(If so inclined)
Links: Animals
- Virgil Butler: Ex-Slaughterhouse Worker
- Christian Vegetarian Association
- all-creatures.org
- Episcoveg
- United Poultry Concerns
- Eastern Shore Chicken Sanctuary & Education Center
- Compassion Over Killing
- Vegan Outreach
- In Defense of Animals
- No Eggs
- SHARK (Showing Animals Respect and Kindness)
- Committee to Abolish Sport Hunting
- Animals Voice
- Compassionate Cooks
- Viva! USA
- Assoc. of Veterinarians for Animal Rights
- Care for the Wild
- Vegan Poet
- Humane Society of the United States
- Humane Society Legislative Fund
- Vegan Vanguard
- Foie Gras Cruelty
- Monkeying Around with Human Health
- Stop Animal Exploitation Now
- The Truth About Vivisection
- Save the Chimps
- Release & Restitution for Chimpanzees in US Labs
- Humane Charity Seal of Approval
- Americans For Medical Advancement
- Circuses.com
- Fur-Free Action
- Mercy For Animals: Fur Farms
- Choose Veg
- Meatout Mondays
- Kindness Not Cruelty
- Anti-Fur Society
- Fur-Bearer Defenders
- Coalition to Abolish the Fur Trade
- Heal Our Planet Earth (HOPE)
- Animals in the Wild
- Vegan School 101
- Best Friends Animal Society
- Alley Cat Allies
- Alley Cat Rescue
- Dogs Deserve Better
- International Aid for Korean Animals
- AnimaNaturalis.com (En Espanol)
- Pet Store Cruelty
- Worldwide Vegan Bake Sale
- Vegan Lunch Box * New Link *
- RabbitWise
- Friends of Rabbits
- Metro Ferals (DC area)
- Humane League of Baltimore
- Compassion for Animals
Links: People
- Easter Seals
- Birth Defect Research for Children, Inc. (Better than March of Dimes)
- Street Sense (Opportunity for DC's Poor and Homeless)
- Food For Life * New Link *
Links: Politics and Current Events
Links: Humor
Links: Hard to Categorize
Blogs
- Veg Blog
- Vegan Chai
- Neva Vegan
- Vegan Metal Biker Dad Punk Blog
- SuperWeed
- Super Vegan
- Vegan Momma
- The Joyful Vegan
- Vegan Bits
- Cats and Cows
- Value System: Peak Oil, Gas Prices, Money and The Future
- Invisible Voices
- Peaceful Prairie Animal Sanctuary
- Vegan FAQ
Archives
- 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
- 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004
- 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004
- 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004
- 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004
- 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004
- 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004
- 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004
- 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004
- 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
- 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
- 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
- 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
- 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
- 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
- 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
- 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
- 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
- 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
- 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
- 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
- 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006
- 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
- 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
- 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
- 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006
- 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
- 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
- 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006
- 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
- 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
- 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
- 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
- 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
- 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
- 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007
- 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
- 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
- 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007
- 06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007
- 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007
- 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007
- 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
- 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007
- 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007
- 12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008
- 01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008
- 02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008
- 03/01/2008 - 04/01/2008
- 04/01/2008 - 05/01/2008
- 05/01/2008 - 06/01/2008
- 06/01/2008 - 07/01/2008
- 07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008
- 08/01/2008 - 09/01/2008
- 09/01/2008 - 10/01/2008
- 10/01/2008 - 11/01/2008
- 11/01/2008 - 12/01/2008
- 12/01/2008 - 01/01/2009
- 01/01/2009 - 02/01/2009
- 02/01/2009 - 03/01/2009
- 03/01/2009 - 04/01/2009
- 04/01/2009 - 05/01/2009
Recent Posts
Animal Rights: Animal Welfare with Teeth"It Happens In Nature" - Part 1
Thought for the Day
What They Don't Want You to Know About Eggs
Left Behind
To My Meat-Eating Friends on Memorial Day
Welcome, Rolling Thunder
The Heart of a Chained Elephant
Cruelty Close Up
Radical Cruelty
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]
Essays and Musings on Animals and Society
Sunday, June 05, 2005
Pet Wasteland
In Petland, a nationwide "pet shop" chain, our best friends are reduced to merchandise; inventory; business assets and liabilities. The care provided to dogs, cats, rabbits, birds, and rodents is minimal--it's a business cost. The animals come from "mills" where animals are litter-production machines that live in filthy small cages and get zero human kindness. There is no reason for these horrid places to exist in civilized society. Don't these animals deserve better? Can't we do better?
The following article, republished by permission, is from www.petstorecruelty.org. It has three parts:
Emphases are mine.
PUPPY MILLS
Think about how you felt physically and emotionally the last time you were limited to a small area for only a few hours--taking the SATs, a long car ride, flying on an airplane, sitting through a day-long conference. Antsy? Claustrophobic? Like you would scream if you had to sit there for another day? Now think about having that sensation FOR YOUR ENTIRE LIFE. That is the horrible fate of breeding dogs confined to small cages virtually from birth till death in thousands of commercial breeding facilities, commonly known as puppy mills.
A puppy mill is a facility, large or small, that breeds dogs for profit. These facilities are notorious for ignoring the dogs' physical and emotional needs. The dogs go crazy from boredom, and their bodies waste away. Dogs are usually prized for their boundless enthusiasm and zest for life, but in puppy mills, they receive no compassion, and their spirits are broken. They live and die in pain and misery.
How do you tell if a pet store gets puppies from puppy mills? First of all, pet stores that have a large selection of purebred puppies (say, 20 to 30) year-round are almost guaranteed to be getting dogs from this type of facility, since otherwise they would not be assured of a constant supply.
Second, people who care about puppies look for good homes for them. They do not ship them off to be sold in pet stores.
A third indication that a pet store's puppies are mass-produced in puppy mills is if pet store employees are reluctant to tell you the name of the breeder or where the breeder's facility is located. They may say they get puppies from "private breeders." Puppy mills ARE private breeders. Our local Petland has cited a "strict privacy policy" regarding its breeders. On registration papers provided to customers, it has in several cases, and most likely in many other cases, failed to provide any information about the dog's breeder.
In Virginia, THIS IS ILLEGAL! Section 3.1-796.78 states that pet dealers who sell dogs with registration papers--such as AKC papers--must provide the NAME and ADDRESS of its breeders. Most likely, Petland fears that customers who see Missouri, Kansas, and other Midwestern addresses will think "puppy mills," since the Midwest is "Puppy Mill Central" in the United States. If you or anyone you know purchased a puppy at the Fairfax Petland and received papers that do not contain the breeder's name and address, PLEASE contact us at all4theanimals@yahoo.com.
In the case of Petland, there is clear evidence that Petland has obtained puppies from puppy mills. During an April 2000 Dateline NBC exposé of puppy mills and pet stores, investigators visited two of Petland's "private breeders." One facility housed over 500 dogs; the other, 200 dogs, all in cages. During their investigation at the first breeder, Dateline investigators never saw the dogs let out of the cages, but they did find dogs with neurotic behavior caused by long confinement. They saw filth on and around the dogs, maggot-infested food, timid dogs housed together with aggressive dogs, untreated wounds, broken bones, mange, open sores, and rotted teeth--conditions causing the dogs tremendous pain and long-term suffering.
A former truck driver for the second Petland breeder told Dateline of how her boss ordered her to throw live puppies into a trash burner because they were sick. A sickly puppy purchased at a Petland store was traced to a third facility housing over 200 dogs. That puppy had expensive health problems including hip dysplasia and chronic diarrhea. This is not surprising, as puppy mills are also known for breeding animals with genetic defects as well as breeding dogs as often as possible, causing the mother to wear out and die young after producing many litters of sickly puppies.
After the story aired, generating a huge response from the public, Petland refused to be interviewed by Dateline. Petland merely sent a letter claiming the story was "unfair" and apparently did not pledge to change its operations in any way. If you would like to borrow a copy of the Dateline video, contact us at all4theanimals@yahoo.com.
Petland openly states on its website that it obtains many dogs from USDA-licensed breeders, as if this ensures a certain level of quality and humane care. Is that the case? The USDA requires that anyone with 3 or more breeding dogs who sells animals to pet stores be licensed. It has minimal requirements regarding food, water, sanitation, and space, but enforcement of the USDA's regulations is extremely lax. For example, the USDA requires that the commercial breeders have an exercise plan for the dogs, but they do not make sure that the plan is ever carried out. If more than one dog is housed in a cage, the dogs are not required to ever be let out at all. The USDA's head veterinarian, Ron de Haven, admits that only about half of the roughly 4,000 USDA-licensed facilities even meet USDA's minimum regulations, a disgraceful example of the USDA's failure to enforce existing animal-protection laws.
De Haven attributes this failure to the USDA not having enough inspectors, but even when the inspectors find problems, fining and closing down puppy mills is very rare. The USDA's mission is to support agriculture, and apparently it considers puppy mill owners to be "dog farmers" worthy of its protection. Bottom line: if you buy a puppy from Petland or other pet stores, it's very likely that his or her parents are enduring a lifetime of cruelty.
Petland's puppies also usually come with some kind of registration papers, such as AKC (American Kennel Club). Many people are under the false impression that this means the parent dogs are in good health. As the AKC will tell you itself, that is not true. The papers only mean that the two parent dogs were of the same breed, and the AKC takes the breeder's word that that is the case. (The sickly Petland puppy featured in the Dateline story turned out not even to be a purebred.) Parent dogs can be toothless, lame, undernourished, have serious genetic defects, and still have their litters of puppies registered with the AKC.
Haphazard breeding can result in both physical and behavioral problems. For example, one woman we met had purchased a puppy from the Burke Pet Center, which like Petland obtains puppies from the Hunte Corporation. Although she has successfully housetrained many dogs, she has never been able to fully housetrain this one.
IN-STORE CONDITIONS
Petland's broker (middleman between breeders and pet stores), the Hunte Corporation, is based in Missouri, often considered the puppy mill capital of the country due to its large concentration of puppy mills. Other states with many puppy mills include Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania (especially Lancaster County).
After collecting puppies from many Midwestern breeding facilities, weeding out the sickliest ones to suffer an uncertain fate--most likely death--the Hunte Corporation packs caged puppies into its trucks and drives them to Petlands and other pet stores all over the country, usually a stressful trip of several hundred miles. At the store, having spent their whole life of 8 weeks in cages, the puppies again spend most of their time in small cages.
According to veterinarians, the confinement of large numbers of animals to a small store, with new animals being added all the time, is an invitation to rampant infectious disease. The neatly stacked rows of cages at Petland resemble isolation chambers--ideal for driving people and animals crazy, but not a proper environment for animals adapted to life on this planet through millions of years of evolution. The barren cages do not allow the puppy to experience the outdoors, where a normally developing puppy would be able to see the sky, feel the sun and wind, and run and play with human and canine companions in the dirt and grass and leaves. Small cages do not provide a rich indoor environment for the puppies to explore. Rarely do the puppies ever have a soft surface to lie on, although even in the wild, animals seek out soft nesting spots. All Petland puppies have is a mesh-floored cage (uncomfortable for their feet), maybe a single chew toy, and, if they're lucky, a hard floor tile, about 1 foot by 1 foot, that is supposed to serve as their bed. The sad faces of the puppies entice well-meaning visitors into "rescuing" puppies by buying them, even for the outrageous prices of well over $1,000 per puppy that Petland usually charges (the adoption fee for dogs at our local shelter is $85). Of course, each time they sell a puppy, Petland orders more from the Hunte Corp.--approximately 25 puppies each week for one Petland store.
Since Petland's cages are standardized, one might assume that they are in compliance with all state anti-cruelty laws as well as laws that prohibit the sale of certain species, but this is not necessarily the case. The Petland in Fairfax, Virginia, was found to be in violation of the Virginia state law that prohibits pet stores from housing puppies in cages in which their feet could fall through the mesh. This went on for many months, even though it was obvious to any observer that the tiny puppies, such as Chihuahuas and Toy Rat Terriers, could only hobble painfully around their cages, their legs falling through the mesh each time they tried to move.
The Fairfax Petland also failed to consistently provide a solid resting platform until ordered to do so by Animal Control. When it did, it used one or two hard floor tiles that were still not completely solid. Some of the larger puppies, such as the Golden Retrievers, could only fit their two front legs on the tiles, not their whole body, as required by law. Recently, when a citizen reported the absence of ANY resting platforms in the cages, Petland admitted to police that it removes the platforms each night because they make a mess. This is against the law.
Petland was also selling one or more tarantulas, even though tarantulas are prohibited as pets in our county.
Puppies are by no means the only animals suffering in Petland stores. Petland also sells kittens, rabbits, parakeets, parrots, chinchillas, ferrets, hamsters, fish, and a variety of other animals. Because even fewer laws protect these animals, they most likely come from breeding and warehousing facilities even worse than puppy mills. These animals are also housed in cramped cages or aquariums at the store and are sold with a minimum of instruction on how to properly care for them. This can lead to premature death, abandonment, and for long-lived species such as parrots, many years of suffering in an inadequate environment.
People who take jobs at Petland because they love animals sooner or later find out, as one told us, "It's all about time and money." This employee saw a lot of deaths among the small animals at the Fairfax City store, particularly birds and hamsters, and saw that many of the puppies arrived with respiratory problems. The puppies also had sores from lying on the hard mesh cage floors. Another Fairfax City Petland employee tried to nurture the puppies and was told something along the lines of (not a direct quote), "They don't need petting; they're just money. If you want to do that, go to the shelter." An employee from another Petland told us that puppies are taken from their mothers at 5 weeks old and go through so much stress and handling that Petland recommends that once the puppy arrives at the store, he or she be left alone for 48 hours. Our local Petland puts puppies on display immediately, and they are available for sale about 24 hours later.
One customer of the Fairfax Petland unknowingly purchased a dog with hereditary defect that makes simple anesthesia a grave risk to the dog's life, so that any situation requiring anesthesia, even spaying or neutering, can be fatal. Another puppy purchased at the Fairfax Petland developed a cough within a couple of days. Because it was the weekend, the dog had to be taken to an emergency clinic, voiding the Petland warranty, which requires that the dog be brought to a particular vet who works with Petland. Neighbors have seen the huge truck that arrives with its weekly delivery and heard the cries of the puppies as they are unloaded.
Several local vets who have treated puppies purchased at the Fairfax Petland have stated that the many of the puppies are sick. One said, "I HATE Petland!" Another said of a Petland puppy, "This puppy is a walking time bomb." A local trainer working with Petland puppies found many of them unsocialized, extremely difficult to train, and mentally and emotionally ill.
If you purchased a sick puppy at the Fairfax Petland, please contact us at all4theanimals@yahoo.com. We are not going to give out names of vets, former employees, and other people who give us information about Petland unless specifically given permission. But we will encourage people to ask their vets about the health of pet-store puppies, and they will be able to confirm what these experts are saying.
HOMELESS ANIMAL CRISIS
All this abuse is made worse by the fact that it is completely unnecessary. Petland sells animals for one reason only--profit--in flagrant disregard for the homeless animal crisis not only in our local area but the entire country. In 2003, in Virginia alone, over 60,000 dogs and 73,000 cats were killed in animal shelters. Nationwide, year after year, a minimum of 3 million dogs and 4 million cats are killed in U.S. animal shelters due to lack of homes. For dogs alone, that's 6 killed every minute, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. It's estimated that a quarter of the dogs killed in shelters are purebreds. If you have trouble visualizing this tragedy because of the huge numbers of animals involved, please go to www.pleaserescueme.com/gone.cfm to see just a few of the innocent animals who have been killed simply for lack of homes.
The vast majority of the animals killed in shelters are healthy, friendly, and young. The 7 million dead does not even include the animals being killed outside shelters (for example, Greyhounds bred for racing and slaughtered when their racing days are over). While our local shelters and rescue groups struggle valiantly to rescue homeless animals, spending their energy and money to save innocent lives, Petland's contribution is to pump mass-produced animals into our community, as well as similar communities all over the country.
Because the number of small animals killed due to homelessness is not even counted at shelters, many people are unaware that there is a homeless animal crisis among small animals, too. Our local rescue groups cannot even begin to save all the rabbits, birds, ferrets, iguanas, and many other small animals that desperately need homes.
Please do not buy ANY animal at a pet store, but please do contact local shelters and rescue groups (both purebred and mixed breed groups) if you can provide an animal with a good home.
Three of the many salient points in this article:
The problem is not the number of purebred animals given up to shelters the figure that breeders like to focus on but the number of animals sold by breeders to people who might otherwise adopt a shelter animal.
It would be a mistake to presume that everyone who buys an animal from a breeder would categorically rule out an animal from a shelter. Pet stores and breeders work to attract buyers, through advertisements, cat shows, web sites, special edition magazines that highlight purebreds, and of course kittens and puppies in the window. Potential adopters who do not have their heart set on buying an animal from a breeder or pet store may be swayed by any of these marketing tactics, but would have been just as happy with a shelter animal. This is what I see repeatedly from my volunteering at a shelter. Shelter animals of course have just as much personality and love as any animal from a breeder. At the shelter, the adult animals' personalities are more established and predictable, there is enormous variety in terms of age and temperament, and best of all the adopter is saving a life.
Even if we assume very conservatively that only 20 percent of the families that buy an animal from a breeder are the "swing group" that could go either way, we're still talking millions enough to empty the cages of shelters and rescue groups across the country.
Most "responsible" breeders claim that they don't do it for the money, but for the love of the animals. Many do it more as a hobby than a source of income. To these breeders I have a respectful but urgent request: Stop at least until we clear almost all those shelter cages. If you love animals, please help the homeless animals languishing in cages find a home. Temporarily redirect your customers to the nearest animal shelter. Tell them that the shelter Siamese will be just as talkative and lively as the one from a breeder, and that the shelter Siamese is in a more desperate situation: her long-time owners abandoned her when they moved. Please let your customers know that the mixed breeds, the ones that never show up in breed books, purr, wag their tails, scrunch their noses, and kiss you just as delightfully as any pedigree animals, and that they would make a perfect addition to a family.
Here is a letter that says what I just said, only much more eloquently:
A letter to dog breeders
The following article, republished by permission, is from www.petstorecruelty.org. It has three parts:
- The unethical and disgusting treatment of animals in puppy mills.
- The bleak conditions to which Petland subjects animals that have a fundamental need for socialization, play, companionship, and stimulation.
- The harm done to shelter animals by pet stores like Petland.
Emphases are mine.
PUPPY MILLS
Think about how you felt physically and emotionally the last time you were limited to a small area for only a few hours--taking the SATs, a long car ride, flying on an airplane, sitting through a day-long conference. Antsy? Claustrophobic? Like you would scream if you had to sit there for another day? Now think about having that sensation FOR YOUR ENTIRE LIFE. That is the horrible fate of breeding dogs confined to small cages virtually from birth till death in thousands of commercial breeding facilities, commonly known as puppy mills.
A puppy mill is a facility, large or small, that breeds dogs for profit. These facilities are notorious for ignoring the dogs' physical and emotional needs. The dogs go crazy from boredom, and their bodies waste away. Dogs are usually prized for their boundless enthusiasm and zest for life, but in puppy mills, they receive no compassion, and their spirits are broken. They live and die in pain and misery.
How do you tell if a pet store gets puppies from puppy mills? First of all, pet stores that have a large selection of purebred puppies (say, 20 to 30) year-round are almost guaranteed to be getting dogs from this type of facility, since otherwise they would not be assured of a constant supply.
Second, people who care about puppies look for good homes for them. They do not ship them off to be sold in pet stores.
A third indication that a pet store's puppies are mass-produced in puppy mills is if pet store employees are reluctant to tell you the name of the breeder or where the breeder's facility is located. They may say they get puppies from "private breeders." Puppy mills ARE private breeders. Our local Petland has cited a "strict privacy policy" regarding its breeders. On registration papers provided to customers, it has in several cases, and most likely in many other cases, failed to provide any information about the dog's breeder.
In Virginia, THIS IS ILLEGAL! Section 3.1-796.78 states that pet dealers who sell dogs with registration papers--such as AKC papers--must provide the NAME and ADDRESS of its breeders. Most likely, Petland fears that customers who see Missouri, Kansas, and other Midwestern addresses will think "puppy mills," since the Midwest is "Puppy Mill Central" in the United States. If you or anyone you know purchased a puppy at the Fairfax Petland and received papers that do not contain the breeder's name and address, PLEASE contact us at all4theanimals@yahoo.com.
In the case of Petland, there is clear evidence that Petland has obtained puppies from puppy mills. During an April 2000 Dateline NBC exposé of puppy mills and pet stores, investigators visited two of Petland's "private breeders." One facility housed over 500 dogs; the other, 200 dogs, all in cages. During their investigation at the first breeder, Dateline investigators never saw the dogs let out of the cages, but they did find dogs with neurotic behavior caused by long confinement. They saw filth on and around the dogs, maggot-infested food, timid dogs housed together with aggressive dogs, untreated wounds, broken bones, mange, open sores, and rotted teeth--conditions causing the dogs tremendous pain and long-term suffering.
A former truck driver for the second Petland breeder told Dateline of how her boss ordered her to throw live puppies into a trash burner because they were sick. A sickly puppy purchased at a Petland store was traced to a third facility housing over 200 dogs. That puppy had expensive health problems including hip dysplasia and chronic diarrhea. This is not surprising, as puppy mills are also known for breeding animals with genetic defects as well as breeding dogs as often as possible, causing the mother to wear out and die young after producing many litters of sickly puppies.
After the story aired, generating a huge response from the public, Petland refused to be interviewed by Dateline. Petland merely sent a letter claiming the story was "unfair" and apparently did not pledge to change its operations in any way. If you would like to borrow a copy of the Dateline video, contact us at all4theanimals@yahoo.com.
Petland openly states on its website that it obtains many dogs from USDA-licensed breeders, as if this ensures a certain level of quality and humane care. Is that the case? The USDA requires that anyone with 3 or more breeding dogs who sells animals to pet stores be licensed. It has minimal requirements regarding food, water, sanitation, and space, but enforcement of the USDA's regulations is extremely lax. For example, the USDA requires that the commercial breeders have an exercise plan for the dogs, but they do not make sure that the plan is ever carried out. If more than one dog is housed in a cage, the dogs are not required to ever be let out at all. The USDA's head veterinarian, Ron de Haven, admits that only about half of the roughly 4,000 USDA-licensed facilities even meet USDA's minimum regulations, a disgraceful example of the USDA's failure to enforce existing animal-protection laws.
De Haven attributes this failure to the USDA not having enough inspectors, but even when the inspectors find problems, fining and closing down puppy mills is very rare. The USDA's mission is to support agriculture, and apparently it considers puppy mill owners to be "dog farmers" worthy of its protection. Bottom line: if you buy a puppy from Petland or other pet stores, it's very likely that his or her parents are enduring a lifetime of cruelty.
Petland's puppies also usually come with some kind of registration papers, such as AKC (American Kennel Club). Many people are under the false impression that this means the parent dogs are in good health. As the AKC will tell you itself, that is not true. The papers only mean that the two parent dogs were of the same breed, and the AKC takes the breeder's word that that is the case. (The sickly Petland puppy featured in the Dateline story turned out not even to be a purebred.) Parent dogs can be toothless, lame, undernourished, have serious genetic defects, and still have their litters of puppies registered with the AKC.
Haphazard breeding can result in both physical and behavioral problems. For example, one woman we met had purchased a puppy from the Burke Pet Center, which like Petland obtains puppies from the Hunte Corporation. Although she has successfully housetrained many dogs, she has never been able to fully housetrain this one.
IN-STORE CONDITIONS
Petland's broker (middleman between breeders and pet stores), the Hunte Corporation, is based in Missouri, often considered the puppy mill capital of the country due to its large concentration of puppy mills. Other states with many puppy mills include Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania (especially Lancaster County).
After collecting puppies from many Midwestern breeding facilities, weeding out the sickliest ones to suffer an uncertain fate--most likely death--the Hunte Corporation packs caged puppies into its trucks and drives them to Petlands and other pet stores all over the country, usually a stressful trip of several hundred miles. At the store, having spent their whole life of 8 weeks in cages, the puppies again spend most of their time in small cages.
According to veterinarians, the confinement of large numbers of animals to a small store, with new animals being added all the time, is an invitation to rampant infectious disease. The neatly stacked rows of cages at Petland resemble isolation chambers--ideal for driving people and animals crazy, but not a proper environment for animals adapted to life on this planet through millions of years of evolution. The barren cages do not allow the puppy to experience the outdoors, where a normally developing puppy would be able to see the sky, feel the sun and wind, and run and play with human and canine companions in the dirt and grass and leaves. Small cages do not provide a rich indoor environment for the puppies to explore. Rarely do the puppies ever have a soft surface to lie on, although even in the wild, animals seek out soft nesting spots. All Petland puppies have is a mesh-floored cage (uncomfortable for their feet), maybe a single chew toy, and, if they're lucky, a hard floor tile, about 1 foot by 1 foot, that is supposed to serve as their bed. The sad faces of the puppies entice well-meaning visitors into "rescuing" puppies by buying them, even for the outrageous prices of well over $1,000 per puppy that Petland usually charges (the adoption fee for dogs at our local shelter is $85). Of course, each time they sell a puppy, Petland orders more from the Hunte Corp.--approximately 25 puppies each week for one Petland store.
Since Petland's cages are standardized, one might assume that they are in compliance with all state anti-cruelty laws as well as laws that prohibit the sale of certain species, but this is not necessarily the case. The Petland in Fairfax, Virginia, was found to be in violation of the Virginia state law that prohibits pet stores from housing puppies in cages in which their feet could fall through the mesh. This went on for many months, even though it was obvious to any observer that the tiny puppies, such as Chihuahuas and Toy Rat Terriers, could only hobble painfully around their cages, their legs falling through the mesh each time they tried to move.
The Fairfax Petland also failed to consistently provide a solid resting platform until ordered to do so by Animal Control. When it did, it used one or two hard floor tiles that were still not completely solid. Some of the larger puppies, such as the Golden Retrievers, could only fit their two front legs on the tiles, not their whole body, as required by law. Recently, when a citizen reported the absence of ANY resting platforms in the cages, Petland admitted to police that it removes the platforms each night because they make a mess. This is against the law.
Petland was also selling one or more tarantulas, even though tarantulas are prohibited as pets in our county.
Puppies are by no means the only animals suffering in Petland stores. Petland also sells kittens, rabbits, parakeets, parrots, chinchillas, ferrets, hamsters, fish, and a variety of other animals. Because even fewer laws protect these animals, they most likely come from breeding and warehousing facilities even worse than puppy mills. These animals are also housed in cramped cages or aquariums at the store and are sold with a minimum of instruction on how to properly care for them. This can lead to premature death, abandonment, and for long-lived species such as parrots, many years of suffering in an inadequate environment.
People who take jobs at Petland because they love animals sooner or later find out, as one told us, "It's all about time and money." This employee saw a lot of deaths among the small animals at the Fairfax City store, particularly birds and hamsters, and saw that many of the puppies arrived with respiratory problems. The puppies also had sores from lying on the hard mesh cage floors. Another Fairfax City Petland employee tried to nurture the puppies and was told something along the lines of (not a direct quote), "They don't need petting; they're just money. If you want to do that, go to the shelter." An employee from another Petland told us that puppies are taken from their mothers at 5 weeks old and go through so much stress and handling that Petland recommends that once the puppy arrives at the store, he or she be left alone for 48 hours. Our local Petland puts puppies on display immediately, and they are available for sale about 24 hours later.
One customer of the Fairfax Petland unknowingly purchased a dog with hereditary defect that makes simple anesthesia a grave risk to the dog's life, so that any situation requiring anesthesia, even spaying or neutering, can be fatal. Another puppy purchased at the Fairfax Petland developed a cough within a couple of days. Because it was the weekend, the dog had to be taken to an emergency clinic, voiding the Petland warranty, which requires that the dog be brought to a particular vet who works with Petland. Neighbors have seen the huge truck that arrives with its weekly delivery and heard the cries of the puppies as they are unloaded.
Several local vets who have treated puppies purchased at the Fairfax Petland have stated that the many of the puppies are sick. One said, "I HATE Petland!" Another said of a Petland puppy, "This puppy is a walking time bomb." A local trainer working with Petland puppies found many of them unsocialized, extremely difficult to train, and mentally and emotionally ill.
If you purchased a sick puppy at the Fairfax Petland, please contact us at all4theanimals@yahoo.com. We are not going to give out names of vets, former employees, and other people who give us information about Petland unless specifically given permission. But we will encourage people to ask their vets about the health of pet-store puppies, and they will be able to confirm what these experts are saying.
HOMELESS ANIMAL CRISIS
All this abuse is made worse by the fact that it is completely unnecessary. Petland sells animals for one reason only--profit--in flagrant disregard for the homeless animal crisis not only in our local area but the entire country. In 2003, in Virginia alone, over 60,000 dogs and 73,000 cats were killed in animal shelters. Nationwide, year after year, a minimum of 3 million dogs and 4 million cats are killed in U.S. animal shelters due to lack of homes. For dogs alone, that's 6 killed every minute, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. It's estimated that a quarter of the dogs killed in shelters are purebreds. If you have trouble visualizing this tragedy because of the huge numbers of animals involved, please go to www.pleaserescueme.com/gone.cfm to see just a few of the innocent animals who have been killed simply for lack of homes.
The vast majority of the animals killed in shelters are healthy, friendly, and young. The 7 million dead does not even include the animals being killed outside shelters (for example, Greyhounds bred for racing and slaughtered when their racing days are over). While our local shelters and rescue groups struggle valiantly to rescue homeless animals, spending their energy and money to save innocent lives, Petland's contribution is to pump mass-produced animals into our community, as well as similar communities all over the country.
Because the number of small animals killed due to homelessness is not even counted at shelters, many people are unaware that there is a homeless animal crisis among small animals, too. Our local rescue groups cannot even begin to save all the rabbits, birds, ferrets, iguanas, and many other small animals that desperately need homes.
Please do not buy ANY animal at a pet store, but please do contact local shelters and rescue groups (both purebred and mixed breed groups) if you can provide an animal with a good home.
Three of the many salient points in this article:
- It's easy to masquerade as a "responsible" breeder.
- AKC papers are not much of a guarantee of anything.
- Shelter animals' chances of finding a home are reduced by having to compete with animals from breeders.
The problem is not the number of purebred animals given up to shelters the figure that breeders like to focus on but the number of animals sold by breeders to people who might otherwise adopt a shelter animal.
It would be a mistake to presume that everyone who buys an animal from a breeder would categorically rule out an animal from a shelter. Pet stores and breeders work to attract buyers, through advertisements, cat shows, web sites, special edition magazines that highlight purebreds, and of course kittens and puppies in the window. Potential adopters who do not have their heart set on buying an animal from a breeder or pet store may be swayed by any of these marketing tactics, but would have been just as happy with a shelter animal. This is what I see repeatedly from my volunteering at a shelter. Shelter animals of course have just as much personality and love as any animal from a breeder. At the shelter, the adult animals' personalities are more established and predictable, there is enormous variety in terms of age and temperament, and best of all the adopter is saving a life.
Even if we assume very conservatively that only 20 percent of the families that buy an animal from a breeder are the "swing group" that could go either way, we're still talking millions enough to empty the cages of shelters and rescue groups across the country.
Most "responsible" breeders claim that they don't do it for the money, but for the love of the animals. Many do it more as a hobby than a source of income. To these breeders I have a respectful but urgent request: Stop at least until we clear almost all those shelter cages. If you love animals, please help the homeless animals languishing in cages find a home. Temporarily redirect your customers to the nearest animal shelter. Tell them that the shelter Siamese will be just as talkative and lively as the one from a breeder, and that the shelter Siamese is in a more desperate situation: her long-time owners abandoned her when they moved. Please let your customers know that the mixed breeds, the ones that never show up in breed books, purr, wag their tails, scrunch their noses, and kiss you just as delightfully as any pedigree animals, and that they would make a perfect addition to a family.
Here is a letter that says what I just said, only much more eloquently:
A letter to dog breeders
Comments:
Gary, for the first time I stand in 100% agreement with one of your posts! Puppy mills suck and the conditions in some pet stores are abhorrent. There is simply no other way to say it. I find the part about selling tarantulas interesting. Now, if tarantulas are indeed illegal in this particular locality, they should not be violating the law and selling them. My question is, why have a law prohibiting them? Contrary to what you see in the movies, tarantulas are not dangerous to people. They can bite, but their venom is not toxic,like say, that of a black widow is. Most of the common "pet" species like the Chilean Rose and Mexican Red-Knee are docile enough to be handled even by gentle, supervised children. One is more likely to be bitten by the commonly kept, ill-tempered rodent known as the hamster than by the common tarantula species. Weird law that seems to based more on biological ignorance more than a legitimate safety concern.
BTW, I see you have several military links on your blog. Are you a veteran? If so, thank you for your service to our country.
BTW, I see you have several military links on your blog. Are you a veteran? If so, thank you for your service to our country.
I know tarantulas are not poisonous, but beyond that I must confess ignorance. (Can you or anyone recommend a a good source of information on them?) I suspect that like most animals of which there is widespread ignorance, they are mistreated in alarmingly high proportions when they are a pet. I could be wrong; I base that guesstimate on my experience with other species.
It is probably no surprise that I am in favor of considerably more regulation of companion animals. I can't imagine living without an animal but that sacrifice is tiny compared to the abuse that too many animals face. I'm not in favoring of outlawing pets, just drastically overhauling the system. Details to follow. I say "drastically" but the truly responsible and caring would have to change very little, and I'd bet within less than a generation of their implementation that Gary's "drastic" rules are "ho-hum, no big deal" accepted with minimal complaints.
Gary
It is probably no surprise that I am in favor of considerably more regulation of companion animals. I can't imagine living without an animal but that sacrifice is tiny compared to the abuse that too many animals face. I'm not in favoring of outlawing pets, just drastically overhauling the system. Details to follow. I say "drastically" but the truly responsible and caring would have to change very little, and I'd bet within less than a generation of their implementation that Gary's "drastic" rules are "ho-hum, no big deal" accepted with minimal complaints.
Gary
BTW, I'm not a veteran, but I work with them and have some in my family, and I greatly appreciate their sacrifice.
Gary, in one of my comments regarding one of your other posts, I expressed concern about the "animal police" and the possiblity that such a concept could stand as a threat to basic civil rights. You basically stated that you thought my fears about this are unfounded. Well, the evidence is in. Big Brother is indeed watching and the "animal police" are already here. I don't know if you saw it, but last week ABC's 20/20 aired an expose' by John Stossel concerning local SPCA's being granted law enforcement responsibilities regarding animal welfare, and these SPCA's growing abuse of power. This expose' was one year of investigations in the making. Among the discoveries:
-raids and confiscations of animals without search warrants
-confiscation of property (animals) without the accused being afforded the full due process of law
-confiscation of property without the accused being convicted of a crime
-a Texas law that states that once a single judge upholds an SPCA's confiscation, the animals owners do not have a right to appeal to a higher court, effectively denying them full due process. Again, this is even if they have not been convicted of crime.
-SPCA's selling confiscated animals and keeping the money for themselves.
If you did not see this report, I encourage you to read about it. You can find the transcript, as well as an excellent commentary about it, at this blog: http://brianoconnor.typepad.com/animal_crackers . Scroll down the page to June 4th I believe, and you will find the post. This is an anti-AR blog ( probably the best one on the web) and the blogger's name is Brian O'Connor. Brian is a retired professor at the University of Indiana College of Medicine. As a professor of medicine , Professor O'Connor is a staunch defender of animal research. You will not agree with his points, but he is always thought provoking. His command of logic and reason is impressive and he states the case against AR much better than I do, and is certainly much more qualified to do so than I am.
Back to the ABC piece, do you find it disquieting, as I do, that in the United States, a private, special interest group such as an SPCA ( or for that matter any other private group) can be granted law enforcement powers? Law enforcement powers should be reserved for government entities ONLY. Why? Because private entities like these SPCA's are largely not accountable to the people. They have no civilian review boards, no Congressional oversight, and they cannot be removed from office through recall, impeachment, or the election process. These people could just as easily come for you or me and our pets as they did the people in this report, and they apparently need little firm probable cause to do so. Welcome to Police State USA.
As for tarantulas, I am not an expert on them, but I think if you go to a search engine, you will get some good web sites on them. I once volunteered at a nature center where we had a tarantula. It was a very docile creature, and we would take her out and let children who were not frightened handle her. Here's an interesting fact about spiders that I read. Did you know that without spiders, life on Earth for higher animals, including us, would be almost impossible? Spiders do the bulk of the world's natural insect control, and without them the Earth's ecosystems would be ravaged by overpopulation of insects.
-raids and confiscations of animals without search warrants
-confiscation of property (animals) without the accused being afforded the full due process of law
-confiscation of property without the accused being convicted of a crime
-a Texas law that states that once a single judge upholds an SPCA's confiscation, the animals owners do not have a right to appeal to a higher court, effectively denying them full due process. Again, this is even if they have not been convicted of crime.
-SPCA's selling confiscated animals and keeping the money for themselves.
If you did not see this report, I encourage you to read about it. You can find the transcript, as well as an excellent commentary about it, at this blog: http://brianoconnor.typepad.com/animal_crackers . Scroll down the page to June 4th I believe, and you will find the post. This is an anti-AR blog ( probably the best one on the web) and the blogger's name is Brian O'Connor. Brian is a retired professor at the University of Indiana College of Medicine. As a professor of medicine , Professor O'Connor is a staunch defender of animal research. You will not agree with his points, but he is always thought provoking. His command of logic and reason is impressive and he states the case against AR much better than I do, and is certainly much more qualified to do so than I am.
Back to the ABC piece, do you find it disquieting, as I do, that in the United States, a private, special interest group such as an SPCA ( or for that matter any other private group) can be granted law enforcement powers? Law enforcement powers should be reserved for government entities ONLY. Why? Because private entities like these SPCA's are largely not accountable to the people. They have no civilian review boards, no Congressional oversight, and they cannot be removed from office through recall, impeachment, or the election process. These people could just as easily come for you or me and our pets as they did the people in this report, and they apparently need little firm probable cause to do so. Welcome to Police State USA.
As for tarantulas, I am not an expert on them, but I think if you go to a search engine, you will get some good web sites on them. I once volunteered at a nature center where we had a tarantula. It was a very docile creature, and we would take her out and let children who were not frightened handle her. Here's an interesting fact about spiders that I read. Did you know that without spiders, life on Earth for higher animals, including us, would be almost impossible? Spiders do the bulk of the world's natural insect control, and without them the Earth's ecosystems would be ravaged by overpopulation of insects.
I knew of this report but did not watch it. In the past I've found Mr. Stossel's pieces to be completely one-sided and ommitting tons of information that would change the story drastically.
I don't dispute that that there are excesses on the animal right side. They're dwarfed by the excesses on the other side. If the animal "police" are so powerful, why is almmost every conceivable animal cruelty done routinely every day with impunity? Why are massive Midwestern puppy mills still in business and thriving? Why is against the law to sue the California milk board for fraud or animal labs for animal cruelty?
There is so much power and influence in the animal killing industries comapred to the animal rights movement it's not even funny. For every alleged break-in by an AR activist, there are a dozen, maybe a hundred, horrific beatings by an animal trainer who gets no punishment. Ringling does joint exercises with the USDA. The USDA chief of staff and deputy chief of staff are from the powerful National Cattleman's Association. Thhen there's the so-called liberal media. PBS has a program on farm life that ignores factory farms. ABC's Primetime Live recently showed how chimps could be gently trained to act. What they didn't tell you was that the trainer, Sidney Yost, has been charged with multiple Animal Welfare Act violations, and that he and most chimp trainers use physical punishment on the animals. The deck is stacked so heavily on the anti-animal side it's not even close. Your fears are misplaced.
I don't dispute that that there are excesses on the animal right side. They're dwarfed by the excesses on the other side. If the animal "police" are so powerful, why is almmost every conceivable animal cruelty done routinely every day with impunity? Why are massive Midwestern puppy mills still in business and thriving? Why is against the law to sue the California milk board for fraud or animal labs for animal cruelty?
There is so much power and influence in the animal killing industries comapred to the animal rights movement it's not even funny. For every alleged break-in by an AR activist, there are a dozen, maybe a hundred, horrific beatings by an animal trainer who gets no punishment. Ringling does joint exercises with the USDA. The USDA chief of staff and deputy chief of staff are from the powerful National Cattleman's Association. Thhen there's the so-called liberal media. PBS has a program on farm life that ignores factory farms. ABC's Primetime Live recently showed how chimps could be gently trained to act. What they didn't tell you was that the trainer, Sidney Yost, has been charged with multiple Animal Welfare Act violations, and that he and most chimp trainers use physical punishment on the animals. The deck is stacked so heavily on the anti-animal side it's not even close. Your fears are misplaced.
One more thing I have to say...I've worked with a number of animal shelters and rescue leagues over the last few years. I cannot even being to tell you what these folks have to put up with. It is simply amazing and what people will do to animals. The shelter folks work for little or no money and do the best they can to take care of the huge number of animals that people abandon and mistreat. Hoarders, abusers, liars, hunters who let their dogs go at the end of the season, backyard breeders, and so forth. Burnout and stress are rampant. One director I work with had a gun pointed at his head by the owner of a dog that was in such basd shape it was hard to determine if he was dead or alive. Please, I don't know if John Stossel has an axe to grind or what, but please have mercy on the wonderful folks I see giving some comfort and hope to animals.
I'm sure that with thousands of SPCAs some will be corrupt. The ones I've worked with cannot handle the present volume of animals. They don't need to steal animals. They want to find homes - good, permanent homes - for all the homeless animals. Not just dogs and cats but rabbits, birds, guinea pigs, and hampsters. The goal of all well-run shelters is to put themselves out of business some day. It infuriates me to see such hard-working, dedicated, compassionate people unfairly tagged as criminals.
Gary
I'm sure that with thousands of SPCAs some will be corrupt. The ones I've worked with cannot handle the present volume of animals. They don't need to steal animals. They want to find homes - good, permanent homes - for all the homeless animals. Not just dogs and cats but rabbits, birds, guinea pigs, and hampsters. The goal of all well-run shelters is to put themselves out of business some day. It infuriates me to see such hard-working, dedicated, compassionate people unfairly tagged as criminals.
Gary
A couple more thoughts ---
Let me answer one of my own questions. One of the reasons that the abuses in puppy mills, circuses, rodeos, slaughterhouses, and other venues persist is because there are far too few inspections. There's no way the USDA's less than one thousand inspectors can provide any more than cursory oversight for the multitude of facilities covered under the minimal regulations of the Animal Welfare Act. Furthermore, there is reliable evidence that "unnounced" inspections are frequently announced. The problem isn't over-policing but under-policing.
Far more threatening to me than the possibility of animal police checking on my pets is pending anti-terrorism legislation that specifically targets animal rights and environmental groups. Protest the wrong things and you're singled out. (By contrast, anti-abortion groups that have intentionally gone after people are not singled out.) The language in these bills is vague enough to treat whistleblowers as terrorists, and in fact, as previously mentioned, this has already started to occur. I'll be on a government watch list because of my blog long before the animal police come to my door.
I've been to the anti-AR site you mention. Let's just say that our opinions differ. If I had the time, and thought it would do any good, I'd debate the host right down the line - on nearly every topic, plus ones I'd introduce. I used to do that. But it inevitably leads to an endless stalemate, and no one's mind is changed. That's one reason I don't have more animal research posts on the blog. The cost-benefit ratio compared to other pressing animal issues is lousy.
Thanks for the info on tarantulas. Yes, it is humbling to know that if humans were wiped out, life for most species on earth would be the same or better, but if tarantulas, or even termites, were to perish, so would we.
BTW, do you have a name? You can stay anonymous, I respect that, but maybe you have a nickname you're comfortable with. Seems a little more personable than calling you anon.
Let me answer one of my own questions. One of the reasons that the abuses in puppy mills, circuses, rodeos, slaughterhouses, and other venues persist is because there are far too few inspections. There's no way the USDA's less than one thousand inspectors can provide any more than cursory oversight for the multitude of facilities covered under the minimal regulations of the Animal Welfare Act. Furthermore, there is reliable evidence that "unnounced" inspections are frequently announced. The problem isn't over-policing but under-policing.
Far more threatening to me than the possibility of animal police checking on my pets is pending anti-terrorism legislation that specifically targets animal rights and environmental groups. Protest the wrong things and you're singled out. (By contrast, anti-abortion groups that have intentionally gone after people are not singled out.) The language in these bills is vague enough to treat whistleblowers as terrorists, and in fact, as previously mentioned, this has already started to occur. I'll be on a government watch list because of my blog long before the animal police come to my door.
I've been to the anti-AR site you mention. Let's just say that our opinions differ. If I had the time, and thought it would do any good, I'd debate the host right down the line - on nearly every topic, plus ones I'd introduce. I used to do that. But it inevitably leads to an endless stalemate, and no one's mind is changed. That's one reason I don't have more animal research posts on the blog. The cost-benefit ratio compared to other pressing animal issues is lousy.
Thanks for the info on tarantulas. Yes, it is humbling to know that if humans were wiped out, life for most species on earth would be the same or better, but if tarantulas, or even termites, were to perish, so would we.
BTW, do you have a name? You can stay anonymous, I respect that, but maybe you have a nickname you're comfortable with. Seems a little more personable than calling you anon.
I understand what ur trying to say, but I'm sure its hard for Petland to be accomodating all these new pets they're receiving. I'm sure they don't have the time or mney to be making huse fenced in areas so the puppies can run around, especially if the store is in a big city. Where are they going to get the room to do all this, in the parking lot? I love animals so don't get the wrong impression about me, I'm just trying to make how hard it is for pet stores clear. I also hate puppy mills, it's cruel and inhuman what they're doing, but, where else would you find so many puppies without taking them out of the wild. How else would pet stores find enough puppies for the thousands that want them? Please don't get the wrong impression of me.
Thank you for your thoughtful comments. I think puppy mills and pet stores like Petland that serve as a distribution network for puppy mill-created animals are an abomination and should not exist. Currently there are millions of dogs in shelters that need homes. Once we find homes for them, which will take decades at least, then breeding companion animals must be much more regulated to ensure their well-being, and to prevent a surplus of animals. There is no moral justification for puppy mills or pet stores that buy from them or that provide unsuitable conditions for the animals. Such operations are unjustifiable on animal welfare grounds. If the only way to provide companion animals to humans is to make the animals miserable, and kill far too many along the way, it's not worth it.
A reasonable model for breeding that is less ethically objectionable is the small cat breeder who raises the cats in comfortable home settings, gives them proper care, attention, and socialization, and carefully screens prospective owners/guardians. This costs more; so be it. Misery is cheaper and more profitable but wrong. Slavery and child labor are cheap, too, and at one time we rationalized that they were essential to the economy, but then as now, we were merely exploiting those without power. People who really want an animal, who have the committment to take care of an animal for life, and who have the financial means to support the animal's needs, will gladly pay more for the animal, especially if they know that the higher fees ensure the animals' welfare. Impulse buyers and those who don't have the dedication or money to properly care for an animal will balk at higher upfront costs - and that is a good thing; there are far too many animals in homes that should not have animals. As a rescue league volunteer, I have seen how the animals in these homes suffer; sometimes it is heartbreaking. Keep in mind that by far the greatest monetary outlay in caring for an animal is not the upfront fee but the day-to-day expenses and the veterinary treatment that tends to become more costly as the animal ages.
There are many other issues involved in breeding that are outside the scope of this thread. For instance, the preoccupation with looks has been to the detriment of the animals' health. If it were up to me, in the future, I would have breeding be part of the animal sheltering system, and I would have all of them follow the adoption practices of the best-run rescue groups and sanctuaries; their mission is to place animals in loving families and to make sure that the animals are treated with kindness and respect, whereas the mission of puppy mills and pet stores that use them is money - which inevitably is at odds with the animals' interests. For now, the best way to help companion animals is to a) adopt from the shelter, b) spay or neuter all your pets, c) encourage friends and family to do the same.
I appreciate your concern for these animals, and your opposition to puppy mills.
A reasonable model for breeding that is less ethically objectionable is the small cat breeder who raises the cats in comfortable home settings, gives them proper care, attention, and socialization, and carefully screens prospective owners/guardians. This costs more; so be it. Misery is cheaper and more profitable but wrong. Slavery and child labor are cheap, too, and at one time we rationalized that they were essential to the economy, but then as now, we were merely exploiting those without power. People who really want an animal, who have the committment to take care of an animal for life, and who have the financial means to support the animal's needs, will gladly pay more for the animal, especially if they know that the higher fees ensure the animals' welfare. Impulse buyers and those who don't have the dedication or money to properly care for an animal will balk at higher upfront costs - and that is a good thing; there are far too many animals in homes that should not have animals. As a rescue league volunteer, I have seen how the animals in these homes suffer; sometimes it is heartbreaking. Keep in mind that by far the greatest monetary outlay in caring for an animal is not the upfront fee but the day-to-day expenses and the veterinary treatment that tends to become more costly as the animal ages.
There are many other issues involved in breeding that are outside the scope of this thread. For instance, the preoccupation with looks has been to the detriment of the animals' health. If it were up to me, in the future, I would have breeding be part of the animal sheltering system, and I would have all of them follow the adoption practices of the best-run rescue groups and sanctuaries; their mission is to place animals in loving families and to make sure that the animals are treated with kindness and respect, whereas the mission of puppy mills and pet stores that use them is money - which inevitably is at odds with the animals' interests. For now, the best way to help companion animals is to a) adopt from the shelter, b) spay or neuter all your pets, c) encourage friends and family to do the same.
I appreciate your concern for these animals, and your opposition to puppy mills.
Thank you for making it clear to me how it could work outside of using pet stores and for everything else.
I have a Petland Chain store in the Largo Mall here in Largo, Florida. Their prices for such adorable puppies are outrageous - in the hundreds and thousands of dollars. So high are the prices, that they even have their own financial payment plan. At the cost of their animals, I am outraged to learn that they are in the "puppy mill" business. I am also a volunteer for a local animal shelter and a freelance writer and I am going to set the record straight. Perhaps I can find many people willing to boycott PETLAND here. Thank you for all the inspiration. I will see to it that the newspapers are informed of PETLAND's activities.
THANS, Susan B.
Post a Comment
THANS, Susan B.




