Essays and Musings on Animals and Society

Monday, January 31, 2005

Thought for the Day 

"I ask people why they have deer heads on their walls. They always say because it's such a beautiful animal. Well, I think my mother is attractive, but I just keep photographs of her." -- Ellen DeGeneres

Sunday, January 30, 2005

Run, Fox 

Run, fox
Gallop across the snow

Don't let them put you in a cage
Estrange you from Mother Earth
Dissolve your desires
Pervert your spirit
Burn your insides

Run, fox
Through the trees
  Catch your prey
    Feed your young
      Sleep in your shelter
      Under a billion stars

Don't let them trap you
Crush your paws
So your wails pierce the night
Your whimpers dull the morning
Your blood reddens the snow
A gun-butt rams your skull
Boots suffocate your lungs
You gasp hoarsely as two new orphans look on in terror

Run, fox
Sun on radiant auburn
Nose sniffing
  Torso gliding
    Tail like a beacon
Powerful legs push and propel you
Disappear in the brilliant silent afternoon

Gallop across the snow
Run, fox

Dinner This Week: Spaghetti and Non-MeatBalls 

Do you live near a Trader Joe's? They're all over the East Coast. They have a million locations in California. In between, they're in places like Reno, Santa Fe, Ann Arbor, and Indianapolis. They make great fake meatballs. They taste just like meatballs. Pop them in the microwave for a few minutes and they're ready.

Make a semi-gourmet meal cheaply and with practically no work. Buy some fancy pasta like farfalle or spinach linguini. Add your favorite bottled spaghetti sauce. (But pass on the Prego — I'll explain later.) Cook the pasta as usual. Heat the sauce and the "meatballs," separately. Voila, you're done. Enjoy!

Serve with a green salad and garlic bread. Want to fancy up the salad with almost zero effort? Add some spinach leaves, endive, and Clementine orange slices. Top with a sesame or balsamic vinegar dressing.

If you don't feel like the same old garlic bread, try this. Lightly toast the bread. Spread olive oil and minced garlic on top. Sprinkle some oregano and just a few hot pepper flakes on top. Put back in the toaster until golden brown. Delicious.

If you have non-vegetarians in the house, they'll never know the meatballs are vegan. If you don't live near a Trader Joes, there are several other brands of non-meatballs; you'll find them in the frozen or refrigerated section of the store. Sometimes there's a "health food" section just for vegetarian meat alternatives. Don't you feel special?

Dessert? Fill a goblet with fresh strawberries. Add a splash of Irish Mist or Cointreau. (Not too much, you have to work the next day.) Garnish with a sprig of fresh mint. This takes three minutes. Simple but elegant.

Total time for this mid-week masterpiece: 30 minutes. Added feature: not too many dishes. And did I mention it's super-healthy?

Monday, January 24, 2005

Be Back Next Tuesday 

AnimalWritings is taking a long-awaited vacation, seeing the family and doing a little "R & R." Not sure if it will be possible to post during that time. In the meantime, here are some of the posts (actually, the only posts) that have generated some interest in the last several months:

Greta's Short Life

The First Time Out of the Cage

Cooper: A Responsible Rooster

Lamb of God

My "Dialog" with Macy's

Dear Wildlife Rescue League:

The Haunted Room

Don't Hurt Animals and Pretend Jesus Would Approve

To My Friends in the Military, or Who are Veterans

A Turkey Named Adam

Benediction

Those were all serious. This one's lighter:

If I Was the Conductor of a Chicken Orchestra

The family is renting a condo at an undisclosed location, so we'll all have plenty of time to catch up. Hint to animal advocates: try to change the world, not your family.

Sunday, January 23, 2005

Fur Trim Poster 


9 out of 10 cage-raised foxes...




...are killed for fur trim.



"Why Do You Care About Animals... 

when there is so much human suffering?"

For the same reason I care about human suffering.

I want to reduce suffering. Many species of animals appear to suffer in the same way as humans. So it's like asking "why care about babies when there are so many adults suffering?"

I also want to point out that when this "objection" question is posed, it is usually framed as "animals" vs. "humans suffering." Not "animals suffering" vs. "humans suffering" or "humans vs. animals suffering."

When people raise these challenges, it is because they dread confronting the awful truth: they are responsible for the animals suffering. Anything to avoid reaching that inevitable conclusion.

As animal advocates, our goal is not to win arguments or put challengers in their place. It is to assure people that it's okay to care about animals, and that they have the enormous power — and therefore the obligation — to ease that suffering, and that it is stunningly easy to do so, and that doing so helps rather than hinders their ability to help fellow humans.

So many complicating questions, yet one simple answer: be kind.

Saturday, January 22, 2005

Civil Rights and Animal Rights 

There is a direct and inescapable connection between the civil rights struggle and our current struggle to free billions upon billions of animals from bondage, torture, deprivation, isolation, and inhumane execution at any age including newborn. Supporters of both movements have been branded as troublemakers, threats, or foolish utopians. Those with a vested interest in the status quo, afraid to relinquish some of their power, have channeled their fear into an attack on the advocates who dared to tell the bitter, incriminating truths.

Police used cattle prods on civil rights protestors; ranchers use cattle prods on animals too sick too walk, who deserve mercy instead of punishment. The government lied about syphilis experiments on black men in the 1940s; today they lie about AIDS experiments on monkeys and torture "experiments" on many species. Sanctimonious politicians who fraternized with KKK members warned that civil rights leaders were a threat to democracy. Today, there are bills in state legislatures and the U.S. House Of Representatives to make non-violent protest against corporate animal cruelty a terrorist crime under the guise of "Homeland Security." Slaves were bred for physical traits. Today, genetic engineering results in grotesquely proportioned animals that suffer from chronic pain and heart disease but generate higher profits because they have more "meat." Slaves were sold in the market like property; their very sentience all but denied. Today, specially-bred laboratory dogs are marketed to medical research labs; the mild temperament of the dogs makes them more compliant when "researchers" break their legs. Protestors who point out that we can engage in commerce and conduct medical research without the pervasive cruelty are dismissed as sentimental obstructionists. Plantation owners claimed that slaves were well-cared for. Agribusiness conglomerates claim that farm animals like being in tiny ware cages. Racist businessmen claimed that slavery was necessary to grow the economy. Medical researchers claim that separating infant animals from their mothers is necessary to treat juvenile delinquency. These denial-crazed notions are infinitely more sentimental than the tugging of one's heart in response to seeing an assailant club a defenseless being into submission — or death.)

The parallels between civil rights and animal rights are endless. An entire class of living beings subjugated to the whims and fancies of those that, through force and intimidation, cling to power. Civil rights advocates and animal rights advocates are making America more American, less exclusionary, less tyrannical.

The vested interests in animal exploitation will do everything possible to divide supporters of civil rights, gay rights, and animal rights; to play one off the other. They will claim that ending animal experiments will impede AIDS research (the opposite is true); they will claim, with feigned indignance, that any comparison between minority rights and animal rights is demeaning to people of color, in hopes of creating a chasm between the two groups. Meanwhile, they market the unhealthiest, fat-laden foods in African-American neighborhoods, and squander money on rodent experiments that could otherwise subsidize prenatal care for every pregnant teen in the country. They will play the race card, the gay card, the fear card, the patriotism card, the God card, whatever it takes to fight off the non-violent army that only carries one weapon: the truth. They fear a unified front against exploitation because it will crumble their fortress of lies. United we stand to free all victims of cruelty and indifference. All slavery, anywhere, of any type, is wrong. We must oppose it.

Friday, January 21, 2005

Poems for Rabbits and Cats 

Rabbit Interior Designers

Design skills are very important
To any self-respecting rabbit.
Why live inside a plain old pen
When you can turn it into something elaborate?

Now this concept might sound strange,
Maybe even funny.
But you'd take the subject quite seriously
That is, if you were a bunny!

First you'd change the floor plan.
I believe it was Sigmund Freud
Who said you can better express yourself
Inside a trapezoid!

Next you'd move the litter pan
From the south side to the north.
No special reason needed;
"Bunny's prerogative" and so forth.

For interest you'd add a paper bag
With entrances front and rear;
The ulterior motive being, of course,
To make it disappear!

You'd highly regard your water bowl -
Fine stoneware, sturdy and stable.
All the more fun to tip it over
and turn it into a table.

"I'd like some new toys - ASAP!"
That's the point you'd get across
As you threw out your current supply of playthings
With one determined and decisive toss!

Knowing that a well-balanced living space
Needs maximum Feng Shui, (*)
You'd increase your Chi by randomly spreading
Large amounts of hay.

By far the best part of any abode,
Whether you're a Dwarf or a Rex or a Lop
Is a comfy fleece mat, placed right where you want it -
A tired rabbit needs to flop!

So remember this lesson, and remember it well --
If you ever come back as a rabbit:
Your number one job is to thoroughly change
The place that you inhabit!

(*Pronounce like "fung shway")



My Favorite Part of My Cat
(A poem for ages ten-and-a-half through eleven-and-three-quarters)

What part of my cat do I like best?

The eyes, of course. Blue. Haunting. Mesmerizing. Enchanting. Like a lake with a sapphire surface. The water is warm and oceanic and enveloping and deep. The eyes are flecked with gold and hues and the sun and stars.

But that tail! It speaks and lashes and slashes and curls and says "Mr. Watson, come here I want you." It twitches before a pounce. It arches forward to say "Hi." It's a barometer: straight up means fair weather, half-mast means trouble brewing. It has a vocabulary of a thousand words and I only know a hundred of them. At rest, it is a tail of two kitties. One is peacefully sleeping, the other is wrapped around, nurturing, protective.

But it must be the nose! Velveteen. Precocious. Demure. Investigative. Sometimes lightly snoring. When God had an idea to add something cute to the world, He added a kitty nose and said to Himself, "stop right there, that's perfect." Brush, brush, brush the nose. Kitty closes his eyes and breathes.

Those ears! Two detectives. Buddies, thinking independently, acting as a team. Danger! Food! Playtime! The front door! Food! Food? An army of two. Alert! Stand down. Like Yoda when a noise happens off to the side. Ears back — ready to attack. Ears forward — on duty at the window. Ears at rest — two punctuation marks. Just like a five year-old's picture: little circle, big circle, curly-cue, and those two exquisite pointy ears.

The claws! When my cat steps up to his cardboard scratching pad, his paws dig and stomp. And he's like a little buffalo, and shreds of cardboard are flying everywhere, and I say "good boy," and he scratches more vigorously, and it's loud, and it's a big, fun mess. And his claws are like fine silver cutlery. When he kneads, he lets the claws come out just a little. He bunches up the bedspread, then lets go. He does this over and over. It's more calming then waves on the beach.

I almost forgot the purr! It puts me into a deep sleep. It soothes me. It heals my bones and makes me well when I am ill. Cats are small furry nursemaids — they come up and purr for animals and people to help them feel better. It's a wonderful mystery. Scientists are trying to solve that mystery. Why?

They're all my favorite parts because they're all part of my cat. He's a good cat, and he just gave me a big head-bump to remind me.

Thursday, January 20, 2005

Altruism and Empathy in Animals, Part 3 

I found the following description, of one animal painstakingly helping another reach her destination, to be a poignant illustration of dignity and tenderness in animals. This glimpse of animal altruism is from The Pig Who Sang to the Moon: The Emotional World of Farm Animals, by Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson, and the comments that immediately precede and follow it are from a review of the book by Karen Davis of United Poultry Concerns.

"[Masson] invites us to listen to...a gander trying desperately to help his mate with a broken wing limp over a vast plain to their southern wintering grounds:

She had set foot on the long journey to the Falkland Islands by foot. He would not leave her, so after flying for a few hundred yards, he would alight and wait for her to catch up. He would fly ahead, to show her the way, then return, again and again, calling to her with his wildest and most piercing cries, urging her to spread her wings and fly with him to their distant home.
Having gotten to know chickens and turkeys and ducks and studied the faces of factory-farmed animals in footage and photos over the past twenty years, I see in this image of the desperate gander and his struggling mate a symbol of the agony in the birds and mammals we've imprisoned "in situations where they cannot express the emotions they inherently possess" apart from desperation, fear, loneliness, degradation and defeat. Farmed animals carry within themselves an imprint of their "distant homes."

Perhaps we can be one tenth as kind as the gander and become vegetarians.

Wednesday, January 19, 2005

Dear President Bush: 

I am dismayed that animal cruelty will part of the inagural celebration.

I know you are very fond of your pets and would never harm them. Please keep that in mind as I respectfully request that you reconsider your decision to have a beaver fur hat commssioned for the inauguration ceremony. Beavers suffer prolonged agony when they are trapped. Underwater videos show them holding their breath as long as possible — up to 20 minutes — as they struggle to free themselves.

Beavers are family-oriented, hard working, and smart. I'm proud that they're one of America's native species. They have emotions and a capacity for pain similar to Ernie's and Miss Beazley's. When a family member is lost, the survivors grieve. (This phenomenon is seen in many species.) The Bible tells us that "a righteous man is good to his beast." Being good does not include inflicting an early and painful death. Let the beavers live and enjoy their lives as God designed them to do: swimming, caring for their young, building sturdy dams, taking pride in their homes, families, and handiwork. They deserve better then to be an ornament.

You can set a wonderful, humane example by commisioning a handcrafted work made from synthetic materials; perhaps it could honor the industrious and skillful beaver who will be allowed to live another day thanks to your grace.

Tuesday, January 18, 2005

Thought for the Day 

"The fate of farmed animals since World War Two has been to be locked up."
-- Karen Davis, founder and president of United Poultry Concerns

United Poultry Concerns (UPC) is the world's leading education and advocacy group for chickens and other domestic fowl. Ten billion chickens a year (in the U.S. alone) endure the worst suffering imaginable in factory farms — without any protection from animal cruelty laws. The best way to help chickens is to stop eating them. Check out the wealth of recipes and ready-made products that give you the taste of chicken without killing or cruelly confining them. The same goes for turkey. Make Karen Davis' day: let her know you're "giving it up" for your feathered friends.

Monday, January 17, 2005

Black and White Moments 

Maybe you have had these "black and white" moments. For me, the one that stands out most is being at a party about ten years ago. We were talking about the Washington Redskins and about how quarterback Doug Williams led the team to the Super Bowl. A woman blurted out, "He was nothing but a lucky nigger." Gaping silence followed. I'll get back to this in a minute.

Throughout my life up to that point, although in steadily decreasing frequency, I had been in situations where someone in the group of all whites would say a disparaging remark or blatantly racist joke about blacks. As far back as I can remember, I have been insulted and astounded that someone who knew me (or thought they knew me) would presume that I would accept the remark, much less find it funny if humor was intended.

I'd like to think that the two adjacent moments at that party — when the racist remark was made, and when everyone in the room reacted in stunned silence — were part of a watershed. The other people there were not a bunch of liberals. Most of them were southern, Cajun, and conservative. They came from a legacy of racism. Silence is not always the most elegant response, but it will do. Afterward, I thought, maybe we've reached the point where, at least the vast majority of the time, people can no longer presume that racist comments will be accepted.

A little about me. About the time I heard that remark, I was in my second period of being the only white person in a black band. For the second time in my life I regularly was the sole white in a sea of several hundred people. I recommend that everyone try to be a minority at some point in their life. You won't know what it's like. Don't fool yourself. You'll only have a split-second glimpse. But it's something.

Most musicians will tell you that a band is the closest, most emotionally vulnerable relationship you'll ever have outside of those you live with. It's raw and exposed. There are moments of jubilation and of unrestrained anger. You will criticize someone's heartfelt baring of their soul and they will criticize yours. You will develop a sixth sense, knowing the precise moment that the drummer will randomly strike the symbol without looking.

If I wasn't devoted to writing about animal rights, I would write essays about my perceptions during those two periods. They would be supremely unscientific and subjective; devoid of scholarship. They would be about how I think a lifetime of being treated as second-class, inferior, dangerous, threatening, and unambitious affects your behavior, goals, self-image, and image you present to the world. The writings would be based on my experiences riding home in a van late at night after a gig; talking about wives and girlfriends; making up nicknames for each other; standing on the front porch, looking at a desolate neighborhood with no trees and sirens blaring all night long; shopping for tuxedos in the worst part of town; playing half-court; feeling stupid and awkward but eventually confident and accepted; commiserating when we got fired; being giddy and elated together after we surprised ourselves with how well we could play.

I'm no enlightened white boy who claims to know what it's like to be black. No way. But I've learned this. Treat everyone, and every creature, with the utmost kindness and respect. They will not just thrive. They will amaze you. Do that and you will have a good life.

(Thank you for your wisdom and inspiration, Dr. King.)

Martin Luther King: "I Have a Dream" 

Later this week, I will comment on how this speech and the work of Dr. Martin Luther King relates to animal rights. Today, I turn the post over to the following masterpiece:
.............

I am happy to join with you today in what will go down in history as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation.

Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity.

But one hundred years later, the Negro still is not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languishing in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land. So we have come here today to dramatize a shameful condition.

In a sense we have come to our nation's capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check, a check which has come back marked "insufficient funds." But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. So we have come to cash this check -- a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice. We have also come to this hallowed spot to remind America of the fierce urgency of now. This is no time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism. Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time to lift our nation from the quick sands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. Now is the time to make justice a reality for all of God's children.

It would be fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment. This sweltering summer of the Negro's legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality. Nineteen sixty-three is not an end, but a beginning. Those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam and will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual. There will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights. The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges.

But there is something that I must say to my people who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice. In the process of gaining our rightful place we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred.

We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force. The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny and their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom. We cannot walk alone.

As we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall march ahead. We cannot turn back. There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, "When will you be satisfied?" We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality. We can never be satisfied, as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities. We can never be satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New York believes he has nothing for which to vote. No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.

I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells. Some of you have come from areas where your quest for freedom left you battered by the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality. You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the faith that unearned suffering is redemptive.

Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed. Let us not wallow in the valley of despair.

I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.

I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal."

I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.

I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice.

I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.

I have a dream today.

I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of interposition and nullification; one day right there in Alabama, little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers.

I have a dream today.

I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together.

This is our hope. This is the faith that I go back to the South with. With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.

This will be the day when all of God's children will be able to sing with a new meaning, "My country, 'tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing. Land where my fathers died, land of the pilgrim's pride, from every mountainside, let freedom ring."

And if America is to be a great nation this must become true. So let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania!

Let freedom ring from the snowcapped Rockies of Colorado!

Let freedom ring from the curvaceous slopes of California!

But not only that; let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia!

Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee!

Let freedom ring from every hill and molehill of Mississippi. From every mountainside, let freedom ring.

And when this happens, When we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, "Free at last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!"

.............

Sunday, January 16, 2005

Role Reversal 

My friends -- black, white, and every color in the rainbow -- you each have tremendous power to shape the world. Will we be oppressors or liberators? Will we treat those weaker than us as we would want to be treated by those stronger than us? Will we enable the animals with souls like ours to enjoy the world God has made, or will we engage in hand-me-down slavery, subduing our winged and hooved brothers and sisters so we can adorn ourselves with trinkets and dine on the flesh of their backs that we broke? Are we now the plantation owners? Or the emancipators?

Let freedom ring for all creatures. Let the mighty waters of righteousness cleanse us of hate and wash away the barriers that blind us to the suffering we cause.

Saturday, January 15, 2005

Expanding Circles of Freedom 

When I look at animals held captive by circuses, I think of slavery. Animals in circuses represent the domination and oppression we have fought against for so long. They wear the same chains and shackles."
-- Dick Gregory

"Before animals are skinned and made into fur coats or trim, they suffer incredible—and needless—cruelty."
-- Persia White

"Cruelty is cruelty, whether it’s cruelty to children, to the elderly, to dogs and cats, or to chickens, animals who are at least as intelligent as dogs or cats and are interesting individuals in their own right."
-- Russell Simmons (founder of Def Jam Records)

"While I am hardly one to complain about a young African American making an honest living, I urge you to ask yourself just how honorable it is to preside over the abuse and suffering of animals."
-- Richard Pryor, in a letter to Ringling Brothers ringmaster Jonathan Lee Iverson

"Vegetarians are leaner than meat-eaters, so being a vegetarian is not only good for animals, it's good for your girth, too!"
-- Traci Bingham

"America’s meat addiction is responsible for immense animal suffering as well as poor human health. It's time for people to lighten up on animals and lighten themselves up, too."
-- Elizabeth Muto (Miss Black USA)

"The animals of the world exist for their own reasons. They were not made for humans any more than black people were made for whites or women for men."
-- Alice Walker

The noblest form of gratitude for one's freedom is to share it with all who desire it.



Additional Resources:

Black Vegetarians

African American Networking Group of the Vegetarian Society of the District of Columbia

Acts of God and Man 

Two recent news items got me to thinking about natural and human-made disasters. The first was an editorial cartoon that showed a plane on its way to deliver goods to tsunami victims. On the ground below were the empty outstretched hands of the Sudanese. The caption, coming from inside the plane, was, "don't look down." The second item was a story on NPR pointing out that in some countries damaged by the tsunami, deaths each year from unclean water exceed deaths from the tsunami.

I mention this not to deemphasize the tsunami tragedy. It is overwhelming. Yet there are so many tragedies, keeping track of them all is numbing. It seems impossible to give adequate attention, much less financial assistance, to the billion people starving throughout the world. Then there are the multiple billions of animals suffering, most of them in tiny cages or confined spaces. There is one big difference with this disaster, however: we're the primary cause of it.

It's amazing. The real cost of ending animal cruelty is practically nothing. Just stop doing it. All the money solicited by animal rights groups is for combating problems we insist on perpetuating. If we treated animals with respect, as intrinsically valuable beings with vital interests, instead of as things, the animal rights groups could disband. And we would be healthier and live in a much more peaceful and just world.

It's just amazing how easy and inexpensive the solution is, yet how paralyzed we are by inertia. Perhaps the toughest answers to accept are the ones right in front of our faces. They're too convenient; we have no excuse to not act on them immediately.

Fur Industry Lies: Part 1 

"Fur farmers have cultivated strains of mink and fox that are genetically distinct from their wild cousins and which are accustomed to ranch conditions." -- The Fur Institute of Canada

First of all it's a death factory, not a ranch. Secondly, the claim is stupefying in its idiocy. Open the cage doors, see how much your inmates love your "ranch."

Mink are semi-aquatic animals that would normally spend half their life in the water. They go insane in their 10 inch by 24 inch wire cage. No animal can adapt to such extreme confinement.

Prove your claim. Let the mink choose for themselves whether to stay or leave. They will flee in a heartbeat and never return. Even the most crippled mink, suffering from heat stress, crazy with boredom, weak from no exercise, afflicted with "screw neck" syndrome, deafness, and other inbreeding-induced diseases, will drag themselves out their wire prisons to feel Mother Earth; to taste freedom.

It takes 30 to 60 mink to make a fur coat. Each coat is the dead reminder of living Hells, in which the animals' misery was non-stop. There is nothing remotely "glamorous" about torturing animals for their skin. It would be a felony were it not for legal loopholes — those will go away some day.

Friday, January 14, 2005

"Worthless" 

Overheard: a Catholic churchgoer remarking that animals used in medical experiments and product testing wouldn't be "good" for anything else.

It makes me sad that people would give so little value to an animal's most urgent needs: comfort, freedom, companionship.

I'm dumbstruck that people would say such thoughtless things and read from the Good Book every Sunday. Where is our mercy? Without it, what are we "good" for?


"And God made the beasts of the earth according to their kinds and the cattle according to their kinds, and everything that creeps upon the ground according to its kind. And God saw that it was good."

Wednesday, January 12, 2005

Thought for the Day 

"Their very weakness and inability to protest demands that man should refrain from torturing animals for the mere possibility of obtaining some knowledge.

 --Luther Burbank

Rabbit burned in medical research "experiment"

Thought for the Day 

"I am not interested to know whether vivisection produces results that are profitable to the human race or doesn't. The pain which it inflicts upon unconsenting animals is the basis of my enmity toward it, and it is to me sufficient justification of the enmity without looking further."

Mark Twain

Cruel Lies 

The animal experimentation industry's defense that animal research is necessary to cure human disease is coming apart at the seams. Animal tests can't predict which substances cause or cure cancer in humans. Test tubes do a better job at predicting toxicity. Contrived strokes in animals result in treatments that fail miserably in humans. After 15 years of wasting millions of dollars we can conclude that monkeys don't get AIDS. Pharmaceutical executives admit that they test drugs on animals because of legal requirements and liability protection, not science. Medical schools discovered that surgeons are just as qualified without animal labs. We're cataloguing how every gene works in humans and coming up with solutions targeted to an individual's genetic profile. The inherently sloppy method of extrapolating from rats to humans grows more archaic each day.

Now the animal experimentation industry is trying a different tactic — a new low in shameless manipulation. The Foundation for Biomedical Research (FBR), an animal research industry lobbying group, is starting a PR campaign around the theme that animal experiments are good for animals. They want you to support more animal experiments on behalf of your cat and dog.

A little about FBR. They helped kill the 2002 expansion of the Animal Welfare Act that would give minimal protections to mice, rats, and birds — 95% of all laboratory animals — even though the measure passed both houses of Congress and was supported by a majority of Americans including those that work in animal labs. The founders of FBR once hired a shady provocateur to goad an animal rights activist into bombing a building. Please note: they were willing to put humans at risk and break the law in order to score PR points. FBR regularly makes claims about animal experiments that flagrantly contradict available evidence. I'll cover some of the more outrageous ones in the next few months. It's bad enough to treat animals as disposable objects; it's even worse to lie about it.

For the vivisection industy's most extreme faction to pretend that they are interested in animal welfare is nauseating. They fight animal welfare. They destroy animal welfare. They burn and beat and drown and blind and shock animal welfare. They kill animals and fabricate shameful, heinous lies about their bloody business. Their poor psuedoscience steals money from more rigorous and promising science that holds the promise for cures, that studies the real disease instead of a facsimile, that uses consenting volunteers instead of animal slaves. The FBR is a foundation for cutting up animals, breaking their bones, starving them, emotionally torturing them, gouging out their eyes, eviscerating them, piercing their eardrums, pouring corrosives in their eyes, and inflicting every conceivable pain and abuse on them day after day. With your money. And lying about it — pathologically. Exercises that are so contrived they invite ridicule — FBR claims that they save your life, and now your pet's life if you didn't fall for the first lie. Animal experiments have not added one day to our lifespan or our pets' lifespan but have killed billions of animals. Every one of them suffered first.

FBR, how dare you put cats in barren cages, fill them with diseases that they don't naturally acquire, and have the audacity to tell me you're doing it to help my cat. Which cat is the lucky one that gets tortured?

Even if your experiments, which we both know supposedly are done for human benefit, helped my cat, I would REFUSE. Just like I would refuse to boil ten babies if it cured cancer. And your animal experiments have not cured cancer. I reject your Trojan horse. Your rat experiments can't predict outcome in a mouse. The National Cancer Institute gave up on using animals to test carcinogens. Animal experiments were worse than useless on fen-fen and Vioxx and Rezulin and hormone replacement and Flosint and Zelmid and Eraldin and Opren and Zomax and Linomide and a thousand other medications. Animal experiments couldn't even prove that smoking was harmful! Sometimes the same treatment produces totally opposite results in humans and animals. Research on how human genes affect disease is held up because you are giving cocaine to 5000 rats — again, like you did last year. They add no useful information, but use up funds while drug rehab clinics close. The Draize test and LD-50 tests are crude and excessively cruel; for a decade in vitro tests have proven to be superior: cheaper, faster, more reliable, and FBR knows this but lobbies for more animals to die slow deaths by poison. In fact it doesn't matter if alternatives exist; if a test isn't predictive, it's worthless and should be dropped. The EPA is using our taxes to give known toxins to animals. No complaint from FBR — more money. Tell the public the tests will save the planet. Claim that you're concerned about animal welfare. (Further posts this week will highlight that "concern" in detail.)

You drive animals insane with the psychological "experiments" to which you are addicted; meanwhile the mentally ill are out in the street. Or are they? One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, hoping for a different result. You've shocked helpless animals for a century now.

My cat has contributed to research that may help other cats. When he had pancreatitis, he gave an extra blood sample so veterinarians could study his unusual hormone levels. He's better now, but he wants you to help him by freeing the cats from their joyless cages in research labs. Improve their lives by letting them be companion animals. He wants you to free the mice and rats, too. None of his wild cousins that eat rodents for a living treat them as cruelly as you do.

Work on a cure for your heartlessness. Invest your money in the animal shelter instead of instruments of torture. Quit lying.

Monday, January 10, 2005

Humans Aren't the Only Species that Can be Tortured 

The Justice Department has broadened the definition of torture to include mental suffering and non-severe physical pain. The first sentence of the new ruling states: "Torture is abhorrent both to American laws and values, and to international norms."

Amen. Now we just need to convince the Justice Department that 10 billion animals are tortured every year in factory farms, research labs, and cruel "entertainment" venues. Could you live your entire life with your arms at your sides? That's what it's like for battery cage hens. Their notebook-sized living space doesn't even give them enough room to flap their wings. Their beaks are cut off so they can't clean their feathers. Their most basic instincts are denied; their life is one of total deprivation and constant, severe, confinement. Torture.

Cage-raised foxes, killed for the cruel fur industry, literally climb the walls as a result of their tiny enclosures, which allow them no activity other than pacing back and forth. These intelligent, normally active creatures become so starved for activity, they hurt themselves and kill their cagemate. Torture.

Rabbits bred for meat or fur never hop. Circus elephants are whipped and their legs put into shackles. Dogs in puppy mills don't take walks and play fetch; they live in hutches before being shipped to Petland. Dolphins are kidnapped from their close-knit families and taken to marine parks, where their habitat shrinks by 99 percent and their freedom shrinks 100 percent. Declawed bears and tigers are put in cages so tourists can take their picture next to them. Torture.

What about the veal calf? Imagine waking up day after day in your own urine, weak from lack of exercise, a heavy chain around your neck, penned in so you can't turn around. Bad enough if you're an adult. Suppose you were two years old. Veal calves are literally dragged from their mother shortly after being born and taken into solitary confinement. Torture.

Speaking of mothers, here's a question for mothers: How would you feel if your newborn was shocked every time she tried to approach you? Suppose the shocks got steadily worse, causing her to scream? Mother cats in research labs become so distraught that they have to fight every instinct in their body; these brave cats shoo their kittens away to prevent them further pain. The cats are smart enough to figure it out, but imagine the anguish. Your tax dollars have been paying for this for several decades. State-sponsored torture.

There's little doubt that animals have intelligence and emotions. In cages and pens and slaughterhouses in every state, animals are treated worse than the most heinous criminals and they experience fear and dread, and loneliness and despondency like we would if we were subject to their horrid conditions.

The mental and emotional suffering of the animals held captive by the food, fur, entertainment, and medical research industries far surpasses the minimum requirement for torture.

But if we cannot convince the Justice Department that animals are being emotionally tortured — which they are — the physical punishment is bad enough. Farm animals are de-horned, de-beaked, de-tailed, de-toothed, and de-toed without painkillers. Animals meant to live on solid ground live on wire grating. Sick animals get no medical care. Lambs freeze in the barn. Downers that can't walk are poked and prodded as they try to get up and slip again. Captive bulls get a 5000-volt prod stuck in their midsection repeatedly so they'll jump high as soon as they're released from the chute. Australian sheep travel for months on a ship, then get their throats slit while fully conscious. Rabbits in product testing labs can't wipe the drain cleaner from their eyes; their paws are locked in a restraining device. Chickens? Think of a physical cruelty. They've received it.

Caged-fur animals are electrocuted. Trapped ones die slowly in instruments of torture. Like the snare trap: "A wire loop encircles the animal's body (leg, abdomen, neck, etc.). As the animal struggles, the loop tightens...and tightens." The trap strangles the animal to death. (See this page.)

There is virtually no argument about animals' capacity to feel pain. They fear it, they scream, they writhe in agony. Why aren't they covered by anti-torture laws? The laws are in place to prevent suffering — the animals suffer at our hands. Why does it matter which species is suffering?

In our short history, it has been legal to torture Indians. You could abuse your wife without fear of reprimand. Lynching? Law enforcement looked the other way. Slavery was 200 years of legalized torture against blacks. At one time, suggesting that any these victims be granted rights and protection against mistreatment would have invited scorn — or worse. That's where animals are today. I will keep fighting for their rights for many reasons, but most importantly because they share a poignant and primeval bond with us — we both suffer. We know what it's like; we are compelled by reason, compassion, and everything that's right not to inflict that on others if we can help it. No, God did not put them here for our use. He put us here to walk side by side with the animals and all of Creation into the kingdom of heaven. Mercy not exploitation. Friends not slaves. Companions, not throaways. Protected, not targets. Intelligent design and evolved magnificence, not soulless commodities. Help me fight for the animals — PEACEFULLY and with dignity —and eventually even the doubters will yield and encompass our "radical" views as their own, as they did with human minorities that were once property but are now senators, CEOs, and heroes with national holidays.

Sunday, January 09, 2005

Dear Universoul Circus: 

Cedric Walker
President
Universoul Circus
510 Whitehall Street
Suite A
Atlanta, GA 30303

Dear Mr. Walker:

Congratulations on being the first African-American-owned circus. But please leave the elephants out of it.

Elephants have basic needs that are violated in the circus. Elephant families are complex, tight-knit, and long-lasting. They are typically headed by two dominant females. Young elephants stay with their mothers well into their teens, and remain closely bonded for life. Elephants require room to exercise and roam freely.

In the artificial and often harsh circus environment, elephants are denied these necessities and turned into subservient caricatures of themselves. They are permanently removed from their social groups. Under threat of punishment, they are forced to perform unnatural acts in front of large, noisy crowds. They travel long distances in uncomfortable, confining trailers. They may have to perform when sick or tired.

The vast majority of elephant trainers use rods with sharp metal hooks to break the elephants' will; the rods are most "effective" on the elephants' knees and toes. There is reliable evidence, including USDA citations, that UniverSoul and its partners engage in this form of abuse.

Taking beautiful, intelligent children away from their families, beating them into submission, coercing them into servitude – sound familiar? No elephant joins the circus willingly, but periodically they try to break away from their masters. They're telling us something. Please don't enslave these majestic animals. Let them have their freedom.

Then I'll be glad to come to your shows.

"But for the use of physical punishment by their oppressors, animals would never be part of a circus."  -- Richard Pryor

Saturday, January 08, 2005

Canada's Shame 

The victims, the baby Harp Seals huddled on the ice, are small and harmless, and can't swim. They are utterly defenseless against the clubs, hooks, and ice picks that pierce their flesh and bring a torturous, painful, bloody end to their 12-day existence.

I've watched videos of the massacre on a large screen and had to turn my head. No one with half a heart could witness this suffering and not be sickened by it. The hunters' ruthlessness is horrifying. They pound the seals until the animals are covered in blood, moaning, gasping for breath, struggling to get away but unable to move.

John Efford is Canada's Minister for Natural Resources. He vigorously defends the seal hunts and asserts that revulsion to this mass killing of innocents is "sentimental."

I have no problem with being labeled "sentimental." My dictionary defines "sentimental" as "influenced by tender feelings." Guilty as charged. But condemning the ruthless slaughter of defenseless seals is about as sentimental as condemning a beheading. In both cases, the assailants are terrorists, blind to their own bloodlust, contemptuous of the rest of the world, which detests their brutality.

Matthew Scully, author of "Dominion: The Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals, and the Call to Mercy" and former speechwriter for George W. Bush, has written a powerful editorial entitled "Canada's Cowardly Face," in the National Post, a Canadian Newspaper. Mr. Scully masterfully conveys the ugly orgy of abuse, self-deception, and pathetic defenses of the seal "hunt" by its vested interests. If you've been putting off reading about the Canadian seal hunt, or haven't had time to learn what the fuss is about, I recommend Mr. Scully's piece as an introduction. If it enrages you, good - because that may compel you to write Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin and urge him to have mercy on these poor creatures. Let him know that you won't spend one penny on his country until he puts an end to this senseless bloodbath. Or you could just pray. For the souls of the baby seals whose short lives end with a merciless beating. One can only hope that the victims are quickly delivered to the kingdom of heaven, where they'll have an eternity to recover from the wounds they received on a deeply fallen earth.

Below is an excerpt from Mr. Skully's editorial. The full piece is here.

In six weeks' time they would learn to fend for themselves. Instead, the men move in, welcoming the newborns into the world with clubs, hakapiks and hooks. With all the manhood -- and less skill -- that it would take to execute tens of thousands of frantic puppies or kittens, they go by boat and snowmobile from nursery to nursery. British and Canadian veterinarians, observing the scene in recent years, estimated that about 40% of victims are skinned alive. Uncounted others are 'struck and lost,' meaning shot and drowned.

Those who followed last year's hunt, which brought death to some 350,000 pups, will remember such typical scenes as one seal trying to escape as another is clubbed nearby; the creature makes it to water's edge but, too young to even swim, must wait there as the man with the club approaches. Other footage -- seen across the world, however unfairly, as the face of Canada -- showed sealers routinely dragging conscious pups across the ice with boat hooks, or shooting the seals and leaving them to suffer.

Yet standing there, ankle deep in gore and innocent blood, the sealers just can't understand why anyone would object. And we're all supposed to feel sorry for them, these fine, upstanding fellows so unappreciated by the modern world. Mr. Efford, back when he led Newfoundland's fisheries department, demonstrated the mindset when he proposed to ban all cameras from the scene of the hunts -- as if the problem were public knowledge of the event, rather than the event itself.

Prime Minister Martin's address is:

Right Honorable Paul Martin
Office of the Prime Minister
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
K1A OA2

You may also want to sign the Million Signatures for a Million Seals petition, which will be sent to the Canadian House of Commons. The petition is the work of the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)

To learn more about the seal hunt, visit the Humane Society of the United State's Protect the Seals section of their web site. They have several excellent articles on how the so-called hunt is conducted, the lies and stonewalling of the government, and how you can help the animals. IFAW is a leader in documenting and educating the public about the cruelty of the seal hunt. They maintain a comprehensive library of articles about the seal hunt online. The information in these articles is informative but distressing. However, there is strength in numbers. Speak out. Take action. Get involved. The only way to ensure that the bloodbath continues is to do nothing.

There is one more thing you may want to do. Bookmark Mr. Scully's column, as well as links to online videos that show the brutality of the seal hunt. Give these to anyone who criticizes animal rights advocates as being too "extreme" or "violent."

Links:

Matthew Scully's anti-seal hunt editorial

Seal hunt videos from IFAW

HSUS video: "Animals in Distress"

Friday, January 07, 2005

Dear Miss Beazley: 

I heard you found a home with the First Family and are living at the White House. Congratulations! I wasn't so lucky. I got killed at the shelter last night. They just ran out of room. There weren't enough cages for all the animals, so they had to put some to sleep.

I came to the shelter about a year ago. I had been living with a bunch of other dogs outside. Our "family" didn't spend much time with us. They came out to fill up the food bowls once a day. Sometimes they chained us to the fence. All we could do was bark. It got hot in the summer, because we couldn't all fit under the one scrawny tree. Often the water bowl was empty by afternoon.

When the people moved, they left us to fend for ourselves. Fortunately someone called the Humane Society. The people there were nice. But most of the visitors wanted puppies. It's hard to adopt out an older dog. Plus I was never real comfortable with strangers because I wasn't used to them being nice to me. A few times I thought I was going to get a real home. Someone would fill out an application for me, but always another dog got chosen.

During my last year, even though I never got a home, at least I was comfortable. The shelter volunteers took me for a walk in the courtyard each day. They were nice, but I sure thought about a home a lot. I wished I could be in someone's living room, next to their chair. The family would come over to pet me, and maybe throw me a toy. I'd fetch it and bring it back to them. I'd get lots of pets all day long. Maybe my family would have other dogs I could play with, and maybe two kittens who would run around and amuse me, then snuggle up next to me to nap.

Do you have a nice yard? I bet that's great. I think you'll have a lot of fun in your new home.

I heard you're a pedigree. I don't know who my parents were.

Well, if you get a chance, see if you can get your humans to come down to the shelter and visit. Who knows, they might fall in love with a dog there. A dog like me. A mixed-breed adult, a little shy, looking for someone to love him.

Good luck. I have to go now. I see one of my old friends from a few cages over just arrived.

Doctors Increasingly Suspect of Animal Tests 

In response to the question, "Does it concern you that animal data can be misleading when applied to humans," 82% of physicians answered "yes."

The research was conducted by the polling firm Taylor Nelson and commissioned by Europeans for Medical Advancement.

Doctors have good reason to be concerned about extrapolating data from non-humans to humans. For instance, tests on monkeys predicted that a woman's risk of heart attack and stroke would decrease when taking hormone replacement therapy. Instead, it increased. There are thousands more examples like that.

In other cases, animal tests delay lifesaving therapies. Penicillin, beta-blockers, and pacemakers are just three treatments that were held up due to problems that occurred in animals but not humans. Side effects that were serious in animals but not in humans may have shelved tamoxifen, a vitally important anti-breast cancer drug, had the findings been published earlier.

Every medication works on some patients and not on others. Side effects are a bell curve, not uniform across the population. It is difficult enough to predict efficacy and side effects (positive or negative) for any individual from human trials, much less from a homogeneous sample of rats.

Dosing is another challenge on which animal trials shed little light. Different species tolerate different doses. Every medicine is useful at one dose and poison at another. You have to test on the target species, starting at the lowest levels, e.g., genetic, chemical, sub-cellular, and work up to individuals and populations, to determine the precise way that the medication interacts with the host system, and to determine the degree of variability within the species. Extrapolating from animal tests, which are often highly contrived in the first place, is not only dicey but superfluous, since the substance in question is always tested on human cells, tissue, organs, volunteers, and patients. Animal tests are too unreliable to "rule in" any new drug or treatment, and may "rule out" a valuable cure due to species-specific adverse reactions.

Often, one or more genes affect the outcome of a drug in a given patient. Medicine is slowly but steadily moving toward the day when prevention, monitoring, and prescriptions can be customized, depending in part on the patient's genetic profile. Researchers are studying the interrelationships of genes, pathogens, drugs, and disease response in humans. (Keep in mind that a gene typically does not work in isolation but in conjunction with the host. Human genes spliced into a non-human do not necessarily perform the same as when in a human; such an assumption could be deadly.) Scientists using non-animal techniques are cataloguing the structure, function, and properties of genes, proteins, viruses and other disease agents, and drugs. This information, combined with sophisticated monitoring instruments and computer modeling, can be applied directly to human patients. This is the future of medicine. It is being impeded by animal experiments that use up half the research budget.

The system is currently rigged in favor of animal experiments, even though they are less relevant or predictive than human-focused research, and more prone to errors. It is easier to get a grant for a mouse project than for human clinical research, and, for better or worse (probably worse), quantity of published papers is the coin of the realm in the research world.

Until recently, based on polls, public statements, and anecdotes, most physicians implicitly assumed that animal research was necessary. That view is changing, as problems with animal data and superiority of alternatives becomes more apparent.

I've focused on drug testing, but in tests for toxicity, birth defects, and cancer-causing potential, animal data fares poorly, as well. The animal model persists because of inertia, not science. Inertia in academia, government, and the workplace is indeed a powerful force. There is a natural tendency for institutions to resist change. People with a vested interest in "the way things are" try to stay the course. Those that criticize the system are often weeded out. But change does happen, slowly.

In several upcoming posts, I'll discuss shortcomings of animal experiments, proven alternatives that are being squeezed because funds are directed toward the archaic animal lab, and the bright horizon of state-of-the-art research and diagnostic methods, including bioinformatics, the human proteome project, and pharmicogenomics. I'll also reveal some terrible abuses that occur in animal labs and explore why humans in charge of captive animals may treat them so callously.

Thought for the Day 

"One day the world will look upon research upon animals as it now looks upon research on human beings."

-- Leonardo Da Vinci

Torture on a Small Scale 

Imagine you're walking in the woods, minding your own business, enjoying the day. You step in something extremely sticky. No matter how hard you try, you can't lift your foot from the glue-like substance. You yank and pull and tug with no luck. You pull with all your might, until you're exhausted. Nothing. Panic sets in. You're alone and have no way to get help. Your attempts to break free become more violent and unfocused; you strain muscles and fall over and ache and scream. You eventually run out of energy. You notice you've become parched and famished. Night falls and predators come out. You're stuck. You wonder, in a daze, what will happen next.

This is how animals in glue traps start to die. It's slow, painful, and terrifying. The victims desperately try to break free from the adhesive. They die in the trap.

PETsMART uses these hideous devices in their stores. Despite the fact that they promote mice and rats as companion animals, and claim on their web site to "raise awareness of companion animal welfare issues."

PETsMART assured People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) that they would stop using glue traps, but that promise turned out to be empty. CEO Phillip Francis said "We have found glue boards to be an effective form of rodent and pest control and their use to be generally accepted by the public." Mr. Francis' apparent commitment to glue traps ensures an endless cycle of animal suffering, since the traps are ineffective at reducing rodent populations; new mice or rats replace the ones killed in the traps.

Here is my reply to Mr. Francis, and further thoughts on glue traps.

Mr. Francis:

I am compelled to respond to your statements about glue traps, which cause severe trauma in their victims and kill them by starvation and thirst.

"We have found glue boards to be an effective form of rodent and pest control..."

"Control" and "effective" are code words for "lethal" and "killing." Death from glue traps is slow and agonizing; there's little debate on that. Anyone who killed their pet rodent with a glue trap would be considered a monster. If used on a cat or dog, the perpetrator might be charged with a felony and forced to undergo psychological evaluation. Yet mice and rats suffer essentially the same as cats and dogs; they just have less legal protection. You are exploiting this loophole to torture the cousins of the animals you sell as pets.

"...and their use to be generally accepted by the public."

The public is ignorant, not accepting of glue traps. Explain to the public how animals stuck in the glue lose hair and fur, and how they chew off their own limbs to break free. Show the public pictures and videos of the animals struggling. Then ask if they "accept" this method of killing. We both know what the answer would be.

But it really doesn't matter how popular glue traps are. That the CEO of a purportedly animal-oriented company so casually accepts this method of cruelty is reprehensible. Of all places, PETsMART should be using the most humane rodent management techniques possible, not one that is widely known to be excessively cruel. Those of us in the animal rescue community who have lauded your pro-adoption policies are deeply dismayed at your callous attitude toward the suffering of other animals.

The best way to keep rodents out of your house is to block all entrances. In addition, make your house less attractive to animal visitors by storing food and garbage in tightly-sealed containers.

You can buy humane, "live" rodent traps from numerous online sources. Place the traps in areas where you suspect rodent activity. Check them every few hours. If there is an animal in the trap, go to a woodland park or similar venue, and release the trapped animal. Some models of humane traps are set up so that the rodent "eats" his way out of the trap. The rodent won't like being caught and confined, but compared to glue traps, the "catch and release" method is humane and non-violent. It's a little more work, but that's our burden. As God's delegated protectors of Creation, we sometimes have to inconvenience ourselves to spare our less powerful brethren from harm.

Further Thoughts
It's easy to focus on the animals we know best: cats, dogs, elephants, dolphins, chimpanzees, tigers. But the littlest animals, with their squeals and tiny movements, suffer also. Their delicate bodies try to break free from a slow and agonizing death, as they defecate and urinate and rip out fur during their losing battle with cruelty. Mice and rats may be small, but their pain is just as real the captive lion gunned down by a tourist. The mighty suffer with the weak at our hands.

"The greatness of a nation can be measured by how it treats its weakest members." --Mahatma Ghandi. Each of us can be great.

Wednesday, January 05, 2005

Cruelty in a Fish Bowl 

In a PETsMART mailer I saw an ad for a fish "starter set." The picture showed a single fish in a small globe-shaped tank under a light. The tank looked a foot wide at most.

What kind of life would that be for a fish?

A sad and lonely one. Fish need stimulation, variety, companionship, exercise, and room, just like land animals. Fish are intelligent and have individual personalities. They tend gardens, remember complicated routes, and score as well as primates in some tests. Fish are social. They use a wide variety of communications, including friendly touch — like dogs, cats, and rabbits.

Beta fish are exceptions. They must live alone. They were bred to be violent, because people wanted to watch them fight. Entertainment for the heartless.

There's more to fish than meets the eye. But what met my eye this morning as I read the paper was PETsMART selling animal cruelty in a bowl.

Tuesday, January 04, 2005

Thought for the Day 

"Non-violence leads to the highest ethics, which is the goal of all evolution. Until we stop harming all other living beings, we are still savages.

  -- Thomas Alva Edison

Monday, January 03, 2005

Hunting, a Destructive Habit 

In this post, I respond to a few of the more outlandish whoppers in an Arkansas Gazette editorial entitled, "Hunting is about more than meets the eye," by Trey Reid. Mr. Reid speaks glowingly of the "purity of the endeavor" and refers to philosophers who swoon over the "impassioned sport" and "code of ethics" of hunting. None of this impresses the wounded deer, fooled by the hunter's decoys and bait, stumbling off to bleed in the snow.

The entire article can be downloaded here or, if the previous link is too long, by going to the Arkansas Gazette archive search, typing "Hunting Trey Reid" in the search box, and specifying a begin and end date of 12/19/2004. There is a nominal charge.

I do appreciate two aspects of Mr. Reid's article. He admits that hunters like to hunt. I've read too much pro-hunting fluff that tries to repackage what is essentially a leisure activity (in the U.S. and other developed countries) as some sort of civic duty. Mr. Reid, to his credit, also makes no attempt to use the Bible to justify hunting. I incorporate biblical concepts into my arguments against hunting, however; I presume that most hunters reading this are Christian and have an interest in better serving God.

"Hunting isn't killing". No, it's terrorizing. It starts when the animal foraging for food, perhaps already tired from evading predators, is chased. When she's pursued by a pack of dogs. When she runs from a spray of bullets.

"Ultimately, our objective indeed is to kill. But is that all there is to it?" The damage doesn't end with the kill. Animals form close bonds with one another. Rabbits grieve, sometimes to the point of becoming despondent, when a companion disappears. We see this behavior in one species after another. Animals have emotions and cry. Disney, it turns out, was right. Yes, hunting is more than killing.

"...it is an even higher standard that the hunter upholds." Quit glorifying the non-sport of terrifying and killing animals that have no defense against the hunter's weaponry. The highest standard is clearly spelled out in Genesis and by the prophets: harmony between all beings. Love, not bullets. Kindness, not arrows. We eat every herb and seed and the lion (us) lies with the lamb (the animals, which are good and kind and innocent and simple and depend on our merciful stewardship).

"The hunter is governed...by nature itself and eventually the hunter's own decency." If the hunter is governed by decency he will put down the gun. The animal is not a target but a living, breathing being, like the hunter. He has a will to live, he takes enjoyment from life. He avoids suffering and finds pleasure in simple things: eating, exercising, resting, companionship, the warmth of the sun, and the coolness of the water. Let this animal live.

"'I should not like to own the boy whose hair does not lift his hat when he sees his first deer', [conservationist Aldo] Leopold wrote." Leopold's observation that a boy's hair stands on end upon seeing his first deer is correct. Children connect to the deer. They overwhelmingly have a benevolent feeling toward the deer. They recognize the deer's innocence and do not wish to harm him. But the natural bond is severed like this: the father forces the boy to shoot the deer. The boy cries but obeys his father, out of fear of disappointing him and being rejected. The boy's heart is hardened. The cycle of meanness continues.

"Hunting is not a choice, but rather nature's imperative." If you're a cougar. The notion that hunting is not a choice but an imperative for humans is obscene. Humans don't need to hunt, and, nationwide, most of us don't. We don't need to hunt any more than we need to own slaves. Hunting is indeed a choice. The wrong one. As adult humans, we can choose a path of peace or violence. Hunting is the latter. It is the celebration of domination and murder. It is the choice of selfishness over compassion. Of force over reconciliation. Of oppression over respect. God is mercy, He does not condone killing for pleasure.

By all means, enjoy the wonder of nature. Go out on a crisp winter morning and see Creation at work and play. Leave the gun at home. Come in peace. Wish the deer Godspeed as he gallops off to live another day. There's your glory.

I suspect many objections from hunters. Here's one: "What if we eat the animal?" In this respect hunting is a thousand times kinder than the factory farms where we get 95 percent of our meat, dairy, and eggs. But Gardenburger Riblets and Boca Chicken Tenders are a thousand times better than hunting. They taste remarkably like the real thing, and do not reinforce a tormenter-to-victim relationship between humans and animals. I recommend de-emphasizing meat from the diet. It's easier than you think, and your heart will probably welcome the change — in more ways than one.

Finally: love the sinner, hate the sin. My judgment is with the act, not the person. I've known lots of hunters and liked them all. Many have done wondrous deeds and live exemplary lives when not hunting. I have faith that the goodness in their hearts will enable them to kick their destructive habit. Talk about your New Year's resolutions.

Sunday, January 02, 2005

A Brief Synopsis of the Bible 

God lays out the plan, the ideal, that which He wants us to attain, at the very beginning and the very end. Harm nothing. Eat plants. Look after Creation. Base all relationships on selfless love.

The middle — the stage we're still in — is us bumbling, getting it wrong, God putting up with us, forgiving us, gently putting us back on track. Showing us the way, in small steps we can assimilate.

Ah, yes, there is that one part where God conveys to us, in the starkest terms imaginable, the model: self-sacrifice on behalf of the weak, oppressed, and needy. To the detriment of the world and everything in it, we insist on identifying with the receiver, not the giver in that model.

But every now and then, our glorious potential shines. "Me" gives way to "you." Desire surrenders to grace. We become magnificent servants. The image of God is unmasked. The face of God is not in pennies or pies or pictures of planets. It's in putting out birdseed for the sparrows.

Big Bird 

You surprised me. Posing on the birdbath, like a statuette.

Regal, commanding, composed, relaxed.

Mesmerizing.

You were too large for the landscape; the surroundings were too small for you.

In the instant, in my head..."wow." (I was inarticulate and wordless.)

Then you took off.

Your wings were a series of arcs, like time-lapse.

The air compressed and displaced beneath each slow-motion stroke.

You floated against the sky, blue, white, and gray.

You became an outline. Then you were gone.

Come back...

Saturday, January 01, 2005

No New Year's Celebration for Some 

Many of you have already provided much-needed financial assistance to tsunami victims in Asia. As animal advocates, you're well aware that pain felt far away and out of your sight is just as severe as that which happens before your very eyes. The events halfway across the world remind us that we are all connected; when one suffers, we all suffer. I'm in no position to thank you for your generosity — the survivors fighting for their lives are. The rescue workers bringing supplies into coastal towns and remote villages are. But I thank you anyway.

If you can dig into your pockets one more time, you may want to start out the new year with charity. Look around you. You have imported beer in your refrigerator, a DVD player in your family room, several magazine subscriptions in your mail, and flowers in your yard. I'm generalizing, of course; some of you are barely getting by and have none of these things. But nine out of ten of you are surrounded with what would be considered luxuries by most of the world's population. Maybe this week you'll bring your lunch to work instead of buying it. Or put off buying new linens. Or turn the thermostat down a notch. The money you save can go to Asia. Consider it a Karmic investment. If you can afford it. The last thing I want to do is give the hard sell to folks who may already give a far greater share of their time and money to the needy than I do.

Of course, humans are not the only ones suffering as a result of the natural disaster. Displaced animals are starving and dehydrated, and desperately need food and water to survive. In addition, it's almost a certainty that the animals, like the humans, grieve for lost companions and offspring.

There are two organizations I know of that are working alongside other relief agencies to help the non-human victims. Humane Society International (HSI), the international arm of The Humane Society of the United States, is cooperating with local humane societies to deliver the bare necessities to animal victims and their caretakers. You can donate to HSI here.

The Farm Animal Reform Movement (FARM), is accepting donations and distributing them to grassroots organizations in the affected countries. This may very possibly be the most efficient way to get resources to those who need it most. FARM has already-existing relationships with small vegetarian coalitions throughout the world, as part of its Sabina Fund program. To give online, go to https://www.givedirect.org/give/givefrm.asp?Action=GC&CID=483 and select Sabina Fund as the program to support. For more information on the Sabina fund, visit http://www.sabinafund.org.

As I'm sure every reader knows, Oxfam International and a number of other groups are supplying critical aid to people suffering from the disaster. I have a list a few posts down of web sites for many of the organizations that are collecting and distributing resources to that part of the world, but I presume that if you found your way here, you have no problem finding disaster relief web sites. What I'm more concerned about is that everybody's urgent priority today is completely off the radar screen a few weeks from now. It will be months before the region destroyed by the earthquake has some semblance of normalcy, and the need for funds won't go away soon. Actually, I'm not too worried about this particular group; your experience with helping the forgotten non-human members of society should prevent you from neglecting humans in similar predicaments.

ADDENDUM

Here is a much larger list of international and regional organizations that are providing relief for both human and animal tsunami victims.

Interweaved with the list are several poignant dispatches. The founder of the first stray dog feeding program in Phuket was killed. So were other volunteers. Domesticated animals that were chained or caged could not escape the rising waters. This is important to know because the news has highlighted animals' innate ability to sense danger before an earthquake and seek higher ground for protection. This apparently saved many of the wild animals. The companion and farm animals were not that lucky. For them, it may have been particularly traumatic because their instincts told them to move to safety but they couldn't.

The sea was devastating but let's make the flood of help and prayers even bigger.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?