of silence may have even a stronger connection with animals, since they communicate so much through non-verbal signals. Seeing the two of them enjoy each others' company, two innocent beings who recognized the goodness in the other, was literally and figuratively a touching moment and it was without a doubt the high point of the program.

Strength Without Sympathy 

After work, a husband and wife are walking along a trail in Reston, Virginia. Ahead of them are a group of youths. Out of nowhere, a cat appears. A small cat, maybe six pounds. One of the guys in front of the couple tries to kick the cat. Not a small shove-aside, but a powerful kick with intent to hurt. The cat just barely escapes and darts off. Had the person made contact, the cat would have suffered broken ribs. The couple would have driven the cat to the vet. But if the couple was not there, the cat would likely have died slowly from the injuries.

25 miles away, two men spot an animal the same size as the cat. They shoot it. It may have been a clean shot, maybe not; the animal could flinch at the last second. In this case the killing or maiming is called a proud tradition. Afterward, the men may recount the experience with their friends and there will be not a trace of empathy for the animal.

In both instances, the animal's will to live or the joy that it got from life was not considered. In both instances, the animal may have had close companions that gave his life meaning, but no thought was given to this by the people who just wanted to kill the animal because they could.

Tuesday, June 21, 2005

The Aggression of Hunting 

They grow a lot of corn along the Potomac in Maryland, which attracts the deer. Which attracts the hunters, who enjoy killing them. Up the road, the Izaak Walton League releases "wild" turkeys out of their cages and shoots them. Some get killed by cars. One made it safely to the nearby animal sanctuary, where he now lives.

Some hunters didn't like it when the animal sanctuary came into existence. Fewer deer and other animals to pursue and kill. They let the sanctuary owners know they were angry. They knocked down the sanctuary's mailbox. The sanctuary replaced it with a stronger mailbox. The frustrated hunters knocked that down, too. The sanctuary built a third mailbox encased in concrete. So far that one's still standing.



They were, as far as they could tell, the only family on the block that opposed hunting. That made them a little nervous; they could tell they were "outsiders." During hunting season, at dusk, hunters would come onto their property, despite signs, and shine bright spotlights in an effort to kill more deer. The lights came right into the house. The family complained, but the hunters were indignant. The family got no help from local officials.



Boot camp at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. The firing range. You obeyed the drill sergeant. That was understood. A bunch of 18-year olds with M60's (the type of weapon Rambo used). When the sergeant gave a command, you did what he said. Period.

All morning, recruits shot at targets as instructed. The sergeant commanded them to cease fire. Silence. A deer, who had been crouched on the ground possibly for hours, and was probably scared to death, cautiously got up. From out of nowhere, dozens of shots. Against orders, the men couldn't contain themselves. "Hold your fire," the angry drill sergeant yelled. The fallen deer, full of bullet holes, was loaded into the back of a pickup truck and driven away.

Monday, June 20, 2005

It's Time to Stop Romanticizing Fishing 

To live in Minnesota and write about fishing in less then reverent tones is to act on the courage of one's convictions. But as this excerpt from an article in the Twin Cities Green Guide shows, fishing is no innocent pastime; it takes a terrible toll on fish and other wildlife.

Please note the paragraph on the fate of caught fish thrown back in the water.



In Minnesota, during the spring, fishing enthusiasts take to the lakes and rivers in their boats and to their icehouses in the winter. Fishing is a popular year-round activity, but it is not without controversy.

Fishing advocates point to "catch-and-release" as responsible fishing and as a way to conserve fish populations. After a fish is caught and released it may be hooked again and again, causing it more injuries and pain. Trout Unlimited's Charles Gauvin admits that it's possible to see fish that are battered and with bruised lips from being caught many times. According to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biologist Mike Buntjet, "I've seen fish with their maxillaries (lips) torn off, eyes missing and with flies and hooks stuck all over them."

Fishing advocates rationalize their actions by asserting that fish, being lower life forms, don't feel pain. Dr. Donald Broom, animal welfare advisor to the British government, states, "The scientific literature is quite clear. Anatomically, physiologically and biologically, the pain system in fish is virtually the same as in birds and animals."

Reduced to its basic elements, fishing involves impaling an animal on a hook, throwing it in the water where it will drown or be eaten by a bigger animal. The bigger animal is then pulled out of the water, its entire weight suspended from its mouth, where it is then clubbed, killed by knife, or allowed to suffocate. If the fish is fortunate, it may be released but is not assured of survival.

Even if the fish appear to survive their ordeal and are released, the odds are against them surviving. Lactic acid builds in fish's bodies as they try to escape. This causes their muscle cells to start decomposing from lack of oxygen. As a result, their chances of surviving are greatly decreased. A Canadian study found that fish exposed to the air for 60 seconds or more had a 72% mortality rate. Water provides fish with oxygen and helps to dissipate the high levels of lactic acid caused by struggling at the end of a hook. Other factors affect mortality as well. Cuts from fishing line, wounds from hooks and boat-side injuries all decrease a fish's chances for survival. Fish that bite bait often swallow the hook, resulting in internal injuries. In addition, the ingested hook may become encysted, making the fish more susceptible to deadly viral infections. Outdoors columnist Paul Vang, notes that "Releasing a mortally wounded fish isn't any different than shooting an elk and not recovering it."

Fishing is also dangerous for other wildlife as well. Every year anglers leave behind a trail of victims that includes birds, turtles, bats and other animals that suffer debilitating injuries or slowly starve to death after swallowing discarded fish hooks or becoming entangled in fishing line. Wildlife rehabilitators have treated birds poisoned by lead sinkers and otters that can't digest their food because their intestines are full of plastic lures. The loon, Minnesota's state bird, is especially susceptible to lead poisoning from ingesting sinkers. Waverly Traylor, a wildlife rehabilitator from Virginia Beach, Virginia, points out that "By far the greatest threat to the health and safety of waterfowl is not the hunter nor the polluted water, but actually the fishing tackle carelessly discarded by...fishermen and so-called sportsmen."

Fishing is not only bad for fish but for people as well. Minnesota has 6000 fishable lakes. Fish from 856 lakes and 51 streams in Minnesota have been tested for contaminants. According to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR), mercury is found in most fish tested from Minnesota lakes.

Fish and shellfish can accumulate extremely high levels of toxins (as much as nine million times that of the water in which they live) such as PCBs, mercury, lead and arsenic. These poisons can cause health problems ranging from kidney damage and impaired mental development to cancer and even death. Fish in some lakes and nearly half of the rivers which have been sampled contain PCBs.

Recent reports of toxaphene in lake trout taken from Lake Superior suggest a potential environmental health problem with this insecticide. Though banned in 1990, toxaphene, a mixture of over 670 chemicals, continues to be a problem in certain areas.  (full article...)



Researchers have produced abundant evidence that fish feel physical pain, and most likely emotional pain. But even without the science, just put yourself in their place; imagine what it's like to be impaled on a hook, struggling with all your might as you're repeatedly pulled out of the water. The trauma and fear would be unbearable. And if you've ever had your skin caught on a hook, you know what that's like. We may portray fishing as good clean fun, but it's really a dirty trick played on innocent creatures. From the fish's side, fishing is violent and terrifying, and often results in a slow, torturous death.

I used to fish. 75 percent of the fun was getting there, hanging out by the water — or on it — and spending some delightfully lazy time with family and friends. It hardly mattered if I caught anything. Recreational anglers: it may seem radical to give up your hobby, but when you think about it, it's remarkably easy. You can still get out into the fresh morning air bright and early, enjoy the stillness of a boat in the middle of a lake, and talk about sports or anything in the world with your buddies, or your sons. Bring a camera to take pictures of fish, turtles, birds, and wildlife. Admire all these animals, knowing that each one has a distinct personality, emotions, and a rich and complex life. Leave them be so you can enjoy their company — perhaps their spirit — again and again. Want some exercise? Try snorkeling. Or taking a hike around the lake. Or cleaning up the litter along the shore; that's a great way to combine a fun family activity and a good deed. You don't have to be cruel to have some of the best times of your life.



The Twin Cities Green Guide is a comprehensive set of articles that help you live harmoniously with nature and your fellow humans. It includes everything from home energy saving hints to sources of environmentally-friendly gifts to recommendations on enjoying Minnesota parks. The Green Pages section of the Green Guide lists Green businesses and organizations throughout Minnesota.

(Fishing article excerpt reprinted by permission)

Denial is Just Opposing Streams of Thought... 

I heard each of these anti-veganism defenses this week:

I would like to get these two factions together in a room to work it out.

Sunday, June 19, 2005

Some Pictures My Dad Took 

Here's a visitor who showed up on my parent's deck:



This goose lives on a pond near my parents' house. He likes to pose for the camera:



I'll show some more of my dad's wildlife photos in future posts. In the meantime...Happy Father's Day, Dad!

Putting The Alleviation of Suffering First 

Or, "Rescue the Rabbit Trapped in the Drainpipe Before Attending to My Headache"

Not that I go through this formula in my head all the time; like anyone, I'm often moved by the moment or go with my gut. But if I had to lay out very general guidelines for which creatures (including humans) I choose to help...

Of course, sometimes this means the beneficiaries (I hope) of my efforts to help are humans. They might be members of my own family or an unknown quantity of strangers halfway across the world.

But being human doesn't automatically put you at the top of the list. I'll take my companion animals to the vet. I'll acknowledge my neighbor's dismay at having his grass soiled by the stray cat, but my greater sympathies will lie with the lost pet who may have been abandoned by her human family, is probably frightened and hungry, and is possibly plagued by painful infections. I'll refuse to take a child to see an animal circus, no matter how badly he wants to go. He and I can have a great time at an animal sanctuary or the park; the elephants are kidnapped, beaten, and chained. When the child is older, he will learn the extent to which elephants in the circus are mistreated, and be horrified, and be thankful I never took him there.

If I did find myself in the proverbial scenario where I was forced to hit the pedestrian or the dog with my car, I imagine I would swerve to save the pedestrian. Although this may only indicate that we are naturally predisposed to help our own. Fortunately, up until now, I've been able to spare both the dog and the pedestrian, and help them and many other species, and most likely this will continue for the rest of my days. Especially considering that one of the most effective ways to help animals is simply to adopt a vegetarian diet, and thus avoid foods that, according to hundreds of studies, cause heart disease and cancer. That works out great: For no money or extra time, I can do a world of good for animals, and be healthier in the process — which lets me be more of a contributer to society in general.

What I like is that each of us helps who we can in our own way. We each have unique skills and access to various groups in need. The volunteers at the animal shelter and the soup kitchen are both alleviating suffering and increasing peace on earth. My veterinarian and physician are both healers, and all of the humans and animals in my household appreciate and feel the benefit of their efforts. The undercover investigators who videotape ugly human cruelties toward animals in slaughterhouses and research labs help us all; they inform us of victims we might not otherwise know about, and they expose parts of us that we sorely need to exorcise. Even seemingly tiny acts can be transformative: letting the spider live, or putting out a little house for the toads, cultivates a decency in us that we can compound and share without limit. So let's not spend too much time devising how to divide up our kindnesses, let's see how we can multiply them so that the entire world thrives.



"Until he extends the circle of his compassion to all living things, man will not himself find peace."
— Albert Schweitzer

"We and the beasts are kin."
— Ernest Thompson Seton

Saturday, June 18, 2005

Drink Milk...Gain Weight 

The dairy industry's highly visible "Drink Milk...Lose Weight" campaign, with its glossy, full-page magazine ads...

Eleven people! That's pathetic. On this one tiny study, paid for and conducted by groups with a vested interest in the outcome, the dairy industry is spending millions to tell us that drinking milk makes you lose weight. Talk about chutzpah. They should be sued and punished for fraud — again.

Meanwhile, a study by Harvard University of twelve thousand participants shows that boys who drink milk, even skim milk, gain weight, and that the more milk they drink, the heavier they get.

Of nine studies in the Journal of Nutrition in 2003, none found that consuming dairy led to weight loss. Published studies since then report the same thing.

This should be no surprise. As Dr. Michael Greger points out, "milk is designed by mother nature to start an 80-pound calf on her way to 1,400 pounds by her second birthday."

Meta-analyses show no correlation between dairy consumption and bone health. A number of published studies implicate dairy in diabetes, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, and breast cancer. Dairy is a leading allergen, and often removing it from one's diet clears up a range of health problems. Modern dairy production involves severe cruelties. Half of all dairy cows are lame by the time they're five years old. Cows too sick to walk are left to suffer and die. Veal — which most meat-eaters avoid due to ethical objections — is a by-product of dairy. There's no nutritional requirement for dairy. I'll give it this: it tastes good. Then again, so did the apple.

(References to all studies mentioned specifically or in aggregate provided upon request)



Related resources:

Silk Soy Milk

"Milk"—not just from cows, from the Somerset Medical Center (affiliated with the New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School)

Friday, June 17, 2005

A Friend Takes Flight (But the Employees Miss His Chirping) 

You don't really know a species until you enter into a relationship with one of its members. Until then, it's all abstract. (Studying animals, compiling statistics about them and so forth, is not the same thing; that's knowing about them, not knowing them.)

In this story from National Public Radio's All Things Considered, commentator Julie Zickefoose inches her way into an accidental but fruitful relationship with Paul, a resourceful sparrow trapped in the minimum security confines of a grocery store.

Lame Excuses for Cruelty (With Side Order of Snobism) 

Michael Ginor, co-owner of Hudson Valley Foie Gras, claims that force-feeding ducks to make foie gras is not cruel and that his factory should be allowed to operate so that jobs will not be lost.


Duck with broken bill from rough handling during force-feeding.
The force-feeding of ducks in foie gras facilities is so violently cruel, and the ducks are in such obvious physical and psychological misery from the isolation and invasive regime, that the activity should be ended immediately. It's animal abuse to an extreme. Foie gras ducks are forced to ingest far more food than they could ever take in naturally, which causes their livers to be engorged to several times normal size. The ducks, already without freedom of movement and water to swim in, suffer horribly. They have painful "fatty liver" disease. Their normally pristine feathers become encrusted with dirt and their own vomit. They develop infections and sores. Their spirit dies; they hang their heads and basically just exist, waiting to die, in their tiny prisons. They become so weak that they cannot fend off rodents, even as they're being eaten alive.

And Mr. Ginor claims this is not cruel.

As for the jobs that may be lost... When we banned the importing of cat and dog fur into the U.S., it may have cost some jobs. That's not a sufficient reason to perpetuate torture. The fact that someone is willing to pay for an activity doesn't make it moral, or worthy of preservation. The "we can't stop doing this or jobs will be lost" argument could be used to perpetuate any cruelties, of any magnitude, forever, as long as there's money in it. I'm willing to help displaced employees in other ways, even if it raises my taxes. I realize that some low-level workers might have these awful jobs just because they need a job, not because they get any enjoyment from inflicting suffering on helpless creatures.

In the aggregate, no jobs will be lost. People will still eat. For every bit of foie gras they give up, they'll have a different appetizer. The producers of the alternatives will pick up the slack. They'll be hiring. The employees, owners, and suppliers for foie gras factories have had years of advance warning that they'll have to find new jobs. That's far more time than anyone I know was given when their company went bankrupt, lost a major contract, or had jobs eliminated by a merger or military base closing. When Atkins declared, incorrectly, that carbs were the weight-gain villain, it had a far bigger impact on jobs than will ending the production of foie gras.

Mr. Ginor dismisses those opposed to foie gras as hampered by tender mercies, too delicate to eat a diseased liver distended almost to the point of exploding. To him, animal cruelty is a concern of unsophisticated sentimentalists. Forget that the ducks' lives are reduced to standing in place on a concrete slab or metal grating, the unbearable monotony only interrupted when the tube is plunged down their throat. None of this matters to Mr. Ginor. He apparently considers foie gras to be so indispensable, so crucial to modern society, that it justifies operating torture factories. I'm sure Ginor figures that a little torture shouldn't ruin a nice meal. "Unless, of course," Ginor says, snottily, "madame would prefer the vegetable reduction on her asparagus instead?"

Madame would like a gourmet meal without atrocities. If Mr. Ginor doesn't know how to do that, he should consult with Millenium in San Francisco or Candle 79 in New York. Even mainstream high-end restaurants like Vidalia in Washington, D.C. will serve up a sumptuous, first-class vegan meal on request. Madame would like the reduction of suffering.


A force-fed duck who choked to death on his own regurgitation, lying dead in his pen.
Mr. Ginor also claims (or whines) that people are opposed to foie gras because it's eaten by the rich. Two words: Get Real. Supporters of cockfighting complain that opposition to their cruel non-sport is based on prejudice of rural southern culture. Some Jewish organizations tried to characterize opposition to the suffering — so extreme your jaw drops — at the AgriProcessors kosher slaughter plant as anti-Semitic. Are the profiteers and participants in animal cruelty in total denial? Or are they just trying to evade accountability? "Never mind the cows with their guts spilling on the floor, thrashing wildly in pain; or the drugged rooster outfitted with blades, in his own horror movie, surrounded by agitators who want to see blood and death; or the ducks, half-dead from the utter deprivation and painful regime we put them through each day. No, the real problem is that the animal rights people are jealous of our customers or biased against us." It's a lame, but tried-and-true method when you have no defense for your actions but don't have the guts — the character; the moral fiber — to own up to them. Instead you try to divert attention by attributing ridiculous motivations to those who expose your shameful activities. Please note, Mr. Ginor. Some of my best friends are rich. I've had foie gras myself. Many years ago, to my great shame. What I hate is vicious, deliberate, brutal animal cruelty, and disgusting lies to cover it up.

(Thanks to www.VeganFreaks.org for the inspiration for this post.)

Photos: Farm Sanctuary.

Thursday, June 16, 2005

Thought for the Day: Fur From Broken Animals 

"Many years ago, I was in a Broadway show and I had to wear a fox fur around my shoulders. One day my hand touched one of the fox's legs. It seemed to be in two pieces. Then it dawned on me.... her leg had probably been snapped in two by the steel trap that had caught it."
--Bea Arthur

Jesus: Compassionate Extremist 

Jesus: Extremist
Jesus would be called an extremist today, his ideas too threatening to the status quo. His criticisms of seeking wealth, and his interference with commerce (ritual slaughter) at the Temple would be characterized as anti-choice and anti-consumer. Vested interests who could be hurt if people followed his simple life and compassionate views would find or invent inconsistencies in His message and never fail to mention the company he kept (prostitutes and beggars). His tender observations of sparrows and hens would get him labeled a "sentimentalist."

God Represented Himself as a Peacenik Revolutionary
According to the scriptures, God didn't send down a CEO as His emissary, His essence. He sent a man who eschewed pride, gluttony, and riches — the things upon which our modern economy is based. He advocated unpopular, upsetting views. He was on the fringe. But His words had power, and the vested interests had to respond. As today, they responded not by convincingly defending their transgressions but by killing the messenger.

This Is Far More Important Than the Da Vinci Code
Jesus was persecuted and crucified for forcing people to think about the compassion they bypassed for greed and selfishness.

Not Learning by Example
The defining characteristic of Jesus' life on earth was his unwavering dedication to sacrifice on behalf of the weak and powerless. Real, meaningful sacrifice, with beneficiaries other than the sacrificer; not "I'm giving up candy for Lent" sacrifice. This demonstration on how to live was totally lost on the population, and we continue to vigorously resist any curbs on how we destroy the earth in pursuit of more material goods and hedonistic pleasures.

We Do the Exact Opposite of What Jesus Did — In His Name
Throughout history, people calling themselves Christians have exploited blacks, women, children, and foreigners for economic gain. Each of those victimized groups has had some degree of liberation. Animals are now the most exploited group in the modern world. They suffer mightily because we like how their killed flesh tastes and their dead skin feels. The products from their suffering are mass-marketed and advertised everywhere, all the time. Business models, growth forecasts, government policies, and vast sectors of the economy are based on making the least powerful suffer so the most powerful can get richer.

The "Us First"-Driven Life
In Jesus' life and death, it's as though God said, "Get it? You sacrifice so those below you won't suffer from want or neglect or heartache or loneliness." Instead, we seem to have interpreted Jesus' sacrifice in the most selfish way possible. We're all too eager to accept the rewards but not the responsibility; believing that Jesus died for us, but not lifting a finger to carry on the legacy and keep the chain of compassion going. By limiting compassion to our own species, we confound God's will, but by showing compassion to all species we extend God's will.

Jesus Gave Up His Life; We Make Others Give Up Their Lives
As God ministers to us, we, created in His image, are to minister to Creation. But we humans, enamored as we are with someone sacrificing on our behalf, refuse to emulate the model; we will not give up the most superficial pleasures — a hamburger or fur trim — to save animals from suffering.

We Can Honor His Sacrifice By Acting In Kind
In effect, we treat Jesus as another resource: "What can He do for us?" The question Christians must ask is "What can we do for Him?" (And the devout are obliged to ask of their God, "What can we can we do for You?" And the secular must ask, "What can I do for the world?") What you can do is be merciful to the entirety of Creation. For example, to the hen that Jesus praised for her character. He never mentioned how the hen tastes or speculated on how to get more eggs out of her. He admired her God-like love for her chicks. Let her express that love, and let her chicks feel that love. Look upon God's beauty in the form of a hen and her brood, and know that to those small animals you can be like Jesus — a benevolent and humbled servant. Add value to Creation rather than merely consuming it. Continue the chain of compassion.

(Thanks to Rhonda Cunningham for some of the concepts for this post.)

Wednesday, June 15, 2005

Thought for the Day 

"I have witnessed and tended to calves in rodeos who became paralyzed and whose tracheas were totally or partially severed. Slamming them to the ground has caused rupture of several internal organs leading to a slow and agonizing death."
--Dr. E.J. Finocchino

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Attention, Pro-Lifers 

To be truly pro-life, not just pro-human life, go vegetarian -- or vegan. In addition to preventing the brutal slaughter of 2000 animals in your lifetime, you'll be reducing suffering, which may be even more important, and a more compelling obligation for us, as responsible, loving stewards of Creation. Conditions for the vast majority of farm animals in the industrialized world are so rotten that they never know one moment of peace or happiness.

Simply to satisfy our taste buds, we kill millions of newborn chicks each year. On their first day of life, we suffocate them, grind them up, or let them die by exposure, starvation, and dehydration. They are hatched in incubators and never meet their mother. Jesus compared the love of a hen for her chicks to God's love for us. Hens and roosters have been known to sacrifice their own comfort on behalf of another. We make their lives miserable, stuffing them in tiny squalid surroundings, cutting off their beaks, preventing them from accomplishing any of their basic needs. We even take motherhood away from them. Instead of carefully building a nest, turning over her eggs, and talking to her developing chicks, battery hens' eggs fall through the slatted floor and roll away on a conveyer belt. Surely we can give these bright and gentle birds a better fate than this. It's in your power to do so. Be really pro-life—go vegan!



Resources:

The Christian Vegetarian Association

All-Creatures

Thanks to Rhonda Cunningham for the concept for this post. In her spare time, Rhonda looks after about 100 stray dogs and cats.

The Depth of Our Meanness 

The truck carrying this cow was unloaded at Walton Stockyards in Kentucky on a September morning. After the other animals were removed from the truck, she was left behind, unable to move. The stockyard workers beat and kicked her in the face, ribs and back. They used the customary electric prods in her ear to try to get her out of the truck, but still she did not move. The workers then tied a rope around her neck, tied the other end to a post in the ground, and drove the truck away. The cow was dragged along the floor of the truck and fell to the ground, landing with both hind legs and her pelvis broken. She remained in this state until 7:30 that evening.

The cow lay in the hot sun crying out for the first three hours. Periodically, when she urinated or defecated, she used her front legs to drag herself along the gravel roadway to a clean spot. She also tried to crawl to a shaded area but could not move far enough. Altogether she managed to crawl a painful 13-14 yards. The stockyard employees would not allow her any drinking water; the only drinking water she received was given to her by Jessie Pierce, a local animal rights activist, who had been contacted by a woman who witnessed the incident. Jessie arrived at noon. After receiving no cooperation from stockyard workers, she called the Kenton County police. A police officer arrived but was instructed by his superiors to do nothing; he left at 1 p.m.

The stockyard operator informed Jessie at 1 p.m. that he had obtained permission from the insurance company to kill the cow but would not do so until Jessie left. Although doubtful that he would keep his word, Jessie left at 3 p.m. She returned at 4:30 p.m. and found the stockyard deserted. Three dogs were attacking the cow, who was still alive. She had suffered a number of bite wounds, and her drinking water had been removed. Jessie contacted the Kentucky State Police. Four officers arrived at about 5:30 p.m. State trooper Jan Wuchner wanted to shoot the cow but was told that a veterinarian should kill her. The two veterinarians at the facility would not euthanize the cow, claiming that, in order to preserve the value of the meat, she could not be destroyed. The butcher eventually arrived at 7:30 p.m. and did shoot the cow. Her body was purchased for $307.50. (Usually animals who are bruised or crippled or who are found dead are considered unfit for human consumption and are used for pet food.)

When the stockyard operator was questioned earlier in the day by a reporter from The Kentucky Post, he stated, "We didn't do a damned thing to it," and referred to the attention given the cow by humane workers and police as "bullcrap." He laughed throughout the questioning, saying he found nothing wrong with the way the incident was handled.

This is not an isolated case. It is so common that animals in this condition are known in the meat industry as "downers." After PETA brought much-needed attention to this issue, the Kenton County Police Department adopted a policy requiring that all downed animals be immediately euthanized, whether they are on the farm, in transit, or at the slaughterhouse. Sadly, other law-enforcement agencies don't have such policies and downed animals continue to suffer everywhere. It is up to the public to demand change, and it is up to consumers to refuse to purchase the products of this miserable industry.



We are being viciously cruel to these animals. When we treat them decently, they show their gratitude in every way of which they're capable. They lick our faces. They purposefully walk over to us to be near us because they like our company. But we should not be motivated to treat animals with respect and kindness solely by what kind of thanks we may receive. When we offer a thirsty animal a drink of water, we have done the right thing and we know it. There's no doubt. We've made the world more peaceful. Helping others in need is its own reward.

And what of the farmer that laughed about how the injured cow was treated. Infuriates you, doesn't it? But hold up a minute. Is that nervous laughter? Is it nervous, hiding something? You might think that it's not, that the guy is just heartless to the core. Heartless, yes. To the core, no. People become conditioned to inflicting suffering. They become hardened to it. But deep down inside, there is still that child that petted a rabbit, that boy who cried when the family pet died. It is impossible to look an animal in the eye and not have something deep down register a connection. After years of suppressing emotions, we become very good at pretending that it doesn't affect us. But it does. Many farm and slaughterhouse workers take out their frustration — that they might not realize they have — on the animals. They may even be angry at the animals for bringing on guilt. This is all at the subconscious level — usually. Superficially, it's easier to build an emotional chasm between one's self and the animals one torments and kills. That way you don't get too close to them. You don't let any feelings develop for them. But this is an impossible strategy. At some deep level, you don't lose that connection. The cow hurts and needs help. You might distance yourself from the cow, tell yourself it's just business, in order to avoid identifying with her pain, in order to prevent feeling sorry for her. Because once you feel sorry for her, you can no longer continue the cruelty.

Please do everything you can to avoid buying products of cruelty, for that is the most effective way to stop it. This site, this site, and a hundred other sites on the Net can help you transition to a more humane diet.


Related Resource:

The Pig Farmer -- One of my favorite stories. If you haven't read it, I highly recommend it.

Monday, June 13, 2005

Your Ignorance is Not Bliss for the Animals 

From VeganFreaks:

This happens to me all the time:

Curious omnivore (CO): So, why are you a vegan?

Me: Well, there are a few reasons, but mostly it is a question of ethics.

CO: How so?

Me: Well, the conditions that animals are kept in to produce eggs, meat, and cheese are deplorable.

CO: Oh, sh**, wait. No no no! Don’t tell me. I’d rather not know! (taking a bite of meat)

They’d rather not know because if they did, they might have to think twice about eating animal products. This is the ultimate in consumer hubris: as long as you can continue to consume without knowing or thinking about the conditions of exploitation involved in production, you can fool yourself into thinking that your conscience is free.

Yet, oddly, some of these people see fit to call me an extremist. Me? I’m just living by my conscience. If I’m to be true to my ethics, this is what I must do. Yes, it meant giving up blue cheese (which I loved, though which now seems gross), ice cream (though Soy Delicious rocks my socks), and cream in my coffee (soy milk works just fine, thanks) but these were the only choices to make since I couldn't in any way justify daily consumption of products that caused so very much suffering. Once I made myself think about it (which took some time, admittedly) there was no other way to go.

I knew, and couldn't un-know.



VeganFreaks.org chronicles the trials, tribulations, successes, and joys of two vegan pioneers living in a not-yet vegan world. Topics run the gamut from frivolous to deadly serious. The writing is from the heart, immediate and engaging. (Warning: contains profanity)

Where's Your Apology, Center for Consumer Freedom? 

You said on your web site that Virgil Butler, who has provided details about how horribly Tyson treats its animals and workers, lied about his military record. Turns out that was just a lie by Tyson. Mr. Butler obtained copies of his records from the U.S. Army and displayed them on the Internet.

Maybe you should stop believing Tyson and start believing Mr. Butler. And you owe him an apology.

Two more things.

  1. Even if he totally falsified his military history, all his claims about Tyson are easily verifiable.

  2. You know you're smearing an honest man's good name. You know the animals that your member companies grow and slaughter suffer — by the billions. How do you sleep at night?

Sunday, June 12, 2005

Attention, Environmentalists 

Interested in saving more wilderness? Go vegan.

Author John Robbins, who's researched the issue quite a bit, says that the average vegan requires 1/6 of an acre to satisfy his or her food requirements for a year, and the average meat-eater requires 20 times that much land. I've read other estimates that are in that ballpark. Even if you took the low-end estimate and cut it in half, the reduction in land required for farming drops dramatically as you remove meat and dairy products from your diet.

And reclaiming all this land costs you — NOTHING! In fact, if you work it right, it could cost you less than nothing!

And what can we do with all that land that we no longer need to feed us? One of the most attractive and least expensive options is to do nothing. Let it revert to its wild state. Let nature manage it. (Note that the Ivory-Billed Woodpecker, long thought to be extinct, was recently rediscovered in a remote Arkansas swamp that was left alone and pristine.)



Related resource:

What is Vegan, from the Twin Cities Green Guide

Superiority Complex 

Are we superior to animals? What's the criteria? Humans have created great art but we are destroying the planet. The Black Plague was spread by fleas, but our garbage attracted them. If we were to perish, life for most animals on earth would improve, but if spiders or termites perished, we'd perish with them.

I'm routinely humbled by animals' capacity to trust us and be very loving even after suffering the most horrid and violent abuses.

From a Judeo-Christian perspective, animals are superior to us in the sense that they're unfallen; they're without sin.

There is one very important aspect in which we are the superior species. I'll let Reverend Andrew Linzey take over from here. He's speaking primarily to Christians, and quotes from scripture, but the concepts are non-denominational...

If it is true that this paradigm of generous, costly service is at the heart of the Christian proclamation, then it must also be the paradigm for the exercise of human dominion over the animal world. We do well to remind ourselves of that ethical imperative arising from early Christian reflection upon the work and person of Jesus:

Take to heart among yourselves that what you find in Christ Jesus: He was in the form of God, yet he laid no claim to equality with God, but made himself nothing, assuming the form of a slave. Bearing the human likeness, sharing the human lot, he humbled himself, and was obedient even to the point of death, death on a cross. (Phil 2.5-9 REB)

If we "take to heart" this pattern of generosity we can perceive moral meaning to our relationship of power over the non-human Creation. The pattern of obligation disclosed by Christ makes no appeal to equality. The obligation is always and everywhere on the "higher" to sacrifice for the "lower," for the strong, powerful, and rich to give to those who are vulnerable, poor, or powerless. This is not some by-theme of the moral example of Jesus, it is rather central to the demands of the kingdom, indeed those who minister to the needs of the vulnerable and the weak minister to Christ himself:

I was hungry and you give me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was sick and you visited me, I was in prison and you came to me. (Matt. 25.35.37; RSV)

In this respect, it is the shear vulnerability and powerlessness of animals, and correspondingly our absolute power over them which strengthens and compels the response of moral generosity. I suggest that we are to be present to Creation as Christ is present to us. When we speak of human superiority we speak of such a thing properly only and in so far as we speak not only of Christlike lordship but also of Christlike service. There can be no lordship without service and no service without lordship. Our special value in Creation consists in being of special value to others.

Horse Sense 

Refreshing truth in broadcasting: sports show host Bram Weinstein is skeptical of racehorse owners' claims that their horses "enjoy" the winner's circle as though they're caught up in the celebrity aspect of it. Mr Weinstein posits that the horse is enjoying not being whipped and having to run like lightening. I find this view to be a welcome change, and probably much closer to the truth than the anthropocentric delusions of the horse racing world.

Ten-to-one Bram Weinstein is not an animal rights guy, but I like his show. In the DC area, you can catch him weeknights from 7 to 9 pm on SportsTalk 980.

Friday, June 10, 2005

Love Birds 

Outside my office building are two doves who do everything as a couple. They swoop down from their perch on the roof, fly around the perimeter of the courtyard, and alight on the holly bush. Then they're back up, circling, lifting, making figures, and returning to land on their perch.

Every day they do this. Far be it from me to know precisely what it feels like to propel yourself into the air whenever you get the hankering, soar along the edges of buildings, pick a landing spot, and take off again. Maybe, having the gift of flight, the open sky beckons. Maybe there are some good updrafts for smooth sailing. Maybe it's just fun. (Did you know birds play? I do know this — those two birds have each other.)

How Does Cruelty Start? 

A dusty parking lot in Mexico

A bunch of boys hanging around

A confused rat runs to a wooden box for shelter

He gets his snout stuck between two slats

One boy picks up a two-by-four

He lifts it above his head,

With all his might, he smashes the rat's nose

The other boys find that amusing

All except one...



The path to world peace starts with helping out one rat. And — I must add — helping out his abuser.

Dear Angus Phillips: Do Fish Feel Pain? 

Dear Mr. Phillips,

Do fish feel pain when a barbed hook slices through their skin? Does it hurt them when their body is jerked and pulled by a hook stuck in their mouth?

Is it particularly painful and exhausting for the fish if it struggles against the hook for a long time, and is periodically pulled out of the water? If so, would it be kinder to kill the caught fish immediately rather putting it back in the water and subjecting it to the same torment over and over?

What about when they try to breathe out of water? When they flop around and "gasp" with their gills, trying to take in air? Does that hurt? Do fish feel fear?

If anglers were to come to an understanding that fish feel pain like a dog, would that change how they view the activity? Would it seem less wholesome?

Most marine biologists conclude that fish feel pain.

If we're not sure, are we obligated to give the fish the benefit of the doubt, lest we cause them to suffer as a result of our wishful thinking?

People who live with or among fish consistently report that their fish recognize them, enjoy stimulation of various sorts, like to play, and show signs of affection and sadness. Do those emotional capabilities compound the pain? Might it be terrifying to be pulled by an embedded hook, against your will, out of the water, where you can't breathe?

Is it possible for fathers and sons to bond without willfully hurting animals?

I appreciate your calls for conservation and moderation in your columns.

Sincerely,

...

(Angus Phillips is the "Outdoor" columnist for the Washington Post)



Related Resource:

The Fresh Water Tackle Box

Thursday, June 09, 2005

A Very Simple Basis For Animal Cruelty Laws... 

...which, when you get right down to it, are legal rights:

The couch doesn't care if it's mistreated.

The cat does.

Wednesday, June 08, 2005

Big Dairy Lies, The Government Lies, PETA Tells the Truth 

You may not like some PETA campaigns, and there are some I'm not keen on either, but I think this one's right on the money. Read on...

The California "Happy Cow" commercials are fraudulent and manipulative. It's not just the lies — California dairy cows grazing in the grass, calves nuzzling with their mothers, sleeping on comfortable beds of straw — but the nature and intention of the lies. What makes them so reprehensible is that they are hiding massive cruelties and fooling consumers into supporting practices that they would rather not support. And your taxes are helping to pay for those lies. Consistently, in polls, people of every political persuasion convey that they want farm animals to be treated humanely. The Happy Cow ads give that impression. The California Milk Advisory Board (CMAB), intentionally shows happy cows instead of the horrid realities of California dairy operations: painfully distended udders, dirt instead of grass, newborns separated from mothers who cry for weeks afterward, veal pens that confine and weaken calves during their five month life.

This page shows the stark contrast between the fantasy in the Happy Cow commercials and the hard, prison-like life of the great majority of California dairy cows. For instance, look at the top photo, from the California Myth Advisory Board, showing a calf with his grandmother. Compare it to the bottom photo, showing the unhappy fate of sick, i.e., unprofitable calves on California dairy farms. No sprinkler baths for this guy. No medicine, no caring. No nothing. And Grandma was killed long ago.

PETA and John Robbins, author of The Food Revolution, sued the CMAB for false advertising, against which California has very strict laws. They also petitioned the Federal Trade Commission. No controversial "Got beer?" ads or billboards of prostate cancer patients. They used the legal system. That's what it's there for, right? No class-action suits, no monetary motive. Guess what? Turns out the CMAB is allowed to lie — legally. That's right. Since they're the marketing arm of the California Department of Agriculture, they can tell you whatever they want, and they're immune from lawsuits. In other words, through taxes, you involuntarily pay for your government to lie to you, and mislead you into unwittingly supporting animal cruelty and possibly endangering your health (from consuming the dubiously healthy product more than you would otherwise, and suffering the consequences of massive groundwater pollution). In this respect the CMAB is like federal animal research labs and sanctuaries.

PETA's "You Decide" campaign drives home the ugly truth to citizens. Short on editorializing, long on presenting actual — not carefully staged, choreographed, and technology-altered — pictures that are representative of the piss-poor conditions we give most dairy cows in this country, and even more so in California. Volunteers on the street wearing full-body video screens that show everyday dairy scenes, and "You Decide" billboards get right to the point and take it to the people. The TV commercials that will be playing in California cities are understated; there are disgusting cruelties and tortures that are left out.

Let's just say for a minute that you strongly feel we need to eat dairy products to be healthy (disregarding the fact that half the world is allergic to these products). Or, maybe even better, let's say that while you don't feel it's necessary to drink milk and eat cheese to have strong bodies, you derive great enjoyment from ice cream, and sometimes feel like saying "thank you, cows." Is this how we thank them? By separating mother and calf, by giving them mud instead of grass to lie down on, by pumping them up with hormones that give them mastitis infections, and by trucking them without food or water to the sloppy accident-prone slaughterhouse when their milk production drops into "unprofitable," i.e., normal, range? Surely we can do better than that. Cows are gentle creatures. They like to be petted on the nose. They'll nudge you for attention. They're dedicated mothers. We're learning they have complex emotions and social structures. They know fear and sadness. Why can't we give them a tiny bit of our charity? Why do we have to treat them with meanness and cruelty that edges into brutality? And lie about it?

Now I wonder, why isn't the so-called "Center for Consumer Freedom" up in arms about the People's government and food suppliers hoodwinking them — with their own money? It's because the CCF's clients make out just fine if consumers don't know how their food is made. Taking the public's money and using it to lie to them about something they care about, and then shutting off legal recourse — that's blatantly anti-consumer and anti-freedom. But, you see, groups like the CCF don't care about consumers and freedom. They just want your money. And they'll tolerate lies just fine if it means more money in their pockets. Of course, they don't want the cows to have freedom, but they want their own freedom — from anti-cruelty laws. Things you wouldn't do to your dog — or to a baby cow — in a million years, their members do a million times a year to animals; legally, without fear of penalty. Yes, I know PETA doesn't want you to eat cows. (Although to be fair, I'll bet one hundred percent of their members consider ending the cows' suffering to be a more urgent issue than not killing them, and I hope to God people would agree with those priorities.) But with the "You Decide" campaign, PETA is the pro-consumer, pro-freedom catalyst, exposing the greed-driven deception of the CMAB, and letting you see for yourself what they and the Agriculture Department are afraid to show you.

Here's more about the "You Decide" campaign: www.unhappycows.com/.

Remember — your tax dollars help fund both the cruelty and the deception. Also note that most hamburger is the ground-up remains of these cows. You can help make things right: www.unhappycows.com/wycd.asp.



Resources:

PETA's complaint to the Federal Trade Commission

Excerpts:

"Contrary to the depictions in the Happy Cows ads, the vast majority of California dairy cows...are not typically permitted to roam freely in grass-covered, pastures of rolling hills and shade trees, but are kept on dry lots of urine- and dung-fouled dirt (urine- and dung-fouled mud at some times of the year), and sometimes concrete. According to a University of California-Davis study, because of the expense of real estate in California, dry lot farming was developed and is the predominate method of keeping dairy cows today. 'Dry lots allow for a more intensive system of milk production than traditional pasture-based systems.' (Dairy Care Practices, University of California-Davis, 2d Edition, June 1998"

"The result of dry lot farming is that California dairy cows are kept in larger numbers in smaller areas than anywhere else in the country. In 1998, the national average dairy herd size was 60 cows; California herds averaged 650 cows. And the herd sizes are growing; by last year, the average had ballooned to 720 cows. Currently, a number of operations in the state milk as many as several thousand cows each day."

"A significant number of cows arrive at slaughterhouses throughout the country unable to stand. Whether it is because they are injured, diseased, crippled, or simply too weak to support themselves, these cows suffer greatly as a result of their difficult lives. Invariably, the highest percentage of downer cows arriving at slaughterhouses are dairy cows. Among the reasons for this are the intense difficulties and dangers associated with a life of constant milk production. Dairy cows are forced to produce significantly larger amounts of milk than their bodies are designed for. Nutrients, such as calcium and magnesium, that would otherwise be used for the cows' own nutritional needs, are diverted to the milk the cows produce. As a result, cows often suffer from brittle, broken bones, milk fever or other diseases, or emaciation and weakness to the point that they cannot even stand up."

Soy Delicious Ice Cream

Double Rainbow Soy Cream

Tofutti Cuties

More Tofutti Cuties

Boca Burgers

Regular folks discuss veggie burgers

Tofutti "Better Than Cream Cheese". (My wife wouldn't eat any non-dairy cream cheese before this. Non-vegetarians like it, too.)

More Tofutti Cream Cheese, from the Bismark, North Dakota Seventh-Day Adventist Church

Drink Milk, Gain Weight

Animals Were Harmed 

During the filming of "My Friend Flicka," two horses died from preventable accidents, according to eyewitnesses. In one case, the horse died from becoming entagled in a 30-foot rope around her neck, panicking, falling and breaking her neck. The California penal code prohibits tethering an animal in such a manner.

According to witnesses, no one from the American Humane Association (AHA), the group that declares "no animals were harmed," did anything to stop the scene. Once news of this tragedy became public, the AHA confirmed that a second horse had died two weeks earlier from a similar accident.

Don't trust the AHA seal of approval. The AHA does not monitor the training of animals or their living and transport conditions. Their guidelines are vague and they rarely file formal complaints against studios or production houses. They actively defend the use of animals in entertainment. They are paid by the Screen Actors Guild, the very industry they're monitoring, so there is an inherent conflict of interest. The entertainment industry's self-policing its use of animals is a sham, rigged to err on the side of profit.

Primetime Deception 

ABC's Primetime Live recently deceived viewers and did a disservice to animals by showing off a 5-year old chimp named Cody as an example of a well-trained ape. What the show did not reveal is that Cody's trainer, Sidney Yost, has a record of felony and misdimeanor convictions, and is under investigation for numerous violations of the Animal Welfare Act.

The segment also failed to tell viewers that brutal physical and psychological punishment is the norm in the wild animal training industry. This is thoroughly documented. In other words, the media once again made practices against animals that are in reality quite mean and violent look cute and harmless.

Experts in primatology, such as Jane Goodall, point out that primate "actors" are typically stolen from their families at a young age, grow up without their normal social structure, and are forced through fear, intimidation, and beatings to perform "scenes" and "tricks" that they don't want to do. Like all primatologists, she vigorously opposes the use of primates in entertainment.

When you see a "funny" commercial with chimps, please realize that the animals were probably horribly mistreated and are living in entirely unsuitable conditions. There's no reason for this practice to continue. It is akin to child labor or child slavery. But it continues because there's money in it. It will stop if you and others — once aware of the truth — complain about it. The email contact for Primetime Live is abcnews.magazines@abc.com

Related link and case study: Maybe We Devolved

Tuesday, June 07, 2005

Starved for Mercy 

The head of a nunnery in the Bronx is intentionally starving a group of feral cats that the nuns have fed for many years. In addition, over the years, volunteers have caught, spayed and neutered, and released the cats one by one, so that their population would fall gradually and humanely. This tried-and-true method -- trap-neuter-return, or "TNR" -- has been practiced successfully around the world. It reduces feral cat populations while cultivating a communal not adversarial relationship between humans and cats.

But Mother Superior has no interest in the cats' welfare. She just wants them gone. So she is starving them. The cats have not been fed in five days.

What a wonderful example of Christian love.

Here's the story, from Neighborhood Cats, a New York City coalition of cat advocates:

(June 7, 2005) Newly elected Pope Benedict XVI's well-known love of
stray cats apparently is not shared by the Dominican Nuns of the Corpus
Christi Monastery in the Bronx, New York. The Mother Superior has ordered the
removal of seven feral cats who are almost all neutered, rabies
vaccinated and have lived on the monastery's five acres for the past 8 years.

In a decision backed by the Archdiocese of NY, the plan is to first try to
force the cats to leave by withholding all food and starving them. Then if
they don't go on their own, the resident Sisters will trap them and hand them
over to the city. Shelter workers would be forced to euthanize the cats
because they are feral and unadoptable and have nowhere else to be
placed.

The Vicar of the Religious Office for the Archdiocese, Sister Helen
C., stated, "my compassion does not extend to these animals" and "they will
be removed eventually, one way or another."

"The plan is not only cruel for depriving these cats of their long-
time home and causing their suffering and likely deaths, it is ineffective
feral cat population control," said Bryan Kortis, Executive Director of
Neighborhood Cats, a leading feral cat organization and a member of the
Mayor's Alliance for NYC's Animals. "Maintaining neutered feral
colonies, using a method known as Trap-Neuter-Return (TNR), is the only proven
way to reduce feral numbers in the long term. Otherwise, new unneutered cats
will simply replace the ones removed and the cycle of suffering and killing
will go on indefinitely."

Over the past eight years, at their own expense, volunteers have
removed nine cats from the grounds of the monastery and placed them in homes.
The cats too wild to be adopted were neutered and returned, stopping their
reproduction, and were then fed by the nuns. Now, however, the nuns and
the Archdiocese refuse to even meet with animal advocates to discuss the
situation.

To protest this heartless and ill-guided assault on the cats, please
contact the Corpus Christi Monastery and the Archdiocese of NY by phone,
email or fax (see below.) Let them know we expect more from our
religious leaders than pointless cruelty towards innocent animals:

Corpus Christi Monastery
phone: 718-328-6996
fax: 718-328-1974
email: nunsop.bronx2@verizon.net

Archdiocese of NY
phone: 212-371-1000 (ask for Public Relations or the Vicar of the
Religious Office)
fax: 212-826-6020
email: contactus@archny.org

Act now! The cats have not been fed for five days and counting!!

From www.nunsopbronx.homestead.com:
"The DOMINICAN NUNS of Corpus Christi Monastery, Bronx, New York, are a
monastic community dedicated to a life of prayer and penance for the
preaching mission of the Dominican Order and for the salvation of
souls."

For more on Trap-Neuter-Return: www.neighborhoodcats.org

A Catholic friend of mine had a fruitless phone conversation with Sister Helen, who defended cutting off the cats' food by saying that the monastery's priority is humans and that the cats "are only animals, after all."

As far as I can tell, the cats have caused no harm to anyone, and I am sure they have been a source of pleasure and an outlet for kindness for some of the nuns with more gentle souls.

Here is my letter to Sister Helen:

Dear Sister Helen C. And Followers Of Christ,

"Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven." Our priority on earth is doing God's will, which means having mercy, which means having mercy on any creature that benefits from mercy and suffers from indifference.

If you consider your priority to be lifting humans from depravity to redemption, then show by example how we can be more compassionate stewards of the earth rather than coldhearted and selfish.

The feral cats sharing their small patch of earth with you, each an indirect victim of human ignorance and negligence, eking out a life in the inhospitable city environment, through the grace of God and — up to now — human charity, are made by the same Creator as us, and declared Very Good by God.

"Not to hurt our humble brethren is our first duty to them
   but to stop there is not enough: we have a higher mission
— to be of service to them whenever they require it"
  -- Saint Francis

Pope John Paul had a dream, that he said moved him like no other, in which a mother cat and her kittens walked the city streets in search of shelter and kindness. They were rejected by everyone, including churchgoers, until they finally found solace with a poor old woman who took them in and fed them. What is Pope John Paul, looking down from heaven, thinking now?

Very Respectfully,

...

Monday, June 06, 2005

An Invitation to Pro-Animal Welfare, Anti-Animal Rights People 

I'll assume you hate animal rights but are a firm believer in animal welfare. Furthermore, I'll assume that you advocate animal welfare because you think it's right and fair that animals be treated with respect, and have their basic -- maybe even not-so-basic -- needs provided for, even as we use them for food, clothing, and research. I'll assume you totally reject the notion of animal rights and get annoyed with animal rights activists.

Guess what? On a practical level, you agree with 90 percent of the animal rights platform.

The most urgent, highly publicized campaigns at almost any animal rights organization, across the board, have to do with animal welfare.

Animal welfare is treated as a joke by almost all the large institutions using animals. They don't just ignore animal welfare; they obliterate it.

Take factory farms. They suppress all the animals' needs. They crush healthy newborns. Or drag them away from their mothers and put them in a crate for the rest of their lives. The animals have no opportunity to walk around, develop companionship, or sleep comfortably. They're confined in prison-like tiny cages. Their world is metal and concrete. They never feel the grass or feel the sun. Their treatment would result in a felony conviction in most states if done by a private citizen.

Birds, which make up 90 percent of farm animals, are not even required to be insensible to pain at the time they're slaughtered. Those animals that are covered by the rudimentary protections of the Humane Slaughter Act frequently feel the full brunt of pain anyway, because slaughterhouse line speeds are so fast, inadequate stunning is inevitable. As many as ten percent of cows and pigs in slaughterhouses are alive and conscious as their necks are knifed.

Regardless of what you think of animal rights, these are animal welfare issues. And I've barely scratched the surface. You may disagree with the philosophy or agenda of animal rights organizations, but you are appalled by the suffering of billions of farm animals every year.

Please don't forsake the animals just because you don't like what some of their advocates are saying or thinking. Help us help the animals who are suffering RIGHT NOW — we can discuss other issues while we're doing that.

Animal rights groups are about the only organizations really trying to educate the public on the awful conditions of farm animals; on the widespread, routine animal welfare violations — and on how to stop them.

We advocate going vegan. You may want to limit your meat and dairy consumption to "humane" farms. Good luck. Every humane farm I've seen still has substantial animal welfare problems. Just go with veggie chicken and be done with it. No need to kid yourself or spend energy convincing yourself that "the animals are really treated nicely" (including during transport to the slaughterhouse and slaughtering itself).

Read "Even If You Like Meat". Read articles such as these from the Humane Society of the United States, which stop well short of recommending veganism. Tell friends and families about the harsh realities — the confinement and deprivation — of factory farms. Email your Senator or Representative to support stronger anti-animal cruelty laws and enforcement.

I'm looking for a coalition. To help the animals now. One more thing — it takes amazingly little time or money to make a huge positive impact in animals' lives.

You want to help people? Great. You can do both. Many animal advocates are in the same boat. Note that helping animals usually helps people. Reducing meat and dairy consumption drastically cuts down on energy consumption and water pollution. The same with switching from fur to faux fur. And the good feeling you get helping our fellow creatures (just look at their eyes when they're allowed to walk outside in an open field or nuzzle for the first time against their mother's fur) will help get you through the day.

Livestock Auctions: Misery for Sale 

Attention, carnivores...

For those of you who don't think too much about where the meat on your plate food came from, you might have some vague notion that there's inhumane treatment along the way: mothers separated from babies, frustrated animals confined in cages, blood and gore in the slaughterhouse.

But transportation is also a horror: long trips in freezing cold or unbearably hot trucks, with no food or water, the animals packed in so tightly that their heads and bodies are uncomfortably pressed against one another.

Did you know that breeder roosters who aren't tall enough are starved because they can't reach the food?

Did you know that turkeys have been genetically altered to be so large that they can't mate? They're basically raped instead.

When you first think about it, egg processing might seem benign, but it's full of death. For example, hens who get their heads caught in the cage bars end up dying that way.

If you haven't looked very closely into how meat, dairy, and eggs are processed, or you think that farms are like petting zoos with happy animals strutting in the yard, let me tell you: the great majority of agricultural animals face a life so cruel that if you were them you would rather be dead. I mean it. The "lucky" ones are the ones that die right after they're born. They're spared a life of misery.

One part of that misery you probably haven't thought about is the livestock auction. Baby animals, motherless, probably scared out of their wits, are manhandled and subject to all manner of punishment, some of it sadistic. This video shows the cruelty that is commonplace and accepted in livestock auctions.

Watch as the men with the prods repeatedly shock the confined cow. Twenty to thirty times they poke her. Imagine what that feels like. The cow has nowhere to go. She screams. She can't escape. She's being tortured.

Later in the video it's the pig's turn. The man shoves the electronic prod in the pig's side over and over, jolting her with electricity. She's in a small pen and can't get away. When she runs away to avoid the pain, the man chases her and jabs her again. It doesn't stop.

This is but a small glimpse of the horrors that are going on as we speak. Are you eating dinner? Are you eating meat? Then you're supporting this. No, you're not a bad person. You're a very good person with a conscience and a heart and that's why you'll be troubled, and investigate vegetarian options. That's how you stop what you just saw.

Here's one more video. It's very disturbing but it may be enough to get you to stop eating pork products, and I'd appreciate it very much if you'd watch it all the way through. Click here to watch video in Windows Media, here to watch it in Real Media.



Related resources (ways out):

GardenBurger Riblets -- Amazingly Tasty

The Move to Meatless

Thought for the Day 

"Bull fights, rodeos and hunting are essentially staged, man-over-beast contests with the deck heavily stacked in man's (let's be honest about gender here!) favor."
--Jim Mason

Sunday, June 05, 2005

Of Ants And Men 

To all the animal rights skeptics who would like to discuss ad infinitum whether ants deserve rights...

Can we discuss that while we jointly take steps to reduce bluntly obvious cruelties? Each week, try a new veggie meat and I promise I'll discuss yet another angle of "where do you draw the line" or "the ant or the child"

No one knows exactly where the boundary is for rights — or really, anything — but we have a good idea that the boundary is beyond cats, dogs, rabbits, cows, pigs, birds, sheep, foxes, and rodents. They know the sweetness of the warm sun, the comfort of a mother's protective wing, the joy of play and discovery, the bliss of sleeping on a soft bed. They appreciate our tender mercies and suffer deeply from our violence and meanness. So let's stop making their lives sun-less, motherless, joyless, hard, and merciless. We've treated them worse then slaves; worse than heinous criminals.

For their sake, let's treat them as humanely as possible. Free them from our onerous bondage. Let chickens and turkeys revert to their God-given shape, so they can once again fly and mate. Let foxes run and mink swim. Let pigs be the smart, curious creatures they'd like very much to be. The animals, though we've tortured untold numbers of them, will not seek revenge but will simply live their lives in their own way, frequently inspire us, and perhaps through the grace of God, often welcome our friendship.

As for ants — do the best you can for now. How's that? See how wide you can cast your net of compassion. Even the tiniest creature can benefit from acts of kindness. Isn't that what dominion is all about?

Secretary Rumsfeld, There's No Defense for Bullfights 

Except for the disquieting image of Donald Rumsfeld running in the nude,I thought this letter from PETA president Ingrid Newkirk to the Secretary of Defense was very well done:

May 18, 2005
Letter to Donald H. Rumsfeld
May 12, 2005

The Honorable Donald H. Rumsfeld
Secretary of Defense
1000 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301-1000

1 page via fax: 703-695-1219

Dear Secretary Rumsfeld:

You have said that you weren't aware of the abuses at Abu Ghraib, but I don't want you to be caught in the same position over the torture of another group of individuals who, while different from the average American citizen in many ways, still bleed, feel pain, and experience fear just as we do. Because people can change over the years, I would like to get the story straight from you, rather than relying on old newspaper accounts of what you said about this shameful matter when you were NATO ambassador.

Will you please tell me whether your views on bullfighting have changed since you personally "ran with the bulls" in Pamplona? I believe that you can safely say that like most, you had no idea until now that before reaching the streets in Pamplona, the bulls are debilitated with laxatives, blinded with Vaseline smeared into their eyes, and agitated with firecrackers and whips to make them stampede. You probably didn't realize that the bulls who crash onto the cobblestones, bruising and breaking their horns and limbs, are the very same animals tortured to death in the arena that night, having their ears cut off by a matador (literally "killer") while they are still conscious.

I'm happy to note that bullfighting is a dying business. It has now been banned in several Spanish cities. I hope that you will add your voice to this sign of progress and awareness that all torture is wrong.

I invite you to tip the scales back a bit by coming to Spain to participate in the Running of the Nudes— also called the Human Race—an alternative to the cruel spectacle that occurs three days later.

We all live and learn, and we often become more caring as we age. PETA would be pleased to welcome you to run with representatives from Spain and from around the world, wearing as much or as little as you like.

I look forward to hearing back from you.

Very truly yours,

Ingrid E. Newkirk
President, PETA


Ms. Newkirk's blog is http://www.ingridnewkirk.com.

Thought for the Day 

When you're vegan in a non-vegan society or when you're an advocate of animal rights in a society that thinks only humans should have rights, you have to balance two essential principles as you make your journey through life. One: have faith in your convictions, and in your sense of right and wrong; speak from the heart and resist going along with the majority or straying from your ideals out of convenience. Two: remain humble; listen to and respect others; audit yourself; consider that each of us is imperfect, each of us is going to get things wrong, each of us will stumble, and each of us can improve.

Pet Wasteland 

In Petland, a nationwide "pet shop" chain, our best friends are reduced to merchandise; inventory; business assets and liabilities. The care provided to dogs, cats, rabbits, birds, and rodents is minimal--it's a business cost. The animals come from "mills" where animals are litter-production machines that live in filthy small cages and get zero human kindness. There is no reason for these horrid places to exist in civilized society. Don't these animals deserve better? Can't we do better?

The following article, republished by permission, is from www.petstorecruelty.org. It has three parts:
Note Petland's repeated violations of extremely basic animal welfare laws, as well as the lax enforcement of those laws. Often it is animal activists who alert authorities to these types of problems and spend considerable time and effort making sure that they are remedied.

Emphases are mine.

PUPPY MILLS

Think about how you felt physically and emotionally the last time you were limited to a small area for only a few hours--taking the SATs, a long car ride, flying on an airplane, sitting through a day-long conference. Antsy? Claustrophobic? Like you would scream if you had to sit there for another day? Now think about having that sensation FOR YOUR ENTIRE LIFE. That is the horrible fate of breeding dogs confined to small cages virtually from birth till death in thousands of commercial breeding facilities, commonly known as puppy mills.

A puppy mill is a facility, large or small, that breeds dogs for profit. These facilities are notorious for ignoring the dogs' physical and emotional needs. The dogs go crazy from boredom, and their bodies waste away. Dogs are usually prized for their boundless enthusiasm and zest for life, but in puppy mills, they receive no compassion, and their spirits are broken. They live and die in pain and misery.

How do you tell if a pet store gets puppies from puppy mills? First of all, pet stores that have a large selection of purebred puppies (say, 20 to 30) year-round are almost guaranteed to be getting dogs from this type of facility, since otherwise they would not be assured of a constant supply.

Second, people who care about puppies look for good homes for them. They do not ship them off to be sold in pet stores.

A third indication that a pet store's puppies are mass-produced in puppy mills is if pet store employees are reluctant to tell you the name of the breeder or where the breeder's facility is located. They may say they get puppies from "private breeders." Puppy mills ARE private breeders. Our local Petland has cited a "strict privacy policy" regarding its breeders. On registration papers provided to customers, it has in several cases, and most likely in many other cases, failed to provide any information about the dog's breeder.

In Virginia, THIS IS ILLEGAL! Section 3.1-796.78 states that pet dealers who sell dogs with registration papers--such as AKC papers--must provide the NAME and ADDRESS of its breeders. Most likely, Petland fears that customers who see Missouri, Kansas, and other Midwestern addresses will think "puppy mills," since the Midwest is "Puppy Mill Central" in the United States. If you or anyone you know purchased a puppy at the Fairfax Petland and received papers that do not contain the breeder's name and address, PLEASE contact us at all4theanimals@yahoo.com.

In the case of Petland, there is clear evidence that Petland has obtained puppies from puppy mills. During an April 2000 Dateline NBC exposé of puppy mills and pet stores, investigators visited two of Petland's "private breeders." One facility housed over 500 dogs; the other, 200 dogs, all in cages. During their investigation at the first breeder, Dateline investigators never saw the dogs let out of the cages, but they did find dogs with neurotic behavior caused by long confinement. They saw filth on and around the dogs, maggot-infested food, timid dogs housed together with aggressive dogs, untreated wounds, broken bones, mange, open sores, and rotted teeth--conditions causing the dogs tremendous pain and long-term suffering.

A former truck driver for the second Petland breeder told Dateline of how her boss ordered her to throw live puppies into a trash burner because they were sick. A sickly puppy purchased at a Petland store was traced to a third facility housing over 200 dogs. That puppy had expensive health problems including hip dysplasia and chronic diarrhea. This is not surprising, as puppy mills are also known for breeding animals with genetic defects as well as breeding dogs as often as possible, causing the mother to wear out and die young after producing many litters of sickly puppies.

After the story aired, generating a huge response from the public, Petland refused to be interviewed by Dateline. Petland merely sent a letter claiming the story was "unfair" and apparently did not pledge to change its operations in any way. If you would like to borrow a copy of the Dateline video, contact us at all4theanimals@yahoo.com.

Petland openly states on its website that it obtains many dogs from USDA-licensed breeders, as if this ensures a certain level of quality and humane care. Is that the case? The USDA requires that anyone with 3 or more breeding dogs who sells animals to pet stores be licensed. It has minimal requirements regarding food, water, sanitation, and space, but enforcement of the USDA's regulations is extremely lax. For example, the USDA requires that the commercial breeders have an exercise plan for the dogs, but they do not make sure that the plan is ever carried out. If more than one dog is housed in a cage, the dogs are not required to ever be let out at all. The USDA's head veterinarian, Ron de Haven, admits that only about half of the roughly 4,000 USDA-licensed facilities even meet USDA's minimum regulations, a disgraceful example of the USDA's failure to enforce existing animal-protection laws.

De Haven attributes this failure to the USDA not having enough inspectors, but even when the inspectors find problems, fining and closing down puppy mills is very rare. The USDA's mission is to support agriculture, and apparently it considers puppy mill owners to be "dog farmers" worthy of its protection. Bottom line: if you buy a puppy from Petland or other pet stores, it's very likely that his or her parents are enduring a lifetime of cruelty.

Petland's puppies also usually come with some kind of registration papers, such as AKC (American Kennel Club). Many people are under the false impression that this means the parent dogs are in good health. As the AKC will tell you itself, that is not true. The papers only mean that the two parent dogs were of the same breed, and the AKC takes the breeder's word that that is the case. (The sickly Petland puppy featured in the Dateline story turned out not even to be a purebred.) Parent dogs can be toothless, lame, undernourished, have serious genetic defects, and still have their litters of puppies registered with the AKC.

Haphazard breeding can result in both physical and behavioral problems. For example, one woman we met had purchased a puppy from the Burke Pet Center, which like Petland obtains puppies from the Hunte Corporation. Although she has successfully housetrained many dogs, she has never been able to fully housetrain this one.

IN-STORE CONDITIONS

Petland's broker (middleman between breeders and pet stores), the Hunte Corporation, is based in Missouri, often considered the puppy mill capital of the country due to its large concentration of puppy mills. Other states with many puppy mills include Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania (especially Lancaster County).

After collecting puppies from many Midwestern breeding facilities, weeding out the sickliest ones to suffer an uncertain fate--most likely death--the Hunte Corporation packs caged puppies into its trucks and drives them to Petlands and other pet stores all over the country, usually a stressful trip of several hundred miles. At the store, having spent their whole life of 8 weeks in cages, the puppies again spend most of their time in small cages.

According to veterinarians, the confinement of large numbers of animals to a small store, with new animals being added all the time, is an invitation to rampant infectious disease. The neatly stacked rows of cages at Petland resemble isolation chambers--ideal for driving people and animals crazy, but not a proper environment for animals adapted to life on this planet through millions of years of evolution. The barren cages do not allow the puppy to experience the outdoors, where a normally developing puppy would be able to see the sky, feel the sun and wind, and run and play with human and canine companions in the dirt and grass and leaves. Small cages do not provide a rich indoor environment for the puppies to explore. Rarely do the puppies ever have a soft surface to lie on, although even in the wild, animals seek out soft nesting spots. All Petland puppies have is a mesh-floored cage (uncomfortable for their feet), maybe a single chew toy, and, if they're lucky, a hard floor tile, about 1 foot by 1 foot, that is supposed to serve as their bed. The sad faces of the puppies entice well-meaning visitors into "rescuing" puppies by buying them, even for the outrageous prices of well over $1,000 per puppy that Petland usually charges (the adoption fee for dogs at our local shelter is $85). Of course, each time they sell a puppy, Petland orders more from the Hunte Corp.--approximately 25 puppies each week for one Petland store.

Since Petland's cages are standardized, one might assume that they are in compliance with all state anti-cruelty laws as well as laws that prohibit the sale of certain species, but this is not necessarily the case. The Petland in Fairfax, Virginia, was found to be in violation of the Virginia state law that prohibits pet stores from housing puppies in cages in which their feet could fall through the mesh. This went on for many months, even though it was obvious to any observer that the tiny puppies, such as Chihuahuas and Toy Rat Terriers, could only hobble painfully around their cages, their legs falling through the mesh each time they tried to move.

The Fairfax Petland also failed to consistently provide a solid resting platform until ordered to do so by Animal Control. When it did, it used one or two hard floor tiles that were still not completely solid. Some of the larger puppies, such as the Golden Retrievers, could only fit their two front legs on the tiles, not their whole body, as required by law. Recently, when a citizen reported the absence of ANY resting platforms in the cages, Petland admitted to police that it removes the platforms each night because they make a mess. This is against the law.

Petland was also selling one or more tarantulas, even though tarantulas are prohibited as pets in our county.

Puppies are by no means the only animals suffering in Petland stores. Petland also sells kittens, rabbits, parakeets, parrots, chinchillas, ferrets, hamsters, fish, and a variety of other animals. Because even fewer laws protect these animals, they most likely come from breeding and warehousing facilities even worse than puppy mills. These animals are also housed in cramped cages or aquariums at the store and are sold with a minimum of instruction on how to properly care for them. This can lead to premature death, abandonment, and for long-lived species such as parrots, many years of suffering in an inadequate environment.

People who take jobs at Petland because they love animals sooner or later find out, as one told us, "It's all about time and money." This employee saw a lot of deaths among the small animals at the Fairfax City store, particularly birds and hamsters, and saw that many of the puppies arrived with respiratory problems. The puppies also had sores from lying on the hard mesh cage floors. Another Fairfax City Petland employee tried to nurture the puppies and was told something along the lines of (not a direct quote), "They don't need petting; they're just money. If you want to do that, go to the shelter." An employee from another Petland told us that puppies are taken from their mothers at 5 weeks old and go through so much stress and handling that Petland recommends that once the puppy arrives at the store, he or she be left alone for 48 hours. Our local Petland puts puppies on display immediately, and they are available for sale about 24 hours later.

One customer of the Fairfax Petland unknowingly purchased a dog with hereditary defect that makes simple anesthesia a grave risk to the dog's life, so that any situation requiring anesthesia, even spaying or neutering, can be fatal. Another puppy purchased at the Fairfax Petland developed a cough within a couple of days. Because it was the weekend, the dog had to be taken to an emergency clinic, voiding the Petland warranty, which requires that the dog be brought to a particular vet who works with Petland. Neighbors have seen the huge truck that arrives with its weekly delivery and heard the cries of the puppies as they are unloaded.

Several local vets who have treated puppies purchased at the Fairfax Petland have stated that the many of the puppies are sick. One said, "I HATE Petland!" Another said of a Petland puppy, "This puppy is a walking time bomb." A local trainer working with Petland puppies found many of them unsocialized, extremely difficult to train, and mentally and emotionally ill.

If you purchased a sick puppy at the Fairfax Petland, please contact us at all4theanimals@yahoo.com. We are not going to give out names of vets, former employees, and other people who give us information about Petland unless specifically given permission. But we will encourage people to ask their vets about the health of pet-store puppies, and they will be able to confirm what these experts are saying.

HOMELESS ANIMAL CRISIS

All this abuse is made worse by the fact that it is completely unnecessary. Petland sells animals for one reason only--profit--in flagrant disregard for the homeless animal crisis not only in our local area but the entire country. In 2003, in Virginia alone, over 60,000 dogs and 73,000 cats were killed in animal shelters. Nationwide, year after year, a minimum of 3 million dogs and 4 million cats are killed in U.S. animal shelters due to lack of homes. For dogs alone, that's 6 killed every minute, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. It's estimated that a quarter of the dogs killed in shelters are purebreds. If you have trouble visualizing this tragedy because of the huge numbers of animals involved, please go to www.pleaserescueme.com/gone.cfm to see just a few of the innocent animals who have been killed simply for lack of homes.

The vast majority of the animals killed in shelters are healthy, friendly, and young. The 7 million dead does not even include the animals being killed outside shelters (for example, Greyhounds bred for racing and slaughtered when their racing days are over). While our local shelters and rescue groups struggle valiantly to rescue homeless animals, spending their energy and money to save innocent lives, Petland's contribution is to pump mass-produced animals into our community, as well as similar communities all over the country.

Because the number of small animals killed due to homelessness is not even counted at shelters, many people are unaware that there is a homeless animal crisis among small animals, too. Our local rescue groups cannot even begin to save all the rabbits, birds, ferrets, iguanas, and many other small animals that desperately need homes.

Please do not buy ANY animal at a pet store, but please do contact local shelters and rescue groups (both purebred and mixed breed groups) if you can provide an animal with a good home.

Three of the many salient points in this article:
More on the last point:

The problem is not the number of purebred animals given up to shelters — the figure that breeders like to focus on — but the number of animals sold by breeders to people who might otherwise adopt a shelter animal.

It would be a mistake to presume that everyone who buys an animal from a breeder would categorically rule out an animal from a shelter. Pet stores and breeders work to attract buyers, through advertisements, cat shows, web sites, special edition magazines that highlight purebreds, and of course kittens and puppies in the window. Potential adopters who do not have their heart set on buying an animal from a breeder or pet store may be swayed by any of these marketing tactics, but would have been just as happy with a shelter animal. This is what I see repeatedly from my volunteering at a shelter. Shelter animals of course have just as much personality and love as any animal from a breeder. At the shelter, the adult animals' personalities are more established and predictable, there is enormous variety in terms of age and temperament, and — best of all — the adopter is saving a life.

Even if we assume very conservatively that only 20 percent of the families that buy an animal from a breeder are the "swing group" that could go either way, we're still talking millions — enough to empty the cages of shelters and rescue groups across the country.

Most "responsible" breeders claim that they don't do it for the money, but for the love of the animals. Many do it more as a hobby than a source of income. To these breeders I have a respectful but urgent request: Stop — at least until we clear almost all those shelter cages. If you love animals, please help the homeless animals languishing in cages find a home. Temporarily redirect your customers to the nearest animal shelter. Tell them that the shelter Siamese will be just as talkative and lively as the one from a breeder, and that the shelter Siamese is in a more desperate situation: her long-time owners abandoned her when they moved. Please let your customers know that the mixed breeds, the ones that never show up in breed books, purr, wag their tails, scrunch their noses, and kiss you just as delightfully as any pedigree animals, and that they would make a perfect addition to a family.

Here is a letter that says what I just said, only much more eloquently:

A letter to dog breeders

Friday, June 03, 2005

Animal Rights: Animal Welfare with Teeth 

At its best, "animal welfare" means respecting and providing for the needs of animals.

But the phrase has been misappropriated by animal exploiters to mean "respecting and providing for the needs of animals' when it's convenient or doesn't cut into profits."

Often it means less than that: empty words thrown into a mission statement or press release for PR purposes. Ringling kidnaps baby elephants from their families, beats them, and locks them in chains, and proudly proclaims its commitment to "animal welfare." Animal research lobbyists claim that animal welfare is a priority as they vigorously fight all attempts to provide birds and rodents — the vast majority of research animals — minimal protections under the Animal Welfare Act. Factory farms disingenuously advertise their dedication to animal welfare while systematically stripping animals of all welfare: denying them everything that makes their lives livable, and willfully torturing them during transport and slaughter.

The logical endpoint of animal welfare is animal rights, which recognizes that animals' core needs are as fundamental to them as our core needs are to us, and are thus worthy of similar protections.

Animals and humans don't need to have the exact same set of rights, just as adults and children don't have the exact same set of rights. But there is an overlap. Animals suffer and fear suffering similarly to us, and thus are deserving of the right not to be physically or psychologically tortured by us.

Animal rights is what makes animal welfare "stick." It recognizes that certain acts, such as beating an animal to make it perform a trick, are reprehensible and unacceptable — always. It recognizes that the consequences of such actions are dire enough to merit legal protection to the victim. It is an antidote to moral relativism; it recognizes right and wrong and holds us accountable for our behavior.

Thursday, June 02, 2005

"It Happens In Nature" - Part 1 

On an anti-animal rights forum I asked whether it was cruel to grow chickens so large that they collapse and starve to death because they cannot get back up. One answer I got was that it's not cruel because "it happens in nature."

Notwithstanding the fact that the genetically-misshapen bodies of these chickens are grossly unnatural...

Fire happens in nature. Does that morally justify arson?

Wednesday, June 01, 2005

Thought for the Day 

"Zoos think it's their God-given right to have an elephant, but elephants are not doing well in captivity. There are so many ailments they can get, and their surroundings are different. They walk less. They are overweight. They get foot problems. It's not unusual for an elephant to die in captivity, and, even after an autopsy, we don't know why."
--Alan Roocoft, retired senior elephant keeper at the San Diego Zoo

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?