Essays and Musings on Animals and Society

Sunday, February 26, 2006

Arizona Has Chance to Let the Sun Shine on Factory Farm Animals 

Matthew Scully eloquently describes the horror and moral wrongness of factory farms in this essay: A sunless hell -- confronting the cruel facts of factory-farmed meat. Mr. Scully is one of a growing number of conservatives who condemn our institutionalized abuse of farm animals. The cruelty we foist on these innocent and overwhelmingly gentle creatures is so severe, so troubling, that people of all political stripes are taking notice.

Excerpts:

"Veal, by definition, is the product of a sick, anemic, deliberately malnourished calf, a newborn dragged away from his mother in the first hours of life. Veal calves are dealt the harshest of punishments for the least essential of meats. And if you think people can get too sentimental about animals, try listening sometime to chefs and gourmands going on about the 'velvety smooth succulence' of their favorite fare.

'Cost-saver' in industrial livestock agriculture may usually be taken to mean 'moral shortcut.' For all of its 'science-based' pretensions, factory farming is really just an elaborate, endless series of evasions from the most elementary duties of honest animal husbandry. Man, the rationalizing creature, can justify just about anything when there is money in sight. It's only easier when your victims are so completely out of sight and unable to speak for themselves."

...

"Industry lobbyist Jim Klinker, now director of the Arizona Farm Bureau and lead spokesman against the humane-farming initiative, started things off with a blunt reminder that farm animals aren't pets, and so our sympathy for them is misplaced. 'These people,' Klinker told Tucson Weekly, 'want these animals raised the same way we raise our dogs and cats. I think most people understand that's not how food is produced.'

When you want people to harden their hearts, however, it's probably not such a good idea to invite comparisons between farm animals and dogs or cats. How would your dog react if you stuffed her into a crate in which she could not even stretch or turn around, and never let her out? No human attention or companionship with other animals. No bedding, straw to lie on. No single moment outdoors, ever, to feel the breeze or the warmth of the sun.

Your dog, a being of intelligence and emotional capacities entirely comparable to those of a pig, would beg and wail and whimper and finally fall silent into a state of complete brokenness. And anyone who inflicted such tortures on that animal, no matter what excuses might be offered, would be guilty of a felony. If the creatures are comparable, and the conditions identical, and the suffering equal, how can the one be 'standard practice' and the other a crime?"

The reason Mr. Scully wrote this essay, and the reason it appears in the Arizona Republic, is explained in the opening two paragraphs:

"Arizona voters will be asked this fall to weigh in on a ballot measure called the Humane Treatment of Farm Animals Act, which is now in the signature-gathering stage but, by November, is certain to be one of our livelier election-year debates.

The initiative, modeled on a reform passed by Florida voters, would prohibit the factory-farming practice of confining pigs and veal calves in crates so small that the animals cannot even turn around or extend their limbs."

But just in case the Arizona electorate gets all "sentimental" and votes to make the lives of factory farm animals a little less miserable, they may be in for a rude surprise:

Just this month the industry's allies in the Arizona Legislature proposed a constitutional amendment to bar the public from passing any laws promoting the humane treatment of farm animals, effective Jan. 1, 2006. Nice to have a fallback position: Even if the humane-farming initiative passes by vote of the people, as industry lobbyists apparently fear it will, they plan to nullify the law retroactively.

This is one of the most evil, conniving, vile things I've ever heard of. The animal exploitation industry wants to use the most sacred legal document in the state to permanently condemn animals to cruelty and suffering. And in doing so, they are prepared to flagrantly violate the will of people. This is extremism. Filthy, oppressive, cowardly, utterly merciless extremism.



Related link: Bill pushed to stop any new agriculture rules
Comments: Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?