Essays and Musings on Animals and Society

Monday, February 13, 2006

Let the World See the Stark Difference Between Peaceful Animal Advocacy and Violent Animal Abuse 

From an editorial in Animal People:

"A now 20-year old Canadian Government strategy paper called Defence of the Fur Trade [there's an ugly title] and a similar strategy outline produced a year later by the American Medical Association both described the tactic of neutralizing animal advocacy by associating it with violence.

Simply answering that far more violence is done by trappers, vivisectors, et al misses the point.

Accepting terrorism of any sort invites infiltration and disruption, and ultimately retards the cause, no matter how much of a vicarious feel-good activists may get from a transiently successful 'direct action.'

Critical to remember, as both Defence of the Fur Trade and the AMA strategy pointed out, is that most of the public does not approve of cruelty to animals, when they recognize it."

...

"Animal advocates should be aware that seven years before any ALF or ELF suspect used a pipe bomb, a covert operator named Mary Lou Sappone, hired by former U.S. Surgical Corporation owner Leon Hirsch, in November 1988 set up a fringe activist to be caught in the act of planting a pipe bomb in the U.S. Surgical parking lot.

Why?

Because when the public sees purported animal advocates involved in violence, that violence becomes the story—not the violence going on outside in the woods, in the labs, and inside the slaughterhouses.

The best defense animal advocates have against such duplicitous tactics is to avoid any association with violence, so that agents provocateur become conspicuous.

Convincing the world to treat animals with moral consideration requires activists to keep the high ground, not from fear of arrest, but from the likelihood that appearing to be irrational or dangerous will obscure the message and lead to failure."

Well said.



Next: another animal advocate speaks out against violence, followed by an "on the other hand..." piece.
Comments:
FYI--I have a collection of anonyomous people wearing fur coats.
 
I sort of agree with you/the editorial, and sort of disagree... the radical end of the movement does I think need to increase the amount of "open" direct actions and decrease the amount of venom in their statements, but I think the mainstream needs to treat them with more respect and not just disown them.

(I just wrote a rather longer post responding to this editorial on the wikiveg blog.)
 
Zach, thanks for your very cogent comments. It's a complicated subject. I hope that all persons with an interest in animal protection / liberation will listen with an open mind to peers who favor different strategies to reaching our overwhelmingly unified goal of a compassionate and just world for all creatures.

Great stuff on the wikiveg site.
 
Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?