(If so inclined)
Links: Animals
- Virgil Butler: Ex-Slaughterhouse Worker
- Christian Vegetarian Association
- all-creatures.org
- Episcoveg
- United Poultry Concerns
- Eastern Shore Chicken Sanctuary & Education Center
- Compassion Over Killing
- Vegan Outreach
- In Defense of Animals
- No Eggs
- SHARK (Showing Animals Respect and Kindness)
- Committee to Abolish Sport Hunting
- Animals Voice
- Compassionate Cooks
- Viva! USA
- Assoc. of Veterinarians for Animal Rights
- Care for the Wild
- Vegan Poet
- Humane Society of the United States
- Humane Society Legislative Fund
- Vegan Vanguard
- Foie Gras Cruelty
- Monkeying Around with Human Health
- Stop Animal Exploitation Now
- The Truth About Vivisection
- Save the Chimps
- Americans For Medical Advancement
- Circuses.com
- Fur-Free Action
- Mercy For Animals: Fur Farms
- Choose Veg
- Kindness Not Cruelty
- Anti-Fur Society
- Fur-Bearer Defenders
- Coalition to Abolish the FurTrade
- Heal Our Planet Earth (HOPE)
- Vegan School 101 *New Link*
- Best Friends Animal Society
- Alley Cat Allies
- Alley Cat Rescue
- Dogs Deserve Better
- International Aid for Korean Animals
- AnimaNaturalis.com (En Espanol)
- Pet Store Cruelty
- RabbitWise
- Friends of Rabbits
- Metro Ferals (DC area)
- Humane League of Baltimore
Links: People
- Easter Seals
- Birth Defect Research for Children, Inc. (Better than March of Dimes)
- Street Sense (Opportunity for DC's Poor and Homeless)
- Tolerance.org (Southern Poverty Law Center)
Links: Politics and Current Events
Links: Humor
Links: Hard to Categorize
Blogs
- Veg Blog
- Vegan Chai
- Neva Vegan
- All's Well That Ends VEGAN
- Vegan Metal Biker Dad Punk Blog
- SuperWeed
- Super Vegan
- Vegan Momma
- The Joyful Vegan
- Vegan Bits
- Cats and Cows
- Value System: Peak Oil, Gas Prices, Money and The Future
- Invisible Voices
- Peaceful Prairie Animal Sanctuary
- Vegan FAQ
Archives
- 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
- 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004
- 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004
- 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004
- 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004
- 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004
- 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004
- 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004
- 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004
- 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
- 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
- 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
- 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
- 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
- 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
- 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
- 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
- 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
- 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
- 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
- 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
- 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006
- 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
- 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
- 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
- 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006
- 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
- 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
- 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006
- 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
- 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
- 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
- 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
- 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
- 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
- 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007
- 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
- 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
- 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007
- 06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007
- 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007
- 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007
- 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
- 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007
- 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007
- 12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008
- 01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008
- 02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008
- 03/01/2008 - 04/01/2008
- 04/01/2008 - 05/01/2008
- 05/01/2008 - 06/01/2008
- 06/01/2008 - 07/01/2008
- 07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008
- 08/01/2008 - 09/01/2008
- 09/01/2008 - 10/01/2008
- 10/01/2008 - 11/01/2008
- 11/01/2008 - 12/01/2008
Recent Posts
Peace On EarthTo Meat-Eaters: Easy Ways to Reduce Meat Consumpti...
To Meat-Eaters: Easy Ways to Reduce Meat Consumpti...
To Meat-Eaters: Easy Ways to Reduce Meat Consumpti...
To Meat-Eaters: Easy Ways to Reduce Meat Consumpti...
Interruption: Investigation Reveals Major Retailer...
To Meat-Eaters: Easy Ways to Reduce Meat Consumpti...
To Meat-Eaters: Easy Ways to Reduce Meat Consumpti...
Activism Tip: Have Copies of this Christian Vegeta...
The Zen of One Cat Washing
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
Essays and Musings on Animals and Society
Tuesday, January 01, 2008
To Meat-Eaters: Easy Ways to Reduce Meat Consumption While Retaining Your Comfort Foods, Part 7
[Updated 1/5/2008 12:45am]
Tips For Eating More Vegetables, Continued
- Lately, I've seen these "steam in the bag" packages of fresh vegetables you can buy. They're almost the best of both worlds: The flavor of fresh and the convenience of frozen. I say "almost" because there are only a few types of vegetables sold this way. But they're a great option for busy people and non-cooks who want the color and healthfulness of freshly cooked vegetables on their plates.
- If you're going to cook vegetables, there's no getting around peeling and chopping. Not to mention steaming, sauteing, simmering, and so forth. You may as well have some good tools; they'll make cooking that much easier and you'll get better results. You don't need too many of them.
- You need a couple of good knives, for chopping, dicing, slicing, paring, and peeling. You can get by quite well with a good-sized chopping knife and a small paring knife. Don't get the cheapest. You don't have to buy the most expensive, either. Within your budget, try to buy quality. It's a long-term investmentjust like your diet. Do a little research.
- You want a couple of serrated knives, too. One large one for anything bread-like, and a smaller one for slicing tomatoes.
- I recommend two cutting boards. One large one for general vegetable chopping, and one small one for when you only need two teaspoons of diced onion and you don't want to wash something that takes up your entire sink. Tip: If you place the cutting board on top of a damp rag, it won't slip.
- Good quality skillets are indispensable. You want ones that are well-made so they'll last a long time; you want them to cook evenlyno "hot spots;" and the handles must be always comfortable to the touch. You definitely don't need top of the line (that would cost a fortune), but don't get the cheapest eitherthat's a devil's bargain.
Continuing with the big-small pattern...At a minimum, I'd recommend one wide skillet, perhaps 12 inches, for when you're cooking hash browns or stir-fries, and one smaller skillet, perhaps 8 inches, for when you're just frying up a couple of veggie sausages or a single serving of Mexican-spiced corn. The big skillet should be at least a couple inches deep, with sloping sides. Doesn't hurt if the smaller skillet has some depth, too.
True chefs may scoff at this, but I really like using non-stick pans, for convenience. You can also get by with less oil that way. Note that you should never get non-stick pans super-hot (500 degrees Fahrenheit) or they'll give off toxic fumes. For the same reason, you should never use metal spatulas or other tools with non-stick pans. Which leads us to our next item... - Put two hard plastic spatulas on your shopping list, if you don't already have them. Yes, large and small. The large one for flipping pancakes and veggie burgers and the small one for more delicate maneuvers.
Next, some greatly underrated utensils... - I'm amazed at the handiness of tongs. They're great for flipping oven-baked sweet potato fries, separating frozen dumplings that are stuck to one another, serving cooked spinach from the pot or green salad from the communal salad bowl, and a million other things. They don't cost much and you can get by with one pair.
- For my money, a potato masher is the best way to crumble tofu and other soft things, including canned tomatoes. Yes, tofu. It's such a versatile food, you can't afford not to use it. Unless you're allergic to soy. Of course, potato mashers are superb at their more traditional function of mashing potatoes. Personal preference: Don't get one that has a lattice pattern with tiny holes; I find those give me much less control then more open models.
- Don't forget the humble vegetable peeler. I bought mine during the Ford administration and it's still going strong. It's the standard issue kind, where you hold the potato or cucumber in one hand and peel with the other, sort of like a wood carver. But you can buy something more deluxe and sturdy if you want, such as the multi-purpose unit in this picture:

The start of a grand feast or a simple peasant meal - You need something in which to store leftovers. I like durable containers, like those made by Tupperware. I admit itI'm a big Tupperware fan, even though the company is a little cult-like. Their stuff lasts forever and it keeps vegetables and leftovers freshwhich saves you money and enhances your eating enjoyment.
I know it's tempting to store leftovers in the plastic containers that you get from the deli counter, but I advise against it. High-quality containers made for storing food are going to keep the contents fresher for a longer period. Plus, if you happen to drop the flimsy deli containers, the top will come off and you'll have a huge mess on your hands. You could drop a Tupperware container from an airplane and the lid would stay on.
It's also tempting to put the cover on the pot of half-eaten rice or vegetables and stick the whole thing in the fridge. I do it myself sometimes. But it's a far better option to dump the leftovers into a container especially made for leftovers, and clean out the pot right then and there.
I'll probably never completely trust the safety of microwaving foods in plastic containers, but FYI, can buy dual-purpose containers in which you can both store and microwave food. They have a handy chimney-like thing on the lid that you pop open to let steam out when you nuke the contents.
I'd recommend a small set of various sized round and rectangular containers. That way, you'll always have the right container on hand. Even though you're buying plastic, I think overall it's an environmentally responsible choice, because it's a one time purchase that may drastically cut down on waste over the life of the product.
Bonus: You can use the containers for mixing and serving, also; they work very well for both uses.
Certainly you can buy any container to your likingdon't overlook second-hand stores and Freecyclebut come on, a Tupperware party! - Other stuff: Obviously you'll need pots. One big one, maybe 6 quarts, for Super Bowl chili, one small one, maybe 1.5 quarts, for cans of soup, rice, what have you. Of course, with pots and pans and so forth, it's nice to have in-between sizes to round out your collection. But you'll get them over time.
A small wire whisk is worth it; it lets you mix liquid concoctions much more quickly and thoroughly than if you use a fork, but without the trouble of getting using a blender.
Which reminds me, notice I didn't say anything about food processors. Yes, they're all the rage, but I hardly ever use them, because I don't have much counter or cabinet space and I don't feel like hauling the thing down from the upstairs closet, and I find that half the time, I can use a hand mixer or even the venerable potato masher to get the same effect, plus get some exercise at the same time. But if you want a food processor, I support you. It definitely expands the number of things you can make.
I also like the pasta grabber or whatever they call it in this picture:
Pasta grabber
You'll also want some sort of colander to drain pasta. What else? Some measuring cups and measuring spoons. I'm sure I left out some things. Not to worry, there are plenty of books and web sites on the subject. You can always acquire more kitchen equipment down the road, as you need it. My intention here was to set you up with the minimum needed to make your veggie cooking experience pleasant and productive.
Cooking and Preparing Fresh Vegetables
This is sort of a dividing line. Lots of people who rarely or never cookgrad students, workaholics, overtaxed managers, busy singles in small apartments, what have youwill still put together a quick salad (especially since you can basically dump it out of a bag) or pop some frozen vegetables in the microwave. But buying fresh vegetables and cooking them up, orGod forbidchopping them is where they opt out. It seems like too much trouble or too much time or too much learning curve.
It's theoretically possible to have a healthy and reasonably satisfying diet without ever cooking fresh vegetables. You can have raw vegetables in salads and with dips. You can buy frozen vegetables. You can order cooked vegetable dishes at restaurants or pick them up from the deli counter.
But I highly, highly recommend incorporating home-cooked vegetables into your diet even if you never (up till now) cook. Your diet will almost certainly be much more diverse, healthful, and enjoyable. For one thing, only a small percentage of types of vegetables are sold as frozen. And most people can't afford to eat out every night. And even if you can afford it, it gets old after a while. It's nice to eat at home. In fact, eating at home is one of the things that makes the place you live a home.
Next up: A couple more general tips for eating more vegetables of the cooked variety, then a look at super-easy but tasty ways to prepare specific vegetables.
Labels: cooking, vegetables
Comments:
Awesome post - yay vegetables! I'd recommend using stainless steel pans though, not non-stick. Non-stick pans' coating is full of chemicals that over time will make it into your body. The general consensus seems to be that this is not healthy. Also, I find stainless steel pans last longer, clean more easily, and are more attractive, if that matters.
Also, a shout out for the thrift store! Save our mother earth and buy used, not new. You'll save a ton of cash, and landfill space.
Also, a shout out for the thrift store! Save our mother earth and buy used, not new. You'll save a ton of cash, and landfill space.
I hear what you're saying about the benefits of stainless steel pans and the potential dangers of non-stick. But it's a trade-off. If someone who rarely cooks, and who even more rarely cooks vegetables, will increase their veggie intake because of the convenience of non-stick cookware, and accordingly reduce their intake of meat, and makes sure not to scrape the pans with metal utensils, the health benefits may outweigh the risks.
Excellent suggestion on thrift stores. I agree on all counts. Although I might just add that even if people buy new, if it results in them eating more vegetables and buying fewer frozen meals, there's probably still a net gain to the earth. Especially if they buy good-quality equipment that makes cooking easier and more enjoyable (thus inspiring more homemade meals), and is durable enough to possibly last a lifetime - or longer.
But I hear you. I encourage people to re-use as much possible, as well as to donate unwanted goods to thrift stores so someone else can re-use them.
Excellent suggestion on thrift stores. I agree on all counts. Although I might just add that even if people buy new, if it results in them eating more vegetables and buying fewer frozen meals, there's probably still a net gain to the earth. Especially if they buy good-quality equipment that makes cooking easier and more enjoyable (thus inspiring more homemade meals), and is durable enough to possibly last a lifetime - or longer.
But I hear you. I encourage people to re-use as much possible, as well as to donate unwanted goods to thrift stores so someone else can re-use them.
So when are you hosting the Tupperware party? I look forward to eating all the vegan goodies you'll prepare. ;>)
I also say non-stick pans are a no-no. Like you mentioned, they can give off toxic fumes, which are particularly dangerous for companion birds, and they chip and rust quickly. I never noticed any big convenience advantage over stainless steel, personally, and have had to toss all the non-stick because of peeling/rusting issues.
I also say non-stick pans are a no-no. Like you mentioned, they can give off toxic fumes, which are particularly dangerous for companion birds, and they chip and rust quickly. I never noticed any big convenience advantage over stainless steel, personally, and have had to toss all the non-stick because of peeling/rusting issues.
I have a feeling I'm going to lose this argument by a landslide, which is fine, but...The newer and higher quality non-stick pans are very chip-resistant and should last many years. Personally, I love never having anything stick, even if I make a mistake like putting in too little oil or letting things cook a litle too long. Easy to clean, too. I think both of these features appeal to novices and the cooking-averse.
I'm trying to get non-cooks to cook, and I think non-stick pans will help ease the transition; I'm trying to make it as easy as possible. And I think the health benefits of cooking fresh veggies geatly outweigh the miniscule risk from the non-stick material.
But maybe I'm wrong, and people who by nature never feel like cooking don't care about non-stickiness. If that's the case, I'm happy to be wrong. Though my experience with people who don't cook a whole lot tells me that they love non-stick pans for the convenience.
Anyway, I appreciate the back-and-forth. It's good that readers get these diverse viewpoints and can make an informed decision when they buy or otherwise acquire cooking equipment.
You're right about companion birds, and I should have mentioned something about that.
NOTE: If you live with companion birds, non-stick pans are completely off-limits: the fumes are toxic to birds.
I'm trying to get non-cooks to cook, and I think non-stick pans will help ease the transition; I'm trying to make it as easy as possible. And I think the health benefits of cooking fresh veggies geatly outweigh the miniscule risk from the non-stick material.
But maybe I'm wrong, and people who by nature never feel like cooking don't care about non-stickiness. If that's the case, I'm happy to be wrong. Though my experience with people who don't cook a whole lot tells me that they love non-stick pans for the convenience.
Anyway, I appreciate the back-and-forth. It's good that readers get these diverse viewpoints and can make an informed decision when they buy or otherwise acquire cooking equipment.
You're right about companion birds, and I should have mentioned something about that.
NOTE: If you live with companion birds, non-stick pans are completely off-limits: the fumes are toxic to birds.
Oh - the Tupperware party. I don't sell it, I just use it. But if you really want a Tupperware party, I'm sure I can arrange a Tupperware person to come over. Hey, the host gets a free gift!
Yes, you MUST host a Tupperware party. It is just too funny an idea to not do it! I think you may even get more than a free gift, as at some of these home parties, you get lots of free things based on a percentage of sales.
Back to the non-stick: Of course you are wrong. :>) I can understand wanting to offer reluctant cooks convenience, but I'm not sure the benefits outweigh the negatives on this. Although it's been a while since I've looked into it, I remember reading the process to make non-stick surfaces is very polluting. And although it's not the exact same substance, some study showed that pretty much all humans have traces of Scotchguard in their bloodstreams now. In any event, this stuff is nasty, so convenience or not, it just ain't worth it.
Back to the non-stick: Of course you are wrong. :>) I can understand wanting to offer reluctant cooks convenience, but I'm not sure the benefits outweigh the negatives on this. Although it's been a while since I've looked into it, I remember reading the process to make non-stick surfaces is very polluting. And although it's not the exact same substance, some study showed that pretty much all humans have traces of Scotchguard in their bloodstreams now. In any event, this stuff is nasty, so convenience or not, it just ain't worth it.
I actually am thinking of a Tupperware party. More on that offline.
Back to the non-stick controversy...
If non-stick gets people to eat more veggies and cook at home rather than buy carry-out and pre-fab meals, they'll probably reduce their pollution contribution by a far greater amount than that produced in the manufacture of the two skillets they buy - at most - once a decade.
I think the health benefits will win by a landslide, also. We have trace amounts of a million things in our body, and we also get electromagnetic radiation from cellphones, but we know that people in this country, in droves, get cancer and heart disease from lack of vegetables and too much meat.
Yes, ideally people should avoid non-stick pans, buy organic and locally-grown vegetables whenever possible, avoid buying soymilk from Silk since it's a major dairy subsidiary, and avoid nearly all veggie meat substitutes since they're high in salt.
But my target audience is people whose meals during the week are Lean Cuisine, KFC, Chinese takeout, and the cooked half chicken at the Safeway deli. My goal is to get folks to break that cycle and introduce more fruit, vegetables, whole grains, and legumes into their diets. I want to make the barriers to doing that as low as possible. I don't tell people they must buy non-stick. If someone prefers stainless steel or cast iron, that's great. I support that choice 100 percent. Whatever gets you to put the vegetables in the pan and start sauteeing. But I'd be remiss if I did not mention what I have found to be the significant convenience of non-stick pans.
If some folks change from never cooking to occasionally cooking, they're not going to use the pans enough to matter re: health risks. If other folks take a shine to cooking and become whizzes in the kitchen, they'll probably refine, upgrade, and expand their repertoire of kitchen tools. So the problem is almost self-limiting and self-correcting.
All the other refinements - those will come later. Right now my goal is to get people eating and cooking veggies and other plant-based foods by any reasonable means necessary. I'm perfectly comfortable mentioning the convenience (and lower fat) advantages of non-stick cokware. You might say that's my story and sticking with it. ;)
Back to the non-stick controversy...
If non-stick gets people to eat more veggies and cook at home rather than buy carry-out and pre-fab meals, they'll probably reduce their pollution contribution by a far greater amount than that produced in the manufacture of the two skillets they buy - at most - once a decade.
I think the health benefits will win by a landslide, also. We have trace amounts of a million things in our body, and we also get electromagnetic radiation from cellphones, but we know that people in this country, in droves, get cancer and heart disease from lack of vegetables and too much meat.
Yes, ideally people should avoid non-stick pans, buy organic and locally-grown vegetables whenever possible, avoid buying soymilk from Silk since it's a major dairy subsidiary, and avoid nearly all veggie meat substitutes since they're high in salt.
But my target audience is people whose meals during the week are Lean Cuisine, KFC, Chinese takeout, and the cooked half chicken at the Safeway deli. My goal is to get folks to break that cycle and introduce more fruit, vegetables, whole grains, and legumes into their diets. I want to make the barriers to doing that as low as possible. I don't tell people they must buy non-stick. If someone prefers stainless steel or cast iron, that's great. I support that choice 100 percent. Whatever gets you to put the vegetables in the pan and start sauteeing. But I'd be remiss if I did not mention what I have found to be the significant convenience of non-stick pans.
If some folks change from never cooking to occasionally cooking, they're not going to use the pans enough to matter re: health risks. If other folks take a shine to cooking and become whizzes in the kitchen, they'll probably refine, upgrade, and expand their repertoire of kitchen tools. So the problem is almost self-limiting and self-correcting.
All the other refinements - those will come later. Right now my goal is to get people eating and cooking veggies and other plant-based foods by any reasonable means necessary. I'm perfectly comfortable mentioning the convenience (and lower fat) advantages of non-stick cokware. You might say that's my story and sticking with it. ;)
If people are cooking averse, I'm not sure the type of cookware surface will make that much of a difference, but I guess it's possible.
We all choose to draw our lines somewhere, and anything that is known to give off toxic fumes, when there are safer alternatives, is where I draw mine. Maybe I feel strongly about this because I have birds living with me, but the idea of bits of toxic compounds flaking off into my food is just not a personally appetizing prospect.
So if you are planning to cook for me in the future, remind me to lend you some pots.
We all choose to draw our lines somewhere, and anything that is known to give off toxic fumes, when there are safer alternatives, is where I draw mine. Maybe I feel strongly about this because I have birds living with me, but the idea of bits of toxic compounds flaking off into my food is just not a personally appetizing prospect.
So if you are planning to cook for me in the future, remind me to lend you some pots.
If people are reluctant to cook, convenience makes a huge difference. Maybe more than anything else. And non-stick pans are convenient - that's why so many people use them.
Our homes are full of toxic fumes. Candles give off toxic fumes. Plywood and particle board emit formaldehyde. Flame retardants in clothes and furniture emit harmful chemicals.
I know the fumes from non-stick cookware (at least some non-cook cookware - not all surfaces are the same) are deadly to birds. But not to humans. As we know very well, toxicity in birds cannot be extrapolated to toxicity in humans.
Everything is toxic at some dose - including the vegetables I'm so enthusiastically promoting. The question is, under reasonable circumstances - bascially, not cranking the heat way up, which is something I don't do when using these pans, in part because the food would burn - how much would we have to cook with them before there was some measurable effect on our bodies? I suspect the risk to our health is a million times less than driving fast or driving while talking on a cell phone. Or eating too few vegetables.
Also, if you're using plastic utensils, I think the danger of a chip flaking off into your food is neglible, but if that did happen it would mosty likely pass right through your body.
Again, I'm not forcing you or anybody to use non-stick pans. I can certainly understand why you'd avoid non-stick pans, living with birds. And I fully support anyone else's decision to avoid non-stick cookware, non-organic fruit, microwave ovens, artificial sweeteners, or countless other possible human health hazards. But yes, I do feel comfortable mentioning non-stick cookware in this series because I think in the vast majority of cases, if it helps get someone to cook more healthy food - and with less fat, which is also potentially deadly - the benefits greatly outweight the risks.
I'd be happy to cook for you as long as you don't complain about my cookware. FWIW, if you come over for a Tupperware party, our rather porous old house "breathes" very well.
Post a Comment
Our homes are full of toxic fumes. Candles give off toxic fumes. Plywood and particle board emit formaldehyde. Flame retardants in clothes and furniture emit harmful chemicals.
I know the fumes from non-stick cookware (at least some non-cook cookware - not all surfaces are the same) are deadly to birds. But not to humans. As we know very well, toxicity in birds cannot be extrapolated to toxicity in humans.
Everything is toxic at some dose - including the vegetables I'm so enthusiastically promoting. The question is, under reasonable circumstances - bascially, not cranking the heat way up, which is something I don't do when using these pans, in part because the food would burn - how much would we have to cook with them before there was some measurable effect on our bodies? I suspect the risk to our health is a million times less than driving fast or driving while talking on a cell phone. Or eating too few vegetables.
Also, if you're using plastic utensils, I think the danger of a chip flaking off into your food is neglible, but if that did happen it would mosty likely pass right through your body.
Again, I'm not forcing you or anybody to use non-stick pans. I can certainly understand why you'd avoid non-stick pans, living with birds. And I fully support anyone else's decision to avoid non-stick cookware, non-organic fruit, microwave ovens, artificial sweeteners, or countless other possible human health hazards. But yes, I do feel comfortable mentioning non-stick cookware in this series because I think in the vast majority of cases, if it helps get someone to cook more healthy food - and with less fat, which is also potentially deadly - the benefits greatly outweight the risks.
I'd be happy to cook for you as long as you don't complain about my cookware. FWIW, if you come over for a Tupperware party, our rather porous old house "breathes" very well.



